Wikiposts

anyone who can answer this

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 9th 2005, 4:19 pm
  #1  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
anna25 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default anyone who can answer this

hi

i am quebec investor and i have already gotten my csq and my medicals from buffalo. i want to ask how much longer is it gonna take for the passport request. i did my medicas in early aug and from wat i know buffalo got my meds in early october.
anna25 is offline  
Old Nov 10th 2005, 11:06 am
  #2  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
anna25 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

any one ???
anna25 is offline  
Old Nov 10th 2005, 12:05 pm
  #3  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Andrew Miller is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Anywhere between 6 months to 3+ years. Look here for reported average timelines for Quebec Business class cases that were completed (visas issued) between October 2004 and September 2005.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/departm...iness-que.html

Note that for next few years processing times will be quite longer than reported on above page.

Originally Posted by anna25
hi

i am quebec investor and i have already gotten my csq and my medicals from buffalo. i want to ask how much longer is it gonna take for the passport request. i did my medicas in early aug and from wat i know buffalo got my meds in early october.
Andrew Miller is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 12:13 pm
  #4  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Originally Posted by Andrew Miller
Anywhere between 6 months to 3+ years. Look here for reported average timelines for Quebec Business class cases that were completed (visas issued) between October 2004 and September 2005.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/departm...iness-que.html

Note that for next few years processing times will be quite longer than reported on above page.


Why should that (presuming you refer to the "settlement") affect Quebec cases?

The Canada-Quebec Accord imposes certain obligations on CIC to process Quebec cases and I doubt the Quebec government, or federal MPs for Quebec ridings, will be understanding if they don't.



Jeremy
JAJ is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 12:39 pm
  #5  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Andrew Miller is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Jeremy,

Settlement cases have the highest priority as per court approved settlement and it's imposed deadlines. Nothing can overwrite terms of settlement. CIC is processing all cases, including Quebec, but with lower priority than settlement cases. Current priority order in skilled workers classes is as follows - (1) settlement cases, (2) PNP cases (including Quebec at par with other PNP's), (3) federal skilled workers with HRSDC approved job offers and (4) federal skilled workers without job offers.

As for politicians, especially MP's - they have election coming any day now (we may find out when as soon as this week) and after election they may not even be in office, so their worries are to be re-elected, nothing else matters. But regardles - they cannot overwrite court approved terms and deadlines of settlement.

After election they will have to figure out what to do with about 800,000 applications strong backlog. If you remember when government was introducing IRPA over 4 years ago and pushing in through Parliament they were blaming old Immigration Act for "huge" then (4 years ago) 400,000 cases backlog. The very same government lowered pass mark 2 years ago and it resulted in 800,000 now strong backlog. Someone will have to deal with it and it won't be pretty...


Originally Posted by JAJ
Why should that (presuming you refer to the "settlement") affect Quebec cases?

The Canada-Quebec Accord imposes certain obligations on CIC to process Quebec cases and I doubt the Quebec government, or federal MPs for Quebec ridings, will be understanding if they don't.



Jeremy
Andrew Miller is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 1:31 pm
  #6  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Originally Posted by Andrew Miller
Jeremy,

Settlement cases have the highest priority as per court approved settlement and it's imposed deadlines. Nothing can overwrite terms of settlement. CIC is processing all cases, including Quebec, but with lower priority than settlement cases. Current priority order in skilled workers classes is as follows - (1) settlement cases, (2) PNP cases (including Quebec at par with other PNP's), (3) federal skilled workers with HRSDC approved job offers and (4) federal skilled workers without job offers.
CIC ought to be able to deliver the Quebec and PNP numbers even if they are 'second priority'. These cases generally require much less processing resource anyway and it ought to be easy to fit them in between 'settlement' cases.

That said, it makes things even more difficult for regular federal cases without job offer.

As for politicians, especially MP's - they have election coming any day now (we may find out when as soon as this week) and after election they may not even be in office, so their worries are to be re-elected, nothing else matters. But regardles - they cannot overwrite court approved terms and deadlines of settlement.
After the election there will still be 70 or so federal MPs from Quebec, and there'll still be a Quebec government expecting CIC to live up to its commitments.

