Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > Immigration & Citizenship (Canada)
Reload this Page >

Moving back with children policies?

Wikiposts

Moving back with children policies?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 31st 2014, 11:39 pm
  #1  
Fancy a Cuppa?
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 438
Rosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Moving back with children policies?

Can anyone clear up what the situation is with going to the UK with children.
We have been here exactly 1 year. Children are British born passport holders, but also have Canadian citizenship due to descendancy. Do they still require both parents to sign a letter to fly?
Rosie Lee is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 12:32 am
  #2  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Qc, Canada
Posts: 3,787
Shirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

I don't think nationality/passports have any bearing: when crossing an international border with minor children & only 1 parent, one should always have a letter of consent from the non-travelling parent; OR an official document (court order, etc).

On rereading your question, do you mean the children would be flying unaccompanied by either parent? If so, yes, both parents should furnish a signed letter of consent, or a joint one.


HTH

Last edited by Shirtback; Feb 1st 2014 at 12:36 am. Reason: Not sure I understood the question correctly
Shirtback is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 1:34 am
  #3  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,380
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

It's a North American thing. The pathetic thing is that, normally, nothing is checked when leaving, only when returning. If it was designed to prevent abductions, it is performed too late.

Such a letter is required if both parents are not travelling with the child. So, if only one of you is travelling, or if your child is travelling with others, a letter will be required.

It does not have to be notarised but is it better if it is. This is because anyone could sign the letter, pretending to be the person referred to. A Notary Public will check the ID of the signatory.

Here is a link that explains the Canadian procedure: Consent Travel Letter

Last edited by Almost Canadian; Feb 1st 2014 at 1:36 am.
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 1:57 am
  #4  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Qc, Canada
Posts: 3,787
Shirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
It's a North American thing. The pathetic thing is that, normally, nothing is checked when leaving, only when returning. If it was designed to prevent abductions, it is performed too late.
Not necessarily true, as Daughter & I discovered at the US border a few years ago when crossing without her dad. While they did let us pass, after questioning my then 10 yr old daughter separately from me, I then made sure to have a letter of consent

Such a letter is required if both parents are not travelling with the child. So, if only one of you is travelling, or if your child is travelling with others, a letter will be required.



It does not have to be notarised but is it better if it is. This is because anyone could sign the letter, pretending to be the person referred to. A Notary Public will check the ID of the signatory.

Here is a link that explains the Canadian procedure: Consent Travel Letter
I agree with the rest of your post :-)

My daughter has also had to travel as an UM from Canada to France, where the *airline* required letters of consent, despite her dad being designated as the person meeting her over there.

Ditto Canada - UK trip where letter of consent was verified both on departure from Canada, & on arrival in UK.

Travelling with my sons, whose father has been AWOL for years, I have almost always been required to produce my Sole Custody court documents in order to pass various border controls, & on occasion, the boys were questioned individually.
Shirtback is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 6:31 am
  #5  
Fancy a Cuppa?
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 438
Rosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond reputeRosie Lee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Thanks guys, I get the picture. It's pretty much you need a letter no matter what, even if you are just going shopping over the border!
Rosie Lee is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 6:42 am
  #6  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Qc, Canada
Posts: 3,787
Shirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by Rosie Lee
Thanks guys, I get the picture. It's pretty much you need a letter no matter what, even if you are just going shopping over the border!
Yup, that sums it up nicely :-) Better safe than sorry ;-)!!
Shirtback is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 7:20 am
  #7  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by Rosie Lee
Thanks guys, I get the picture. It's pretty much you need a letter no matter what, even if you are just going shopping over the border!
There is nothing in the law that says you need it. And you won't necessarily be asked for it. Canada asks for it a lot, the United States, maybe, most other (western) countries, much less so.

By the way, Canada cannot refuse entry to a Canadian citizen/PR child due to a lack of a consent letter. CBSA officials can get law enforcement involved if they believe there is a case of child abduction, but they cannot refuse entry to Canada. They can refuse entry if the child is not a Canadian citizen/PR.

There are laws against child abduction, but these do not mandate a consent letter as a prerequisite to cross a frontier. However, such documentation can avoid a lot of questions IF they are asked. It should not be volunteered.

If you're traveling as a family, you do not need this kind of document.

And by the way, if your children are born in Canada they are Canadians by birth, not by descent.
JAJ is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 7:46 am
  #8  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Aviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond reputeAviator has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by JAJ
By the way, Canada cannot refuse entry to a Canadian citizen/PR child due to a lack of a consent letter. CBSA officials can get law enforcement involved if they believe there is a case of child abduction, but they cannot refuse entry to Canada. They can refuse entry if the child is not a Canadian citizen/PR.
Try standing your ground at the airport and telling them that. You'll be waiting until the next day for your lawyer to get you out.

Have you tried it and are speaking from experience?
Aviator is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 8:01 am
  #9  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Qc, Canada
Posts: 3,787
Shirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond reputeShirtback has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

I agree with JAJ on what the law stipulates.

I stand by my recommendation, with JAJ's proviso to only furnish it on request, to travel with documentary evidence of consent, if travelling without the other parent, or if children are travelling unaccompanied.
Shirtback is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 9:45 am
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 19,879
Siouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond reputeSiouxie has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
It's a North American thing. The pathetic thing is that, normally, nothing is checked when leaving, only when returning. If it was designed to prevent abductions, it is performed too late.

Such a letter is required if both parents are not travelling with the child. So, if only one of you is travelling, or if your child is travelling with others, a letter will be required.

It does not have to be notarised but is it better if it is. This is because anyone could sign the letter, pretending to be the person referred to. A Notary Public will check the ID of the signatory.

Here is a link that explains the Canadian procedure: Consent Travel Letter
Not really.

My former husband and I were both required to have signed letters and/or a court order allowing either of us to travel separately with our son, complete with dates, back in the 80's in the UK.
Siouxie is offline  
Old Feb 1st 2014, 3:16 pm
  #11  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Moving back with children policies?

Originally Posted by Siouxie
My former husband and I were both required to have signed letters and/or a court order allowing either of us to travel separately with our son, complete with dates, back in the 80's in the UK.
That is not typical in the U.K.
JAJ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.