![]() |
tax and relocation package
Hi,
My partner was offered a lump sum as part of his relocation package, but actually he has only received around 50% of it, the rest has gone to the taxman. This relocation package has to be paid back to the company in case he doesn't work for them for at least 2 years. In case he does not complete these 2 years, does he have to pay back the total of the lump sum to the company and then claim the taxes he paid to the tax office?? or does he have to pay back to the company only the money that he received? ? I've asked in the tax office and the reply was: "I dont know what you're talking about" :unsure: Thanks |
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by daiske
(Post 10197157)
In case he does not complete these 2 years, does he have to pay back the total of the lump sum to the company and then claim the taxes he paid to the tax office?? |
Re: tax and relocation package
Thanks JonBoyE
It is not that he is planning to leave his job (we've just arrived), but it is good to know it just in case. Taxman has taken 55% of the relocation package...grrrrr... |
Re: tax and relocation package
That sounds pretty unusual so it must be something they have defined in their contract and it sounds like it would be full amount. How tight.
By the way you will get some of that tax back at tax return time. You seem to get taxed a bit higher as an out of band lump payment, at least I was and got back. |
Re: tax and relocation package
It seems like a lot, not sure if they have done it right cause the sum wasn't very high. We' ll see if we can get some of it back.
|
Re: tax and relocation package
im not a tax expert but isn't this classed as business expense?..therefore subject to different tax rules..it should not be classed as income?
|
Re: tax and relocation package
Presumably any discrepancy will end up coming out in the wash when the tax return is completed in the Spring.
Welcome to Canada eh... |
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 10204807)
im not a tax expert but isn't this classed as business expense?..therefore subject to different tax rules..it should not be classed as income?
|
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 10204807)
im not a tax expert but isn't this classed as business expense?..therefore subject to different tax rules..it should not be classed as income?
If you get money from your employer, other than for reimbursement of expenses you have incurred, it is income. If you are an employee it is taxable unless you are living in Canada and move to be closer to work (within some conditions), then the income is taxable and the moving costs deductible. |
Re: tax and relocation package
What if payment is made while still resident in the UK and the receiver is an employee who doesn't file self assessment?
|
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by Aviator
(Post 10204866)
Not unless you are a business.
If you get money from your employer, other than for reimbursement of expenses you have incurred, it is income. If you are an employee it is taxable unless you are living in Canada and move to be closer to work (within some conditions), then the income is taxable and the moving costs deductible. |
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 10204919)
isn't relocation an expense that you have incurred?
|
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by cheeky_monkey
(Post 10204919)
isn't relocation an expense that you have incurred?
For the CRA rules to apply you have to already be a resident of Canada when you move, not moving to become one. If you receive the payment after becoming a tax resident in Canada, then it is taxable income. http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pbg/tf/t1-m/t1-m-11e.pdf If you meet the rules and can deduct expenses (with receipts) this can be claimed on the tax return and any money received from the employer reported as income. You cannot claim anything you paid prior to becoming a tax resident as it does not apply. If one balanaces the other out, you pay nothing, if their is a difference, you may pay more tax or get some pack from other income. If you receive the money whilst a tax resident elsewhere, their tax rules would apply and it could still become taxable income. What is better is if the company pays the actual bills direct to the moving companies, airlines and hotels. This may still be considered benefit in kind, but it may pass muster with CRA. |
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 10204918)
What if payment is made while still resident in the UK and the receiver is an employee who doesn't file self assessment?
Anybody :confused: |
Re: tax and relocation package
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 10205131)
^^^^
Anybody :confused: Sleep tight.;) |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:36 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.