We will have to see from the statistics whether Quebec/PNP processing times rise substantially in the months ahead.

After election they will have to figure out what to do with about 800,000 applications strong backlog. If you remember when government was introducing IRPA over 4 years ago and pushing in through Parliament they were blaming old Immigration Act for "huge" then (4 years ago) 400,000 cases backlog. The very same government lowered pass mark 2 years ago and it resulted in 800,000 now strong backlog. Someone will have to deal with it and it won't be pretty...

One wonders why they didn't just simply sort out the "settlement" issue by passing retrospective legislation, like New Zealand did a few years ago.

As to the backlog now, agree that there seems to be pressure building up which sooner or later will lead to some radical changes. However it ought not to affect Quebec/PNP cases unduly.



Jeremy
JAJ is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 3:29 pm
  #7  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Andrew Miller is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Jeremy,

Federal government has no obligations not commitments as Quebec immigration levels are concerned. Canada - Quebec Accord doesn't have a word "guarantee" when it comes to level of immigration for Quebec. Please read section B in the outline of the Accord on Canadian Parliament's website here:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...bs/bp252-e.htm

Exact wording from the above is:

"Canada remains responsible for establishing levels of immigration annually, taking into account Quebec’s advice on the number of immigrants that it wants to receive"

"Taking advice into account" is not a guarantee nor commitment of any kind.


Originally Posted by JAJ
CIC ought to be able to deliver the Quebec and PNP numbers even if they are 'second priority'.
<snip>

After the election there will still be 70 or so federal MPs from Quebec, and there'll still be a Quebec government expecting CIC to live up to its commitments.

Jeremy
Andrew Miller is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 5:55 pm
  #8  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
anna25 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

hmmm.. i would have thought that they would give priority to investors as they are bringing substantial amount of investment in to canada.
anna25 is offline  
Old Nov 13th 2005, 7:11 pm
  #9  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Andrew Miller is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Unfortunately we are dealing with bureaucrats...
And the only logic they use is the one that suits them.

Originally Posted by anna25
hmmm.. i would have thought that they would give priority to investors as they are bringing substantial amount of investment in to canada.
Andrew Miller is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2005, 1:02 am
  #10  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
RKDennis is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Originally Posted by anna25
hmmm.. i would have thought that they would give priority to investors as they are bringing substantial amount of investment in to canada.
That would make sense, but it dosen't work that. Look at the processing times for the Business Class, 3 years for 50% in all regions. In the Africa / Mid East Region, Damascus requires 62 months for 50% and up to 76 for 80%.
RKDennis is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2005, 1:33 pm
  #11  
JAJ
Retired
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,649
JAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond reputeJAJ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

Originally Posted by Andrew Miller
Jeremy,

Federal government has no obligations not commitments as Quebec immigration levels are concerned. Canada - Quebec Accord doesn't have a word "guarantee" when it comes to level of immigration for Quebec. Please read section B in the outline of the Accord on Canadian Parliament's website here:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/li...bs/bp252-e.htm

Exact wording from the above is:

"Canada remains responsible for establishing levels of immigration annually, taking into account Quebec’s advice on the number of immigrants that it wants to receive"

"Taking advice into account" is not a guarantee nor commitment of any kind.


It would be a non-starter politically for CIC to tell the Quebec government its immigration allocation is being reduced because of a 'settlement' that is unrelated to Quebec.




Jeremy
JAJ is offline  
Old Nov 14th 2005, 1:39 pm
  #12  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,984
Andrew Miller is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: anyone who can answer this

The truth is that there is nothing what current federal government can do to alienate Quebec more than they already did with current scandal.

Originally Posted by JAJ
It would be a non-starter politically for CIC to tell the Quebec government its immigration allocation is being reduced because of a 'settlement' that is unrelated to Quebec.




Jeremy
Andrew Miller is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.