Thinking of immigrating to Canada...would love some insight
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Trikky" wrote in message
news:BB0BF271.11045%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > Buddy, you do NOT set the rules while talking to me. Got it?
> Oh, okay oh great one. Forgive me, your humble servant. Please don't
> whup me massa...I be good boy for you now massa!
Glad you got it!
> > I was already too good to answer your questions,
> We're not worthy...
> > if you want my answer to your last question you gotta do what I just
said.
> So, let me get this straight...I don't set the rules while talking to
> you, but YOU set the rules while talking to me? A tad hypocritical, don't
> you think? It's a discussion forum...an internet newsgroup. Last I
looked,
> this was not a moderated group and therefore NOONE was in charge.
Yee-haw!
> > So, I repeat it for you, but for the LAST time:
> >
> > I have never heard of a case of this nature (you did not mention their
> > country of birth or region), could you provide some viable information?
> Who said there IS, or WAS a 'case of this nature'? Then again, I'm
very
> curious as to why 'viable information', a country of birth or region would
> be relevant to your answer. The only reason I can see for that is that if
> the information meets your criteria, then you would answer 'yes',
depending
> on the situation.
OF COURSE, depending on the situation.
> Therefore, I think it's safe to assume that you DO think it
appropriate
> to imprison or DEPORT people who have lived in a country all...or
most...of
> their lives (and, in some cases, are citizens either naturalised or born)
> because of their skin colour, heritage or the shapes of their eyes even
> though they are hard working, honest, valuable members of their community.
> Thank you for your answer through your non-responsiveness. You had an
> opportunity to give an unqualified 'no' to that question and since you
were
> so hesitant to say 'no' (it WAS a straightforward and clearly worded
> question, after all), then your only remaining answers are 'yes' or
'maybe'
> (and, of course, if it's 'maybe', then that too means 'yes'.
Why should I say NO when I do NOT know the facts you are referring to. If
somebody is linked to terrorism (from MiddleEast or anywhere in the world),
or a criminal (as many Jamaicans in Toronto), or an illegal immigrant (who
has no proven grounds for political asylum), etc, they should be deported
right away. All scumbags should be kept out of this country and this
continent. Clear now?
news:BB0BF271.11045%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > Buddy, you do NOT set the rules while talking to me. Got it?
> Oh, okay oh great one. Forgive me, your humble servant. Please don't
> whup me massa...I be good boy for you now massa!
Glad you got it!
> > I was already too good to answer your questions,
> We're not worthy...
> > if you want my answer to your last question you gotta do what I just
said.
> So, let me get this straight...I don't set the rules while talking to
> you, but YOU set the rules while talking to me? A tad hypocritical, don't
> you think? It's a discussion forum...an internet newsgroup. Last I
looked,
> this was not a moderated group and therefore NOONE was in charge.
Yee-haw!
> > So, I repeat it for you, but for the LAST time:
> >
> > I have never heard of a case of this nature (you did not mention their
> > country of birth or region), could you provide some viable information?
> Who said there IS, or WAS a 'case of this nature'? Then again, I'm
very
> curious as to why 'viable information', a country of birth or region would
> be relevant to your answer. The only reason I can see for that is that if
> the information meets your criteria, then you would answer 'yes',
depending
> on the situation.
OF COURSE, depending on the situation.
> Therefore, I think it's safe to assume that you DO think it
appropriate
> to imprison or DEPORT people who have lived in a country all...or
most...of
> their lives (and, in some cases, are citizens either naturalised or born)
> because of their skin colour, heritage or the shapes of their eyes even
> though they are hard working, honest, valuable members of their community.
> Thank you for your answer through your non-responsiveness. You had an
> opportunity to give an unqualified 'no' to that question and since you
were
> so hesitant to say 'no' (it WAS a straightforward and clearly worded
> question, after all), then your only remaining answers are 'yes' or
'maybe'
> (and, of course, if it's 'maybe', then that too means 'yes'.
Why should I say NO when I do NOT know the facts you are referring to. If
somebody is linked to terrorism (from MiddleEast or anywhere in the world),
or a criminal (as many Jamaicans in Toronto), or an illegal immigrant (who
has no proven grounds for political asylum), etc, they should be deported
right away. All scumbags should be kept out of this country and this
continent. Clear now?
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Trikky" wrote in message
news:BB0BF314.11048%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > Who the **** are you to DEMAND and answer from me? Go **** yourself,
maybe
> > that way you will get a proper answer. Period.
> Tsk, tsk...resorting to vulgar language now to get your point across
> now, are we? Next you'll be calling him a left-wing activist.
