Has CIC Fallen back asleep
#31
Re: Has CIC Fallen back aslee
The change of government in October (with a manifesto promise to sort out immigration delays) and the influx of 25000 Syrian refugees at around the same time meant all staff were moved onto processing them - I gather they are well over halfway through that job now - had an impact by adding 6 months to the wait. They also appear to have changed the processing system to allow processing to be done anywhere in the world rather than in the country of application so there is hope it will speed up. For Jan '16 applications they were predicting an 11 year wait for Parent/Grandparent class applications for PR though!!
Christmasoompa
Where did you get the notion that older applicants are placed at the bottom of the pile ?
The CIC website says that applications are processed " in order of receipt "
Have you experience of CIC processing ? I cannot believe that it is left to the caseworker to decide which application to work on next.
Where did you get the notion that older applicants are placed at the bottom of the pile ?
The CIC website says that applications are processed " in order of receipt "
Have you experience of CIC processing ? I cannot believe that it is left to the caseworker to decide which application to work on next.
We have been in Canada for 2 years on the Super Visa. Last week we went to the border to have it extended for another 2 years. We were told by the immigration officer that the Super Visa was not for Brits and Americans...it was for people from countries like China and India. We were also told that people using the SV are not temporary residents...they are visitors. I said that was not how I understood the SV. The IO asked us to sit down as he would have to read up about it.
We must have entered Canada several dozens times and have only come across one IO that knows what the SV is.
In the end we came away with a 1 year extension...we were told our PR application was well under way and we probably wouldn't need longer than 12 months. We will see.
#32
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Christmasoompa
Where did you get the notion that older applicants are placed at the bottom of the pile ?
The CIC website says that applications are processed " in order of receipt "
Have you experience of CIC processing ? I cannot believe that it is left to the caseworker to decide which application to work on next.
Where did you get the notion that older applicants are placed at the bottom of the pile ?
The CIC website says that applications are processed " in order of receipt "
Have you experience of CIC processing ? I cannot believe that it is left to the caseworker to decide which application to work on next.
So applications are processed in turn, but depending on the visa type, that could mean a processing time of as little as 4 months, or as long as 8 years.
HTH.
#33
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 86
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Many thanks for the explanation
#34
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2014
Location: Mid Wales
Posts: 41
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Re the 11 years mentioned in my last post
Using links from the CIC website when I looked at it just before our application went in this year (2016) the processing times for a PGP application via the London Visa office were given as 48 months for approval of sponsor and a further 62 months for PR decision but that went up to 84 months the same day our Immigration Lawyer told us the quota had been increased from 5,000 to 10,000 each year. 48 months plus 84 months is 11 years!
Within a week the website seemed to change and it now looks to me as if the only way to get a 'forecast' of processing time is by using the application number issued by CIC. 13 weeks since our application went in (before 0930 on the opening date for them) but we have still not had any acknowledgement that it was, or was not, accepted within the quota for 2016.
We were told initially that we'd be informed in 4-6 weeks of success in getting it in, and our Immigration Lawyer is confident it did get into the quota, but until we get that CIC number we are now apparently in limbo. He did suggest the system might get back to normal near the end of March or early April after the effects of the change of Gov't had settled.
Using links from the CIC website when I looked at it just before our application went in this year (2016) the processing times for a PGP application via the London Visa office were given as 48 months for approval of sponsor and a further 62 months for PR decision but that went up to 84 months the same day our Immigration Lawyer told us the quota had been increased from 5,000 to 10,000 each year. 48 months plus 84 months is 11 years!
Within a week the website seemed to change and it now looks to me as if the only way to get a 'forecast' of processing time is by using the application number issued by CIC. 13 weeks since our application went in (before 0930 on the opening date for them) but we have still not had any acknowledgement that it was, or was not, accepted within the quota for 2016.
We were told initially that we'd be informed in 4-6 weeks of success in getting it in, and our Immigration Lawyer is confident it did get into the quota, but until we get that CIC number we are now apparently in limbo. He did suggest the system might get back to normal near the end of March or early April after the effects of the change of Gov't had settled.
