British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   France (https://britishexpats.com/forum/france-76/)
-   -   Taxes (https://britishexpats.com/forum/france-76/taxes-878112/)

Chatter Static Jun 1st 2016 5:21 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by dmu (Post 11962017)
Yes, we eventually get back what we pay in (social charges): healthcare, pensions, dole, family allowances, etc...., whereas "Taxes" contribute to the State Coffers and are never seen again, at least directly.

They certainly don't fill pot holes with it.....

Pulaski Jun 1st 2016 6:35 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by dmu (Post 11962017)
Yes, we eventually get back what we pay in (social charges): healthcare, pensions, dole, family allowances, etc. .....

Only if you have average income and are an average user of government supplied services.

The reality is that most countries taxation scheme is redistributive, more-so in some countries than others, so many people receive back much less than they pay in.

InVinoVeritas Jun 1st 2016 7:13 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Chatter Static (Post 11962021)
They certainly don't fill pot holes with it.....

...but they do buy lots of those flashy camera things :sneaky:

Chatter Static Jun 1st 2016 8:11 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by InVinoVeritas (Post 11962155)
...but they do buy lots of those flashy camera things :sneaky:

Bloody useless for passport photos....... The photos can take weeks to turn up.

TinaBee Jun 1st 2016 8:53 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Ilya1 (Post 11960387)
. . . He owns nothing. We will obviously have to change that too but my point is that marriage certificate is a pointless paper.


. . . we will defer our plan by 2/3 years. thank you to everyone who responded.

If/when you do relocate to France, be sure to get advice on France's tax treatment of trusts and inheritance.

Pulaski Jun 1st 2016 9:30 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Chatter Static (Post 11962212)
Bloody useless for passport photos....... The photos can take weeks to turn up.

If ever. I have seen a number of flashes, in my mirror, but I've never received a picture. :thumbsup:

Chatter Static Jun 1st 2016 6:22 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 11962288)
If ever. I have seen a number of flashes, in my mirror, but I've never received a picture. :thumbsup:

Now days you have to be more concerned about average speed checks....

Ilya1 Jun 3rd 2016 3:38 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by TinaBee (Post 11962253)
If/when you do relocate to France, be sure to get advice on France's tax treatment of trusts and inheritance.

Yes, a 1% or so tax on assets of trusts.
Also the UK scheme is just deferred taxation and low returns in the long interim. It's a pretty bad financial decision to be honest and a scam for all practical purposes. Just like tax free UK pension deductions are a scam, or at least were as they forced everyone to buy annuities for 75% of the pot. Now that the available tax free amount has reduced, even the appearance of good intent has been removed. I could go on and on.
For the tax paid, France gives back something at least. The UK with its culture of institutional incompetence can't give anything decent back. Just spews garbage back at you with their state schools and NHS. Unless you were terminally ill, the NHS is just useless. It's better to pay slightly higher tax in Scandinavia as the state at least gives something worthwhile back.
For us though, it's just not worth it at current juncture.

Ilya1 Jun 3rd 2016 3:56 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by InVinoVeritas (Post 11961728)
I'm a little late into this thread which has achieved orbit incredibly quickly!

No one has mentioned the right, available to couples in France, in the year of their marriage (or PACS) or upon arrival in France, to be taxed separately. This may mean Ilya1's husband could instead pay tax in another country (providing he is not resident in France) and send remittances to Ilya1 by way of maintenance.

Yes, but it's a minefield. While the father could visit the family, he should not visit too often (subjective), the family shouldn't holiday together (in france or abroad), social visits should largely be independent. Else the taxman will argue that the spouse abroad is emotionally invested as a resident in France and must pay taxes here. I kid you not, UK also follows this sort of test. It's not just based on days spent....and one needs to be prepared to talk separation emotionally too as the tax authorities definately use that as a last recourse and one must be prepared for a judicial review.

InVinoVeritas Jun 3rd 2016 4:28 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Ilya1 (Post 11964503)
Yes, but it's a minefield. While the father could visit the family, he should not visit too often (subjective), the family shouldn't holiday together (in france or abroad), social visits should largely be independent. Else the taxman will argue that the spouse abroad is emotionally invested as a resident in France and must pay taxes here. I kid you not, UK also follows this sort of test. It's not just based on days spent....and one needs to be prepared to talk separation emotionally too as the tax authorities definately use that as a last recourse and one must be prepared for a judicial review.

Hi Ilya - did you get professional advice on this? I know of two notaires who are married under "separation de biens", work in the same office, each have their own principal residence in the same town and they are taxed separately. He tells me that it is not at all uncommon in professional circles in France as it allows a lot of tax "optimisation".

