Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
Jun 10th 2002, 6:25 pm
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
NOT REQUIRED.
Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
this. Sandhu.
Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
NOT REQUIRED.
Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
this. Sandhu.
Jun 10th 2002, 7:21 pm
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
>
> Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT
> REQUIRED.
>
> Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> this. Sandhu.
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
>
> Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT
> REQUIRED.
>
> Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> this. Sandhu.
Jun 11th 2002, 12:20 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
"Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> >
> > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> > RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> > YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
> > NOT REQUIRED.
> >
> > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > this. Sandhu.
Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
implemented. Sandhu.
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> >
> > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> > RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> > YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
> > NOT REQUIRED.
> >
> > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > this. Sandhu.
Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
implemented. Sandhu.
Jun 11th 2002, 1:20 am
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
"Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> >
> > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> > RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> > YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
> > NOT REQUIRED.
> >
> > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > this. Sandhu.
Sandhu:
Because a 3 year old child cannot form the intention to abandon Canada as a place of
residence they normally do not require a RRP however the airline on which they travel
back to Canada may have a problem with this particularly as the parents have RRPs. If
they applied for the child and made a payment i would request a RRP neverthelesss or
a written explanation if one was not given.
Jim Metcalfe, Consultant and former visa officer
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> >
> > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> > RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3
> > YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE IT IS
> > NOT REQUIRED.
> >
> > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > this. Sandhu.
Sandhu:
Because a 3 year old child cannot form the intention to abandon Canada as a place of
residence they normally do not require a RRP however the airline on which they travel
back to Canada may have a problem with this particularly as the parents have RRPs. If
they applied for the child and made a payment i would request a RRP neverthelesss or
a written explanation if one was not given.
Jim Metcalfe, Consultant and former visa officer
Jun 11th 2002, 2:20 am
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada upon landing at
all as they just visited here only for one week back in October. So, depending from
what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the maintenance of PR status
will be established in final version of Regulations they may be in troubles if not
moving permanently to Canada before the expiration of their RRP. They are lucky that
RRP was granted under such circumstances in the first place...
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> implemented. Sandhu.
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> > >
> > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED
> > > FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP
> > > FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE
> > > IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > >
> > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > > this. Sandhu.
all as they just visited here only for one week back in October. So, depending from
what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the maintenance of PR status
will be established in final version of Regulations they may be in troubles if not
moving permanently to Canada before the expiration of their RRP. They are lucky that
RRP was granted under such circumstances in the first place...
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> implemented. Sandhu.
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her husband.
> > >
> > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED
> > > FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 RRP
> > > FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS OF AGE
> > > IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > >
> > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > > this. Sandhu.
Jun 13th 2002, 2:21 am
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
"Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada upon landing
> at all as they just visited here only for one week back in October. So, depending
> from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the maintenance of PR
> status will be established in final version of Regulations they may be in troubles
> if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration of their RRP. They are
> lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the first place...
>
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > implemented. Sandhu.
>
>
> > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ../..
> > >
> > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > sending email)
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > husband.
> > > >
> > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED
> > > > FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002
> > > > RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS
> > > > OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > >
> > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > > > this. Sandhu.
> >
> >
Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
that. Sandhu
news:<[email protected] >...
> It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada upon landing
> at all as they just visited here only for one week back in October. So, depending
> from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the maintenance of PR
> status will be established in final version of Regulations they may be in troubles
> if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration of their RRP. They are
> lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the first place...
>
>
> --
>
> ../..
>
> Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> sending email)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > implemented. Sandhu.
>
>
> > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ../..
> > >
> > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > sending email)
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > husband.
> > > >
> > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED
> > > > FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002
> > > > RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT TILL 14 YEARS
> > > > OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > >
> > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light on
> > > > this. Sandhu.
> >
> >
Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
that. Sandhu
Jun 13th 2002, 3:27 am
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
The period of their absence until July 31, 2002 is covered by RRP and after that 2/5
rule applies. But I'm not sure how their absence will be treated if they won't return
before the expiration of RRP - it is a **Returning** Resident Permit after all.
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada upon landing
> > at all as they just visited here only for one week back in October.
So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
> > > > > TILL
14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light
> > > > > on this. Sandhu.
> > >
>
rule applies. But I'm not sure how their absence will be treated if they won't return
before the expiration of RRP - it is a **Returning** Resident Permit after all.
--
../..
Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
sending email)
________________________________
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada upon landing
> > at all as they just visited here only for one week back in October.
So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
> > > > > TILL
14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw some light
> > > > > on this. Sandhu.
> > >
>
Jun 13th 2002, 9:21 am
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
The Regulations state that
--
All responses IMHO and no one else's.
Berto Volpentesta Member OPIC, Director OPIC
Sidhu & Volpentesta Inc. Serving People Around the World Since 1991 www.svcanada.com
321-3701 Chesswood Dr., Toronto, ON M3J 2P6 Canada
_________________________________________
Berto Volpentesta +1(416) 398 8882 Office +1(416) 787 0612 Office 2 +1(416) 892 2916
Cell e-mail: [email protected] ICQ#: 50212503 SMS ICQ): +278314250212503
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada
upon
> > landing at all as they just visited here only for one week back in
October. So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
TILL 14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw
some
> > > > > light on this. Sandhu.
> > >
> > >
>
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
--
All responses IMHO and no one else's.