He is already one, he admitted it himself (social-democrats are on the left
side of the political spectrum)
> I think it's amusing that you get all upitty about someone 'demanding'
> an answer from you...yet you DEMANDED an answer from me (your request for
> 'viable information'), as you put it...'one LAST time'.
Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
person my answer.
news:BB0BF314.11048%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > Who the **** are you to DEMAND and answer from me? Go **** yourself,
maybe
> > that way you will get a proper answer. Period.
> Tsk, tsk...resorting to vulgar language now to get your point across
> now, are we? Next you'll be calling him a left-wing activist.
He is already one, he admitted it himself (social-democrats are on the left
side of the political spectrum)
> I think it's amusing that you get all upitty about someone 'demanding'
> an answer from you...yet you DEMANDED an answer from me (your request for
> 'viable information'), as you put it...'one LAST time'.
Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
person my answer.
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Chris wrote:
>
> "Trikky" wrote in message
> news:BB0BF314.11048%[email protected]...
> > in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> >
> > > Who the **** are you to DEMAND and answer from me? Go **** yourself,
> maybe
> > > that way you will get a proper answer. Period.
> >
> > Tsk, tsk...resorting to vulgar language now to get your point across
> > now, are we? Next you'll be calling him a left-wing activist.
>
> He is already one, he admitted it himself (social-democrats are on the left
> side of the political spectrum)
Who said I'm a social democrat ? And who says that social democrats
must be left leaning politically, or how left they are? Learn something
about politics before you start spouting more gibberish.
> > I think it's amusing that you get all upitty about someone 'demanding'
> > an answer from you...yet you DEMANDED an answer from me (your request for
> > 'viable information'), as you put it...'one LAST time'.
>
> Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
> person my answer.
Threats now???? Continue and you'll lose your internet access.
>
> "Trikky" wrote in message
> news:BB0BF314.11048%[email protected]...
> > in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> >
> > > Who the **** are you to DEMAND and answer from me? Go **** yourself,
> maybe
> > > that way you will get a proper answer. Period.
> >
> > Tsk, tsk...resorting to vulgar language now to get your point across
> > now, are we? Next you'll be calling him a left-wing activist.
>
> He is already one, he admitted it himself (social-democrats are on the left
> side of the political spectrum)
Who said I'm a social democrat ? And who says that social democrats
must be left leaning politically, or how left they are? Learn something
about politics before you start spouting more gibberish.
> > I think it's amusing that you get all upitty about someone 'demanding'
> > an answer from you...yet you DEMANDED an answer from me (your request for
> > 'viable information'), as you put it...'one LAST time'.
>
> Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
> person my answer.
Threats now???? Continue and you'll lose your internet access.
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
> person my answer.
Oooooooooh....a threat now. I'm scared. Ya know, Chris, this only
shows that I am a MUCH better person than you. Ya know why? Because I
don't take this USEnet thing personally. I don't take it seriously. You on
the other hand...swearing, insults and now threats...taking it seriously in
an obviously unhealthy manner.
I'd suggest you join Aikido on his next trip to Australia where you can
relax and recover. Oh, wait...that's no good. He's Asian and you never
know, he might have SARS.
> Hopefully you don't have to meet me in real life... to make me DELIVER in
> person my answer.
Oooooooooh....a threat now. I'm scared. Ya know, Chris, this only
shows that I am a MUCH better person than you. Ya know why? Because I
don't take this USEnet thing personally. I don't take it seriously. You on
the other hand...swearing, insults and now threats...taking it seriously in
an obviously unhealthy manner.
I'd suggest you join Aikido on his next trip to Australia where you can
relax and recover. Oh, wait...that's no good. He's Asian and you never
know, he might have SARS.
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> Why should I say NO when I do NOT know the facts you are referring to.
If you do not know the 'facts' by now, then you never will. The facts
are right there in the passage you have had in front of you several times.
People deported or imprisoned by a country they have lived in all or most of
their lives...hard working, honest and valuable members of their
community...solely because of their skin colour, heritage or the shapes of
their eyes. My question did not have any fine print...any asterixes
indicating further information coming...it couldn't have been any more
straightforward. And the question was simpler. Do you think it's
acceptable to do this (deport or imprison people)...yes or no? Couldn't
have been more obvious, more simple...but you turned it into something else.
At least now your answer IS obvious...you DO believe it is appropriate,
as I had expected all along. If you didn't, you would have answered 'no'
like all reasonable people.
Thank you.
> Why should I say NO when I do NOT know the facts you are referring to.
If you do not know the 'facts' by now, then you never will. The facts
are right there in the passage you have had in front of you several times.
