Merged threads on ASCO code confusion

Old May 17th 2010, 12:21 pm
  #16  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
oliman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 305
oliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to all
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by umair View Post
Hi oliman,
Can you please tell me about the ASCO Code mentioned in your ACS Approval letter.
it is 2231-79 (C# specialist)
Also what is your specialization?
it is 2231-79 (C# specialist)
I have ACS Approval based on ASCO Code : 2231-79(.Net specialist) just like shafaqat has.

Which anzsco code matches to 2231-79(.NET Specialist) ?

261111 ICT Business Analyst (I think so but not sure)

Please advice.
Thanks..
^
oliman is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 1:08 pm
  #17  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 172
f4fred is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
Mr f4fred, fo not post your own speculations and guesses unless you have concrete and authentic support to your comments! You are causing confusion amongst many of us.
Dear Oliman,

I made no speculation rather all I saw at DIAC. I try to convince you.

As new SOL applies to new applicants hence any one with a +ve or under process assessment for an old SOL occupation cant lodge an application with DIAC.

This way, anyone who has a +ve or under process assessment for an old SOL occupation has to find suitable occupation in new SOL and get re-assessed to apply with DIAC against some new SOL occupation.

So what is confusing and what is speculation?

Its hard to digest this fact but this is a fact any way. I am not saying those with an old SOL occupation have missed the boat, rather I am saying, to leave the old SOL discussion and prepare for the new one.

Please point out if you still think I was speculating or confusing.

Regards,

Fred, F.
f4fred is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 1:45 pm
  #18  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
oliman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 305
oliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to all
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by f4fred View Post
Dear Oliman,

I made no speculation rather all I saw at DIAC. I try to convince you.

As new SOL applies to new applicants hence any one with a +ve or under process assessment for an old SOL occupation cant lodge an application with DIAC.

This way, anyone who has a +ve or under process assessment for an old SOL occupation has to find suitable occupation in new SOL and get re-assessed to apply with DIAC against some new SOL occupation.

So what is confusing and what is speculation?

Its hard to digest this fact but this is a fact any way. I am not saying those with an old SOL occupation have missed the boat, rather I am saying, to leave the old SOL discussion and prepare for the new one.

Please point out if you still think I was speculating or confusing.

Regards,

Fred, F.
Dear f4fred,

Thank you for explaining yourself. As far as I can see, you are using your own justification on considering skill assessment to be invalid which were done for old SOL occupations. You still don't have any official statement to support your comments.

What will actually happen in this situation will be further clarified by either DIAC or some registered agent.

Regards
oliman is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:03 pm
  #19  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
I did some research on this issue, and come to know that following ANZCO code matches to my ASCO (which i recieved in my skill assessment result)

261111 ICT Business Analyst 2231-79 p Computing Professionals nec

261111 ANZCO also happens to be present in the newly announed SOL.

So does it means that me and others having 2231-79 ASCO in their skill assessment are in new SOL?

Also, what about skill assessment, would that be needed to be done again for new ANZCO?


Many thanks for reading and replying.
@Oliman,

This is very important, where did you see 261111 being equal to 2231-79 nec ?

Looks like 2232-79 are screwed !

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:19 pm
  #20  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
oliman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 305
oliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to all
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by foha2012 View Post
@Oliman,

This is very important, where did you see 261111 being equal to 2231-79 nec ?

Looks like 2232-79 are screwed !

Cheers,

TAA
I compared 261111 being equal to 2231-79 from following Excel file which is attached with this post.

And I found that file from following URL.

http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/[email protected]?opendocument
oliman is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:25 pm
  #21  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
I compared 261111 being equal to 2231-79 from following Excel file which is attached with this post.

And I found that file from following URL.

http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/[email protected]?opendocument
@Oliman,

FYI, I was the one who found out that link and posted it here on BE.

BUT the fact remains, it has 2231 mapped to 261111 but no 2231-79.

I think George Lombard's is right, there is more clarification on its way from DIAC reagarding ICT.

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:29 pm
  #22  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by foha2012 View Post
@Oliman,

FYI, I was the one who found out that link and posted it here on BE.

BUT the fact remains, it has 2231 mapped to 261111 but no 2231-79.

I think George Lombard's is right, there is more clarification on its way from DIAC reagarding ICT.

Cheers,

TAA
These are stressful times.. I could hardly sleep last night.. Just the thought of letting it all slip after so much hard work is just plain unacceptable...

But one must not loose hope.. Knowing that there are so many like me out here is really comforting.