Berto Volpentesta Member OPIC, Director OPIC
Sidhu & Volpentesta Inc. Serving People Around the World Since 1991 www.svcanada.com
321-3701 Chesswood Dr., Toronto, ON M3J 2P6 Canada
_________________________________________
Berto Volpentesta +1(416) 398 8882 Office +1(416) 787 0612 Office 2 +1(416) 892 2916
Cell e-mail: [email protected] ICQ#: 50212503 SMS ICQ): +278314250212503
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada
upon
> > landing at all as they just visited here only for one week back in
October. So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
TILL 14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw
some
> > > > > light on this. Sandhu.
> > >
> > >
>
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
Jun 13th 2002, 9:21 am
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
Sorry, a little to fast with the fingers.
The regulations state thatt
(2) Any period spent outside Canada within the five years preceding the coming into
force of this section by a permanent resident holding a returning resident
permit is considered to be a period spent in Canada for the purpose of
satisfying the residency obligation under section 28 of the Immigration and
Refugee Protection Act if that period is included in the five year period
referred to in that section.
This seems to be positive indication that the 2/5 years rule will apply in
consideration of the above.
Would it be safe to assume those who do not have a permit would have been considered
to have not been resident for that time and then applying the 2/5 rule to determine
their residents?
--
All responses IMHO and no one else's.
Berto Volpentesta Member OPIC, Director OPIC
Sidhu & Volpentesta Inc. Serving People Around the World Since 1991 www.svcanada.com
321-3701 Chesswood Dr., Toronto, ON M3J 2P6 Canada
_________________________________________
Berto Volpentesta +1(416) 398 8882 Office +1(416) 787 0612 Office 2 +1(416) 892 2916
Cell e-mail: [email protected] ICQ#: 50212503 SMS ICQ): +278314250212503
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada
upon
> > landing at all as they just visited here only for one week back in
October. So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
TILL 14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw
some
> > > > > light on this. Sandhu.
> > >
> > >
>
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
The regulations state thatt
(2) Any period spent outside Canada within the five years preceding the coming into
force of this section by a permanent resident holding a returning resident
permit is considered to be a period spent in Canada for the purpose of
satisfying the residency obligation under section 28 of the Immigration and
Refugee Protection Act if that period is included in the five year period
referred to in that section.
This seems to be positive indication that the 2/5 years rule will apply in
consideration of the above.
Would it be safe to assume those who do not have a permit would have been considered
to have not been resident for that time and then applying the 2/5 rule to determine
their residents?
--
All responses IMHO and no one else's.
Berto Volpentesta Member OPIC, Director OPIC
Sidhu & Volpentesta Inc. Serving People Around the World Since 1991 www.svcanada.com
321-3701 Chesswood Dr., Toronto, ON M3J 2P6 Canada
_________________________________________
Berto Volpentesta +1(416) 398 8882 Office +1(416) 787 0612 Office 2 +1(416) 892 2916
Cell e-mail: [email protected] ICQ#: 50212503 SMS ICQ): +278314250212503
"sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
news:<[email protected] >...
> > It seems that they haven't established permanent residence in Canada
upon
> > landing at all as they just visited here only for one week back in
October. So,
> > depending from what other than 2/5 years residency requirements for the
> > maintenance of PR status will be established in final version of
Regulations
> > they may be in troubles if not moving permanently to Canada before the expiration
> > of their RRP. They are lucky that RRP was granted under such circumstances in the
> > first place...
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ../..
> >
> > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > sending email)
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Dear mr andrew, sorry I didnt put things clearly.My question is do they have to
> > > travel to canada before expiry of RRP or they will automatically come under
> > > 2/5 years ( to keep PR status intact) after 28 th june when new rules will be
> > > implemented. Sandhu.
> >
> >
> > > "Andrew Miller" <millercitelus.net> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>. ..
> > > > Officer is correct - minor child under 14 doesn't need RRP.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ../..
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Miller Immigration Consultant Vancouver, British Columbia email:
> > > > millercicanada.com (delete REMOVE and INVALID from the above address before
> > > > sending email)
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "sandhu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Dear lawyers, Can any one explain this situation for my sister and her
> > > > > husband.
> > > > >
> > > > > Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001.
> > > > > APPLIED FOR RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31
> > > > > JULY 2002 RRP FOR 3 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER NOT GRANTED.VISA OFFICER SAID THAT
TILL 14
> > > > > YEARS OF AGE IT IS NOT REQUIRED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can any one advise on this aspect .I request Mr Andrew to throw
some
> > > > > light on this. Sandhu.
> > >
> > >
>
>
> Dear Mr Andrew, Now the final version of the new rules have been declared.Can you
> advise what should be done .Travel or not.Pl see my last mail and ur reply to
> that. Sandhu
Jun 17th 2002, 1:20 am
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mr Andrew and et al . Please explain residency criteria for my sisters case
> Dear experts,
>
Now since the new rules are there can any one explain this situation for my sister
and her husband.
>
> Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 Is it
> required to travel or 2 out of 5 rules will be applicable.
sandhu.
>
Now since the new rules are there can any one explain this situation for my sister
and her husband.
>
> Entered Canada as a PR : 8 TH OCT 2001. EXIT CANADA : 14 TH OCT 2001. APPLIED FOR
> RRP ( SELF AND SPOUSE ONLY): 02APRIL 2002 RRP VALID TILL : 31 JULY 2002 Is it
> required to travel or 2 out of 5 rules will be applicable.
sandhu.