People deported or imprisoned by a country they have lived in all or most of
their lives...hard working, honest and valuable members of their
community...solely because of their skin colour, heritage or the shapes of
their eyes. My question did not have any fine print...any asterixes
indicating further information coming...it couldn't have been any more
straightforward. And the question was simpler. Do you think it's
acceptable to do this (deport or imprison people)...yes or no? Couldn't
have been more obvious, more simple...but you turned it into something else.
At least now your answer IS obvious...you DO believe it is appropriate,
as I had expected all along. If you didn't, you would have answered 'no'
like all reasonable people.
Thank you.
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the factors
> outlined by you!
Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because, as
you put it, blacks commit more crimes. You stated that you support the
imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
ethnicity...should I quote you>
Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
> I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the factors
> outlined by you!
Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because, as
you put it, blacks commit more crimes. You stated that you support the
imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
ethnicity...should I quote you>
Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh Trikky is a black woman...nothing wrong with that.
>Subject: Re: Thinking of immigrating to Canada...would love some insight
>From: Trikky [email protected]
>Date: 6/15/03 2:57 AM Atlantic Daylight Time
>Message-id:
>in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
>> I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the factors
>> outlined by you!
> Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because, as
>you put it, blacks commit more crimes. You stated that you support the
>imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
>heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
>support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
>ethnicity...should I quote you>
> Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
>Subject: Re: Thinking of immigrating to Canada...would love some insight
>From: Trikky [email protected]
>Date: 6/15/03 2:57 AM Atlantic Daylight Time
>Message-id:
>in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
>> I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the factors
>> outlined by you!
> Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because, as
>you put it, blacks commit more crimes. You stated that you support the
>imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
>heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
>support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
>ethnicity...should I quote you>
> Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Trikky" wrote in message
news:BB11581F.1183D%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the
factors
> > outlined by you!
> Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because,
as
> you put it, blacks commit more crimes.
Yes, and the Toronto Police Department is forced to work under the same
(unofficial) rule. As I said before, MOST of the homicides and other violent
crimes, also car and other property thefts, are done by blacks, but the vast
majority of them are from Jamaica only. Even our PD Chief, Julian Fantino,
took an official trip to Kingston, that was a couple of months ago, he
wanted to see for himself the way life goes on in Jamaica, to see if he can
do something to stop all the gang fighting that happens in Toronto.
Unfortunately, because of some Jamaican criminals that make about 80% of all
the crimes in Toronto, ALL blacks have to suffer, and that's until either
all Jamaicans are removed from Toronto or the Toronto PD finds a reasonable
solution to fix this problem once it for all.
You stated that you support the
> imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
> heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
> support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
> ethnicity...should I quote you>
Yes, 99% of the people in MidEast HATE US and they would do anything in
their power to help somebody commit terrorist acts against US citizens or US
institutions.
> Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
Man, I think you are IN LOVE with me. Just couple a days ago you just said
that you are NOT going to reply to any of my messages (do you think that I
REALLY care about you????????), that you are going to kill my e-mail/domain
address, but as I can see you cannot stop yourself jerking-off on my "sexy"
messages.
Baby, think of me first time you do your nightly "practice".
Chris
news:BB11581F.1183D%[email protected]...
> in a recent article, Chris ([email protected]) said:
> > I have never stated that I support any discrimination based on the
factors
> > outlined by you!
> Funny...you said you DID support the pulling over of blacks because,
as
> you put it, blacks commit more crimes.
Yes, and the Toronto Police Department is forced to work under the same
(unofficial) rule. As I said before, MOST of the homicides and other violent
crimes, also car and other property thefts, are done by blacks, but the vast
majority of them are from Jamaica only. Even our PD Chief, Julian Fantino,
took an official trip to Kingston, that was a couple of months ago, he
wanted to see for himself the way life goes on in Jamaica, to see if he can
do something to stop all the gang fighting that happens in Toronto.
Unfortunately, because of some Jamaican criminals that make about 80% of all
the crimes in Toronto, ALL blacks have to suffer, and that's until either
all Jamaicans are removed from Toronto or the Toronto PD finds a reasonable
solution to fix this problem once it for all.
You stated that you support the
> imprisonment or deportation of people just because of their ethnicity or
> heritage (in circumstances acceptable to you, of course), you said you
> support the discriminatory profiling because of a person's
> ethnicity...should I quote you>
Yes, 99% of the people in MidEast HATE US and they would do anything in
their power to help somebody commit terrorist acts against US citizens or US
institutions.
> Onto my kill file you go. Goodnight.
Man, I think you are IN LOVE with me. Just couple a days ago you just said
that you are NOT going to reply to any of my messages (do you think that I
REALLY care about you????????), that you are going to kill my e-mail/domain
address, but as I can see you cannot stop yourself jerking-off on my "sexy"
messages.
Baby, think of me first time you do your nightly "practice".
Chris