#35
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Re the 11 years mentioned in my last post
Using links from the CIC website when I looked at it just before our application went in this year (2016) the processing times for a PGP application via the London Visa office were given as 48 months for approval of sponsor and a further 62 months for PR decision but that went up to 84 months the same day our Immigration Lawyer told us the quota had been increased from 5,000 to 10,000 each year. 48 months plus 84 months is 11 years!
Within a week the website seemed to change and it now looks to me as if the only way to get a 'forecast' of processing time is by using the application number issued by CIC. 13 weeks since our application went in (before 0930 on the opening date for them) but we have still not had any acknowledgement that it was, or was not, accepted within the quota for 2016.
We were told initially that we'd be informed in 4-6 weeks of success in getting it in, and our Immigration Lawyer is confident it did get into the quota, but until we get that CIC number we are now apparently in limbo. He did suggest the system might get back to normal near the end of March or early April after the effects of the change of Gov't had settled.
Using links from the CIC website when I looked at it just before our application went in this year (2016) the processing times for a PGP application via the London Visa office were given as 48 months for approval of sponsor and a further 62 months for PR decision but that went up to 84 months the same day our Immigration Lawyer told us the quota had been increased from 5,000 to 10,000 each year. 48 months plus 84 months is 11 years!
Within a week the website seemed to change and it now looks to me as if the only way to get a 'forecast' of processing time is by using the application number issued by CIC. 13 weeks since our application went in (before 0930 on the opening date for them) but we have still not had any acknowledgement that it was, or was not, accepted within the quota for 2016.
We were told initially that we'd be informed in 4-6 weeks of success in getting it in, and our Immigration Lawyer is confident it did get into the quota, but until we get that CIC number we are now apparently in limbo. He did suggest the system might get back to normal near the end of March or early April after the effects of the change of Gov't had settled.
It seems many of the Jan 2014 applicants received acknowledgement after approx 6 months. Took over 2 years before our file said the application is in progress. As I said above our sponsor has been approved...although the CIC haven't informed us yet. How up to date their notices are is anyone's guess.
#36
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2014
Location: Mid Wales
Posts: 41
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Our PGP application got our sponsors approval 2 weeks ago, but they were both Canadian Civil Servants so it must have been easy to process them. Now we are ostensibly on the final step in the journey
Our application has been referred to the London office. Are processing times there any better than they used to be?
I noticed a thread, closed in 2014, about the address details needed saying they needed details of not just the last 10 years, as per the form requirements, but everything since age 18. Our Immigration Adviser (known to be wrong on some things!) said only 10 years were needed when we started to apply in Dec 15. Does this still apply? Be a hell of a problem for my OH as she moved 28 times in both Aus and UK and can't remember some of them.
Our application has been referred to the London office. Are processing times there any better than they used to be?
I noticed a thread, closed in 2014, about the address details needed saying they needed details of not just the last 10 years, as per the form requirements, but everything since age 18. Our Immigration Adviser (known to be wrong on some things!) said only 10 years were needed when we started to apply in Dec 15. Does this still apply? Be a hell of a problem for my OH as she moved 28 times in both Aus and UK and can't remember some of them.
#37
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Our PGP application got our sponsors approval 2 weeks ago, but they were both Canadian Civil Servants so it must have been easy to process them. Now we are ostensibly on the final step in the journey
Our application has been referred to the London office. Are processing times there any better than they used to be?
I noticed a thread, closed in 2014, about the address details needed saying they needed details of not just the last 10 years, as per the form requirements, but everything since age 18. Our Immigration Adviser (known to be wrong on some things!) said only 10 years were needed when we started to apply in Dec 15. Does this still apply? Be a hell of a problem for my OH as she moved 28 times in both Aus and UK and can't remember some of them.
Our application has been referred to the London office. Are processing times there any better than they used to be?
I noticed a thread, closed in 2014, about the address details needed saying they needed details of not just the last 10 years, as per the form requirements, but everything since age 18. Our Immigration Adviser (known to be wrong on some things!) said only 10 years were needed when we started to apply in Dec 15. Does this still apply? Be a hell of a problem for my OH as she moved 28 times in both Aus and UK and can't remember some of them.
#38
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 100
Re: Has CIC Fallen back asleep
Its summer - everyone has gone cottaging!