Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
May 26th 2010, 8:25 pm
#151
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 247
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
Dear all,
DIAC doesn't visit this forum to see how frustrated all IT people are with that ambiguity in the ANZSCO codes.
Has anyone mailed DIAC for a clarification or atleast a date on which they are gonna clarify the translation between the former and current codes?
Cheers,
TAA
DIAC doesn't visit this forum to see how frustrated all IT people are with that ambiguity in the ANZSCO codes.
Has anyone mailed DIAC for a clarification or atleast a date on which they are gonna clarify the translation between the former and current codes?
Cheers,
TAA
May 26th 2010, 11:25 pm
#152
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 499
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
Guys..
U are right.
Please try to contact DIAC about this matter as well.
Thanks..
U are right.
Please try to contact DIAC about this matter as well.
Thanks..
May 27th 2010, 12:25 am
#153
Home and Happy
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,811
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
Three threads merged to keep the info together 
May 27th 2010, 3:55 am
#154
Still alive
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,994
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
Ex-Exile,
Well, I could have quoted that Butthole comment in my post but I didn't. And as for people abusing the system to get in. Well it has happened before and it will happen again. Changing the SOL won't stop that. And for incompetent IT people getting through ACS you can't help it either.
Question is, what can you do?. I merely asked to keep your depressed negative opinion to yourself. Nothing more, and you have gotten down to buttholes and stinks.. Guess DIAC is not doing a great job after all letting people like you inside.
But then again, its just my opinion, and opinions are like buttholes, everybody has got them..
Cheers,
TAA
Well, I could have quoted that Butthole comment in my post but I didn't. And as for people abusing the system to get in. Well it has happened before and it will happen again. Changing the SOL won't stop that. And for incompetent IT people getting through ACS you can't help it either.
Question is, what can you do?. I merely asked to keep your depressed negative opinion to yourself. Nothing more, and you have gotten down to buttholes and stinks.. Guess DIAC is not doing a great job after all letting people like you inside.
But then again, its just my opinion, and opinions are like buttholes, everybody has got them..
Cheers,
TAA
Dear all,
DIAC doesn't visit this forum to see how frustrated all IT people are with that ambiguity in the ANZSCO codes.
Has anyone mailed DIAC for a clarification or atleast a date on which they are gonna clarify the translation between the former and current codes?
Cheers,
TAA
DIAC doesn't visit this forum to see how frustrated all IT people are with that ambiguity in the ANZSCO codes.
Has anyone mailed DIAC for a clarification or atleast a date on which they are gonna clarify the translation between the former and current codes?
Cheers,
TAA
May 27th 2010, 9:52 am
#156
Just Joined
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 11
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
Hello all,
I received state sponsorship from Queensland in 7th May 2010 and I got ACS skill assessment (2231-79) in 15th Jul 2009. My concern is skill assessment.
If I assume that I can register my 176 visa without review of ACS because of state sponsorship in the first week of July 2010, do I still need to extend the skill assessement?
I received state sponsorship from Queensland in 7th May 2010 and I got ACS skill assessment (2231-79) in 15th Jul 2009. My concern is skill assessment.
If I assume that I can register my 176 visa without review of ACS because of state sponsorship in the first week of July 2010, do I still need to extend the skill assessement?
May 27th 2010, 10:12 am
#157
Just Joined
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 29
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
Hello all,
I received state sponsorship from Queensland in 7th May 2010 and I got ACS skill assessment (2231-79) in 15th Jul 2009. My concern is skill assessment.
If I assume that I can register my 176 visa without review of ACS because of state sponsorship in the first week of July 2010, do I still need to extend the skill assessement?
I received state sponsorship from Queensland in 7th May 2010 and I got ACS skill assessment (2231-79) in 15th Jul 2009. My concern is skill assessment.
If I assume that I can register my 176 visa without review of ACS because of state sponsorship in the first week of July 2010, do I still need to extend the skill assessement?
May 27th 2010, 10:46 am
#158
Shiny Arse Know All
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Adelaide, somewhere
Posts: 14,180
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
May 27th 2010, 11:09 am
#159
BE Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 307
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
I am also in the same situation as I received my SA SS on 6th may but could not apply for immigration before 7th may suspension.
Please clarify.
May 27th 2010, 11:31 am
#160
Just Joined
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 29
Re: ACS, has anyone emailed DIAC for clarification?
Yes khanzahid I also request for the authenticity of this message that you have posted. Do you have any official statement or link to support your comment to be valid?
I am also in the same situation as I received my SA SS on 6th may but could not apply for immigration before 7th may suspension.
Please clarify.
I am also in the same situation as I received my SA SS on 6th may but could not apply for immigration before 7th may suspension.
Please clarify.
I mentioned the date of ACS assessment expiry in his case,which is 15-July-2010.
Sorry for confusion,I am also in same boat.I have SS valid till 28th Sep but wasn't able to apply DIAC.I have no idea about the future.
May 27th 2010, 2:34 pm
#162
Waiting .....
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 472
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
You would do well to learn some respect for members who have been around a while and actually know what they're talking about. Ex_Exile has been through the process, has worked with ACS and knows what's what. You have been rude to a number of people on various topics and quite honestly it's attitudes like yours that make this forum so much less enjoyable than it used to be.
And FYI, DIAC do read this forum. Some employees used to post a few years ago even.
And FYI, DIAC do read this forum. Some employees used to post a few years ago even.
Dorothy,
When exactly I was rude to a number of people ? Please clarify... I think you have mistaken me with someone else.
Thanks
TAA
Jun 1st 2010, 3:48 pm
#163
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 50
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
Hi All
Playing the Broken record once again
Any updates on 2231-79 confusion?
Cheers!
Virdi
Playing the Broken record once again
Any updates on 2231-79 confusion?
Cheers!
Virdi
Jun 1st 2010, 4:26 pm
#164
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 31
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
Hi,
I had a look at the sticky tread on the DIAC Exposition in Sydney on 31st May and the following is mentioned :
Changes to the ENSOL and 457 occupation lists will be direct translations to ANZSCO at this stage with no substantive changes. The Department will issue a "convergence" or "concordance" list confirming ASCO equivalencies.
Pre-July skills assessments will remain valid depending on the convergence/concordance list and relevant eligibility list, eg new SOL or ENSOL.
Unfortunately, this still doesn't clarify the situation of IT people and it somehow contradicts the last statement made by ACS.
I received my ACS letter on the 29th may and I got the code 2231-79 (Data Warehousing Specialist) as I was expecting. But I really don't know how this is going to be mapped onto the new SOL.
I had a look at the sticky tread on the DIAC Exposition in Sydney on 31st May and the following is mentioned :
Changes to the ENSOL and 457 occupation lists will be direct translations to ANZSCO at this stage with no substantive changes. The Department will issue a "convergence" or "concordance" list confirming ASCO equivalencies.
Pre-July skills assessments will remain valid depending on the convergence/concordance list and relevant eligibility list, eg new SOL or ENSOL.
Unfortunately, this still doesn't clarify the situation of IT people and it somehow contradicts the last statement made by ACS.
I received my ACS letter on the 29th may and I got the code 2231-79 (Data Warehousing Specialist) as I was expecting. But I really don't know how this is going to be mapped onto the new SOL.
Jun 1st 2010, 5:47 pm
#165
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 76
Re: Merged threads on ASCO code confusion
Sounds like your are in the same position as me. Received ACS letter 2231-79 NEC (Oracle Specialist).....I think it's a case of just waiting for more news and hopefully it willall be clarified soon...good luck