Ilya1 Jun 3rd 2016 5:49 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by InVinoVeritas (Post 11964505)
Hi Ilya - did you get professional advice on this? I know of two notaires who are married under "separation de biens", work in the same office, each have their own principal residence in the same town and they are taxed separately. He tells me that it is not at all uncommon in professional circles in France as it allows a lot of tax "optimisation".

Yes, tax optimisation is one thing and the different between the 2 regimes for these guys is not much as it's only the first few bands that are different. Not like hundreds of thousands of euros. In our case of one working (literally zero tax in a low tax jurisdiction) and another non working spouse, there is a huge incentive for tax authorities to be very aggressive as the differential is worth their time.

We were told that we must be ready to go all the way to a judicial review for this. Not worth it. We don't need to be in france so we will relocate at a more appropriate time i guess. We had pretty much planned out everything and had relocation advance paid etc. and now have to cancel on the move.

InVinoVeritas Jun 3rd 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Ilya1 (Post 11964532)
Yes, tax optimisation is one thing and the different between the 2 regimes for these guys is not much as it's only the first few bands that are different. Not like hundreds of thousands of euros. In our case of one working (literally zero tax in a low tax jurisdiction) and another non working spouse, there is a huge incentive for tax authorities to be very aggressive as the differential is worth their time.

We were told that we must be ready to go all the way to a judicial review for this. Not worth it. We don't need to be in france so we will relocate at a more appropriate time i guess. We had pretty much planned out everything and had relocation advance paid etc. and now have to cancel on the move.

I think your view is overly cautious - I'm not sure how good your French is but this review of mixed tax residence by an international tax lawyer is well worth reading:-

« Couples mixtes » ou de l’impact de la globalisation sur la fiscalité des ménages | Publication Detail | CMS Bureau Francis Lefebvre

Incidentally, I have never come across the word "casuistique" before in French and there is no direct translation into English. "Flawed logic" seems to be the nearest equivalent and it is how he describes the Fisc's approach to mixed residence.

Pulaski Jun 4th 2016 1:15 am

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by InVinoVeritas (Post 11964581)
I think your view is overly cautious - I'm not sure how good your French is but this review of mixed tax residence by an international tax lawyer is well worth reading:-

« Couples mixtes » ou de l’impact de la globalisation sur la fiscalité des ménages | Publication Detail | CMS Bureau Francis Lefebvre

Incidentally, I have never come across the word "casuistique" before in French and there is no direct translation into English. "Flawed logic" seems to be the nearest equivalent and it is how he describes the Fisc's approach to mixed residence.

Surely "casuistry" would be the translation? I am not sure if English has an adjectival form. :unsure:

"Sophistry" would be another alternative.

Ilya1 Jun 4th 2016 6:11 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by InVinoVeritas (Post 11964581)
I think your view is overly cautious - I'm not sure how good your French is but this review of mixed tax residence by an international tax lawyer is well worth reading:-

« Couples mixtes » ou de l’impact de la globalisation sur la fiscalité des ménages | Publication Detail | CMS Bureau Francis Lefebvre

Incidentally, I have never come across the word "casuistique" before in French and there is no direct translation into English. "Flawed logic" seems to be the nearest equivalent and it is how he describes the Fisc's approach to mixed residence.

The meaning is "case by case basis" ;). Thank you for the link. It reaffirms what i was told. The precedents mentioned about greek husband and french
wife make it pretty clear. it would be decided by the tax judge as i was told. Kids studying in france makes it an open and shut case for them. high income, no tax in other jurisdiction means we must contribute our "fair" share. so we would show the :thumbs_down: . We would immigrate when we are "technically" as useful as their average guy and pay whatever is the "fair" share.

InVinoVeritas Jun 4th 2016 6:50 pm

Re: Taxes
 

Originally Posted by Ilya1 (Post 11965140)
The meaning is "case by case basis" ;). Thank you for the link. It reaffirms what i was told. The precedents mentioned about greek husband and french
wife make it pretty clear. it would be decided by the tax judge as i was told. Kids studying in france makes it an open and shut case for them. high income, no tax in other jurisdiction means we must contribute our "fair" share. so we would show the :thumbs_down: . We would immigrate when we are "technically" as useful as their average guy and pay whatever is the "fair" share.

Yes I think having kids in French school could be a problem, it ties you down and makes you an easier target. Many notaires and avocats are using this "optimisation" device but then they are quite comfortable with arguing their case before a judge (who is probably doing the same thing him/herself ;))


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:21 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.