Flood Levy

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 27th 2011, 10:52 am
  #91  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188
iamthecreaturefromuranus is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by hevs
I'm a woman, its my job
If a man speaks in a forest, and there is no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?
iamthecreaturefromuranus is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 10:52 am
  #92  
BE Enthusiast
 
BigH68's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 403
BigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud ofBigH68 has much to be proud of
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by scotdownunder
Unfortunately in a lot of instances it is is because in the (extremely) fine print these companies stipulate they will not cover for river floods only flash floods, so people often think they are covered for an event when they are not - hence they wriggle out of it legally (but not morally in my view - you would think a flood is a flood right?).
I wouldn't be a bit surprised though if a lot of insurance companies find people cancelling or not renewing their policies now they realise they are not worth the soggy paper they are written on...
but its up to us to read the fine print before we commit
BigH68 is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 10:53 am
  #93  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by The Bloke
Speaking of flight attendents, have we ever stopped paying the Ansett levy introduced by Howard?
See post 73.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 10:55 am
  #94  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by BigH68
It doesnt matter if it is only for a year...so many people have given very generously to flood appeals etc etc that have been going on for weeks, which has been their choice and generocity..this is just bull shit
The appeals were for the affected people.

The levy is for government reconstruction of major infrastructure stuff to keep the nation going - railroads, bridges etc.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 10:58 am
  #95  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
ozzieeagle's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,526
ozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

I wonder if we would have seen as many complaints if the Net had been around, when Howards gun buy back levy was on.

I reckon thats where Gillard must have got the idea from.

It will be for one year, Anything extra will be politcal suicide.

Theres a Carbon Levy waiting in the wings though. Now that one I will be against.
ozzieeagle is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 11:09 am
  #96  
High in the Dandenongs
 
hevs's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Listening to Puffing Billy
Posts: 9,183
hevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond reputehevs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
If a man speaks in a forest, and there is no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?
You need to ask?
hevs is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 11:58 am
  #97  
MODERATOR
 
cresta57's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Redneck Wonderland
Posts: 9,932
cresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond reputecresta57 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Levy's for levees sweet
cresta57 is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 12:02 pm
  #98  
221b Baker Street
 
Sherlock Holmes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Miles from anywhere, Victoria, Australia.
Posts: 14,125
Sherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond reputeSherlock Holmes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by cresta57
Levy's for levees sweet
Levys for art's sake...
Sherlock Holmes is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 12:16 pm
  #99  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 2,237
HelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
But... but... they're Howard's battlers! How will they afford an extra $5 per week for 12 months?!
Originally Posted by hevs
With about 1/2 as much difficulty as those earning under that?!
The trouble is, those on roughly $100k mostly do not get any benefits, such as FTA, FTB, Education Tax Rebate, etc. This group are busy paying out for others, but get little back and a lot in this category are struggling. The govt and general community really need to forget about $100k being a high salary for a family, or that someone on this salary is rich. I also know that others in a much better financial situation can claim all sorts of costs and reduce their apparent income so that they do qualify for these benefits. It is the group in the middle that seem to pay for everyone else, even the rich.

Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
Well said. Hockey has dismissed the levy as "dumb", but I don't hear any alternative proposals. Meanwhile, Colin Barnett is supporting the levy in defiance of Abbott!
Colin Barnett needs some of the funds to repair damage caused by floods in the Carnarvon area, very important for fruit & veg supplies to the rest of WA.

Last edited by HelenTD; Jan 27th 2011 at 12:22 pm.
HelenTD is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 1:23 pm
  #100  
(It's not my real name)
 
renth's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Ilukapool. WA
Posts: 12,467
renth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond reputerenth has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by HelenTD
Colin Barnett needs some of the funds to repair damage caused by floods in the Carnarvon area, very important for fruit & veg supplies to the rest of WA.
I heard on the news that Carnarvon won't be getting any of the money despite its agricultural industry getting decimated.
renth is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 1:42 pm
  #101  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Cheshire>Townsville
Posts: 232
John_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud ofJohn_R has much to be proud of
Default Re: Flood Levy

How about fining the local councils for giving planning permission to build on flood plains. I hear it's supposed to be only for a year, the Germans were told that when solidaritry tax was brought in when the wall came down, their still paying!!

John
John_R is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 2:02 pm
  #102  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by John_R
How about fining the local councils for giving planning permission to build on flood plains. I hear it's supposed to be only for a year, the Germans were told that when solidaritry tax was brought in when the wall came down, their still paying!!

John
wouldn't help re the levy....the levy is for major infrastructure like bridges and rail lines - not for houses on flood plains - those people have lost their money.

All John Howard's levies have been discontinued.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 2:13 pm
  #103  
You sip .... I glug !!!
 
Vegemite Kids's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Over the hill!
Posts: 2,790
Vegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by cresta57
Levy's for levees sweet
They have to raise the levy cos the levee failed


Personally I dont have a problem with paying this, happy to do so. Thats the benefit of federation - states dont have to go it alone in times of emergency / disaster, and who knows in a few years time it could be my area needing assistance.


But...I do have a few concerns

1. I am concerned that only QLD has been mentioned so far. As others have said, will the flood affected infrastructure in NSW, VIC, SA, WA also be covered by this? and if not, why not? If its only QLD then its an unfair levy to the other affected areas, especially northern NSW.

2. I am concerned that the owners of the multi multi million dollar mansions overlooking the Brisbane river will be exempted from this. Yes they are flood affected, but they're still probably in a better situation financially than 99.9% of Australians to pay this levy.

3. I am concerned that single income families will be hit harder for this levy than dual income families. (i.e 1x income of $110 will pay so much more extra tax than 2x income of $55k each) But I guess thats just taxation all over.

4. I am concerned that some people will use it as an excuse to stop giving donations to the flood affected people and deliberately 'misunderstand' the purpose of the levy. Also that existing non-flood related charities will be affected by that misunderstanding.
Vegemite Kids is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 2:18 pm
  #104  
Home and Happy
 
Pollyana's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,814
Pollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond reputePollyana has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

The Body Shop seems to have introduced its own flood levy - don't know if its everywhere, but the staff in the Queen Street mall have been told to suggest to every customer that they should round up their purchase to the next $ and give the change to the flood appeal. Not many customers that are going to say No when confronted with that at the till are there ;rolleyes: Although the woman next to me said in that case she was changing from cash to paying by card so that there was no change

I object to that kind of charity giving, its like the people who come up to you in the pub and shake a tin under your nose. I give when i want to who I want, I don't want to be made to feel obliged to give.
Pollyana is offline  
Old Jan 27th 2011, 2:25 pm
  #105  
You sip .... I glug !!!
 
Vegemite Kids's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Over the hill!
Posts: 2,790
Vegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond reputeVegemite Kids has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flood Levy

Originally Posted by John_R
How about fining the local councils for giving planning permission to build on flood plains. I hear it's supposed to be only for a year, the Germans were told that when solidaritry tax was brought in when the wall came down, their still paying!!

John


We lived in Germany for 5 years prior to moving to OZ and I have to say the vast majority of Germans that we knew understood why the tax had not be removed and as such were willing to continuing paying it.

BTW, Its a totally different situation and you are comparing apples to carrots by even mentioning it.
Vegemite Kids is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.