Thanks BE,

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:31 pm
  #23  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
oliman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 305
oliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to all
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by foha2012 View Post
@Oliman,

FYI, I was the one who found out that link and posted it here on BE.

BUT the fact remains, it has 2231 mapped to 261111 but no 2231-79.

I think George Lombard's is right, there is more clarification on its way from DIAC reagarding ICT.

Cheers,

TAA
Foha2012,

pay more attention and look again at the excel file under the sheet name "Table 1". At row 441, it has following entry.

261111 ICT Business Analyst 2231-79 p Computing Professionals nec


this entry exists under sheet name "Table 2" as well in the excel file.
oliman is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 2:51 pm
  #24  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
adhetz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
Foha2012,

pay more attention and look again at the excel file under the sheet name "Table 1". At row 441, it has following entry.

261111 ICT Business Analyst 2231-79 p Computing Professionals nec


this entry exists under sheet name "Table 2" as well in the excel file.
How about network security where does it belongs??
adhetz is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 3:20 pm
  #25  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
Foha2012,

pay more attention and look again at the excel file under the sheet name "Table 1". At row 441, it has following entry.

261111 ICT Business Analyst 2231-79 p Computing Professionals nec


this entry exists under sheet name "Table 2" as well in the excel file.
@Oliman,

You are the man !. It is there, I can see it.. Its a partial match (p).

So what does that mean? I dont have to go to ACS again ?. would my current ACS assessment valid for this new code aswell ?.

I would appreciate if anyone can give me a factual answer.

There might be hope after all....

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 3:35 pm
  #26  
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
oliman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 305
oliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to alloliman is a name known to all
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by foha2012 View Post
@Oliman,

You are the man !. It is there, I can see it.. Its a partial match (p).

So what does that mean? I dont have to go to ACS again ?. would my current ACS assessment valid for this new code aswell ?.

I would appreciate if anyone can give me a factual answer.

There might be hope after all....

Cheers,

TAA
You seem to be panic Foha2012, just calm down and think positive.

About re-assessment question, I have send an email to ACS authorities for the clarification of skill assessment letter validity. I think they themselves rely on further clarification for DIAC. Till then, lets wait for some authentic news from DIAC or a registered agent.
oliman is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 3:43 pm
  #27  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by oliman View Post
You seem to be panic Foha2012, just calm down and think positive.

About re-assessment question, I have send an email to ACS authorities for the clarification of skill assessment letter validity. I think they themselves rely on further clarification for DIAC. Till then, lets wait for some authentic news from DIAC or a registered agent.
@Oliman,

Thanks dude,

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 4:24 pm
  #28  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 247
sufyan_victoria will become famous soon enoughsufyan_victoria will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by foha2012 View Post
@Oliman,

Thanks dude,

Cheers,

TAA
Guys keep fingure crossed.

As its new SOL bumped out without MODL and CSL , why dont you guys debate about new MODL and CSL , did you guys ever find specialized category in old SOL no never but in MODL and CSL.

What about new MODL and CSL why it is not been published yet?
sufyan_victoria is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 4:36 pm
  #29  
Waiting .....
 
foha2012's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
foha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the roughfoha2012 is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

Originally Posted by sufyan_victoria View Post
Guys keep fingure crossed.

As its new SOL bumped out without MODL and CSL , why dont you guys debate about new MODL and CSL , did you guys ever find specialized category in old SOL no never but in MODL and CSL.

What about new MODL and CSL why it is not been published yet?
@Sufiyan,

Dude, its still early days, let the seniors comprehend the situation, they will advice us accordingly. Just wait a little.

Cheers,

TAA
foha2012 is offline  
Old May 17th 2010, 4:46 pm
  #30  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 131
capetosydney will become famous soon enoughcapetosydney will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Where does ASCO 2231-79 matches to newly annocuned SOL???

ASCO 2231-79 included per ASCO definition:

2231-79 Computing Professionals nec

This occupation group covers Computing Professionals not elsewhere classified.

Occupations in this group include:
Computer Analyst
Computer Scientist
Computing Tester
Database Analyst
Local Area Network (LAN) Controller

New ANZSCO codes are:

261111 ICT business analyst
261112 Systems analyst
261311 Analyst programmer
261312 Developer programmer
261313 Software engineer
263311 Telecommunications engineer

so therefore:

Computer Scientist most likely maps to 261313 Software Engineer
Computing Tester perhaps 261112
Computer Analyst and Database Analyst most likely to 261313
Local Area Network (LAN) Controller ?? perhaps 263311

So everyone relax, it is more in semantics than substance, most, if not all sub-occupations are still there.
capetosydney is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.