Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > Immigration & Citizenship (Canada)
Reload this Page >

Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 28th 2014, 1:53 am
  #16  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
juliemcmahon is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

That is probably true, however I just joined today, and hopefully getting the right answers is better late than never.

Best,
Julie
juliemcmahon is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 2:00 am
  #17  
Born again atheist
 
Novocastrian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by juliemcmahon
That is probably true, however I just joined today, and hopefully getting the right answers is better late than never.

Best,
Julie
But they're not right are they?
Novocastrian is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 2:04 am
  #18  
"In cruce vincam"
 
rivingtonpike's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Mill Bay, Vancouver Island
Posts: 3,232
rivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond reputerivingtonpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
But they're not right are they?
Julie says they are....
rivingtonpike is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 3:41 am
  #19  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Fredericton, NB
Posts: 85
davedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by Siouxie
+1

Any immigration consultant that tells you that you can continue to work on 'implied status' from an IEC work permit is to be avoided.

Once you obtain PNP nomination you could apply for a TWP, but you can't continue to work on implied status on an IEC.

There are several threads explaining why you can't.

http://britishexpats.com/forum/immig...us-iec-815262/
Hi, do you know by any chance if PGWP holders can continue to work on implied status? Thank you.
davedba is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 7:51 am
  #20  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
christmasoompa's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: In a darkened room somewhere.............
Posts: 34,030
christmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by juliemcmahon
That is probably true, however I just joined today, and hopefully getting the right answers is better late than never.

Best,
Julie
Welcome to BE. It's not really the done thing to bump such old threads, even if you're just trying to help. Also please don't put your work info in your posts, as it looks rather like you're touting for business - see site rule 9, you can put info in your sig.

If you could read the Newcomers to the Forum sticky thread that would be fab, thanks.

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
But they're not right are they?
m

Which bit do you think isn't right?
christmasoompa is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 7:52 am
  #21  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
christmasoompa's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: In a darkened room somewhere.............
Posts: 34,030
christmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by davedba
Hi, do you know by any chance if PGWP holders can continue to work on implied status? Thank you.
If applying for what? Highly unlikely I'd say, as a PGWP can't be extended either. But tell us what you've actually applied for and hopefully somebody will be able to help.
christmasoompa is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 6:12 pm
  #22  
Born again atheist
 
Novocastrian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by christmasoompa

Which bit do you think isn't right?
1) or IEP?
Novocastrian is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 7:30 pm
  #23  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
christmasoompa's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: In a darkened room somewhere.............
Posts: 34,030
christmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by Novocastrian
1) or IEP?
Ah. I took that to just be a typo for IEC.
christmasoompa is offline  
Old Oct 28th 2014, 8:02 pm
  #24  
Born again atheist
 
Novocastrian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Europe (to be specified).
Posts: 30,259
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by christmasoompa
Ah. I took that to just be a typo for IEC.
Oh. You're probably right. I was just being grumpy.
Novocastrian is offline  
Old Oct 29th 2014, 1:54 am
  #25  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Fredericton, NB
Posts: 85
davedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by christmasoompa
If applying for what? Highly unlikely I'd say, as a PGWP can't be extended either. But tell us what you've actually applied for and hopefully somebody will be able to help.
Thank you for your response. I'm on a PGWP expiring January 1, 2015, applied for BC PNP under the International Graduate Stream back in July. However the processing times now are 8-9 months as per Welcome BC - Processing Times

Thank you.
davedba is offline  
Old Oct 29th 2014, 8:12 am
  #26  
SUPER MODERATOR
 
christmasoompa's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: In a darkened room somewhere.............
Posts: 34,030
christmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond reputechristmasoompa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by davedba
Thank you for your response. I'm on a PGWP expiring January 1, 2015, applied for BC PNP under the International Graduate Stream back in July. However the processing times now are 8-9 months as per Welcome BC - Processing Times

Thank you.
OK, so in my layman's opinion, you wouldn't qualify for implied status, as you haven't applied to extend anything, but rather applied for a whole new type of visa.

HTH.
christmasoompa is offline  
Old Oct 29th 2014, 3:41 pm
  #27  
Concierge
 
SchnookoLoly's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Oakville, ON, CA
Posts: 8,320
SchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond reputeSchnookoLoly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

I think I've read elsewhere that IEC and PWGP are the two programs that aren't applicable for applied status as neither visa is extendible, which is the main barrier with implied status.
SchnookoLoly is offline  
Old Oct 30th 2014, 3:25 am
  #28  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Fredericton, NB
Posts: 85
davedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond reputedavedba has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Immigration Lawyer Catherine Sas- opinions?

Originally Posted by christmasoompa
OK, so in my layman's opinion, you wouldn't qualify for implied status, as you haven't applied to extend anything, but rather applied for a whole new type of visa.

HTH.
thank you
davedba is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.