Wikiposts

Section 38(1)(c)

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 11th 2009, 12:20 am
  #1  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Section 38(1)(c)

During February 2009, the Canadian High Commission has told an applicant that they might refuse the entry to Canada based on section 38(1)(c) ..and asked for more details and reports. The applicant was in Canada for 3 + years.

After the submission of the reports, during April 2009,they asked the applicant to wait until they contact and also any other additional information would be assessed by the visa officer.

What would be their decision ?
electrons is offline  
Old Aug 11th 2009, 12:22 am
  #2  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
christmasoompa's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: In a darkened room somewhere.............
Posts: 34,169
christmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Originally Posted by electrons
What would be their decision ?
Hang on, let me just grab my crystal ball.......................
christmasoompa is offline  
Old Aug 11th 2009, 12:41 am
  #3  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

No chances ???

I am the spouse of the applicant. Is CHC expecting me to leave Canada and reject the case ???
electrons is offline  
Old Aug 11th 2009, 5:21 am
  #4  
BE Enthusiast
 
kleinluka's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 840
kleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

You are not giving us enough information to tell you what could happen.

CIC often ask for additional docs if they have doubts about the application. This is their way of giving you the chance to correct any doubts they may have. If you can't convince the officer that you are eligible/admissible then you will get a refusal. Since you didn't provide any further information it is really hard to say anything else.
kleinluka is offline  
Old Aug 11th 2009, 7:01 am
  #5  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Aviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Looking at previous posts by the OP, it seems there maybe more to the situation than being posted. Without knowing what's going on it is hard for anyone to give a reasonable response.
Aviator is offline  
Old Aug 15th 2009, 1:27 pm
  #6  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Originally Posted by electrons
No chances ???

I am the spouse of the applicant. Is CHC expecting me to leave Canada and reject the case ???
Have you consulted with a lawyer?

http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/sta...2001-c-27.html

It appears that section 38(1) relates to health issues.
JAJ is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 6:12 am
  #7  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,483
Jim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

If your OH is found to be as described in that section then you will be expected to leave Canada too as would any children not born in Canada, provided you are not a Canadian citizen.
Jim Humphries is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 6:15 am
  #8  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Thanks Jim,

If i get a study permit,then cud i stay in Canada and visit my spouse at home ?

electrons.
electrons is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 7:07 am
  #9  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,483
Jim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

You would have to get a study permit outside of Canada. If you were successful then you could study in Canada and visit your OH overseas.
Jim Humphries is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 7:10 am
  #10  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Thanks Jim,

So , no chances of living in Canada ... !!!

I'll start packing slowly ....


Last edited by electrons; Aug 16th 2009 at 7:15 am.
electrons is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 8:41 am
  #11  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,483
Jim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond reputeJim Humphries has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

The decision is still to be made so there is no rush.
Jim Humphries is offline  
Old Aug 16th 2009, 6:22 pm
  #12  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

Thanks Jim,

I have found out two new employers who were interested in hiring me as a temporary foreign worker and am planning to get a study permit.

My chances of staying in Canada thru' the TWP/Study permit would get affected based on my spouse's condition and the CHC's decision.

I explained my situation to some people and they told me that my status was 'red flagged' in the immigration database and the CHC was waiting for me to leave Canada. Is this true ?

Please, let me know this.

electrons.
electrons is offline  
Old Aug 17th 2009, 3:03 am
  #13  
BE Enthusiast
 
kleinluka's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 840
kleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to beholdkleinluka is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

what "people" did you talk to ?
kleinluka is offline  
Old Aug 17th 2009, 3:04 am
  #14  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
electrons is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Section 38(1)(c)

CSIC immigration consultants
electrons is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.