![]() |
Restrictive Covenants...again
There are restrictive covenants on the new property, one of which is that it has to be landscaped within 3 years of construction. It is presently 18 months old.
What are the implications if the property is not landscaped within that time. The lot is leveled and ready for topsoil and sod but as it is over an acre, this could/will be costly. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Hi
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 8425184)
There are restrictive covenants on the new property, one of which is that it has to be landscaped within 3 years of construction. It is presently 18 months old.
What are the implications if the property is not landscaped within that time. The lot is leveled and ready for topsoil and sod but as it is over an acre, this could/will be costly. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by PMM
(Post 8425203)
Hi
Depending who put covenant in the official plan, if it was the city/municipal they could do the work and charge you for it. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
You need to obtain a copy of the restrictive convenant to ascertain what the penalties will be.
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8425222)
You need to obtain a copy of the restrictive convenant to ascertain what the penalties will be.
As I have already chased my agent to get the vendors' agent to get the vendors to comply with getting final inspections and closing the open permits, I will get him to look into this too. Having done all the leg work myself in finding out from Rural Planning whether there were outstanding permits on electrical, plumbing, framing and basement along with final inspection, the Realtor said ' oh yeah, that can sometimes hold up closing '.... there's $7,000 well earned, glad I'm not paying him. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Amazing what Google turns up. Found something where a resident was constructing a particularly large garage and a planning decision was being appealed and noticed this section :
"The Appellants have further argued the Province of New Brunswick, and presumably by extension Rural Planning, is obligated to enforce restrictive covenants between a developer and a property owner which are contained in a deed. Even if the Third Party were in breach of any of the restrictive covenants contained in deed #XXXX, which was never established, as the deed itself recites these covenants are between the grantor (XYZ Ltd.) and the grantee (Mr & Mrs ABC), and subsequent purchasers. These are contractual agreements to which the Province, or its agents, are not party, and there is no legislation that obligates it to enforce these covenants." So it would seem it would be between the owner and the original developer. I will find out what the penalties are, if any are actually published. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 8425184)
There are restrictive covenants on the new property, one of which is that it has to be landscaped within 3 years of construction. It is presently 18 months old.
What are the implications if the property is not landscaped within that time. The lot is leveled and ready for topsoil and sod but as it is over an acre, this could/will be costly. |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by The Aviator
(Post 8425328)
Depends what is constituted as landscaping. Laying topsoil and turf is landscaping. If there are no specifics you may find you could well be able to argue it is done once the sod is down.
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 8425341)
I believe, or at least I read it as the laying of topsoil and sod, none of which is currently done. Having costed it out at some $25,000 to get done, I am merely enquiring about it in case Spring arrives next year and the coffers are momentarily bare.
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by R I C H
(Post 8425410)
Use seed instead of turf. As little as $150 of seed will cover an acre.
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 8425433)
What he said. We seeded 1/2 of our acre rather than sodding. Much cheaper and in many ways less hassle.
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 8425459)
Don't you just feed the birds ?
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Tangram
(Post 8425459)
Don't you just feed the birds ?
|
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 8425433)
What he said. We seeded 1/2 of our acre rather than sodding. Much cheaper and in many ways less hassle.
I know on the house that I have just bought - I have 6 months to have what they call Nursery Grade sods down on my lawn at the front of the house :confused: (It doesent say what I have to put in the back ) Not sure if this is driven by Paradise Town or the subdivision developers |
Re: Restrictive Covenants...again
Originally Posted by nldfc
(Post 8426944)
Was that on a new house ??
I know on the house that I have just bought - I have 6 months to have what they call Nursery Grade sods down on my lawn at the front of the house :confused: (It doesent say what I have to put in the back ) Not sure if this is driven by Paradise Town or the subdivision developers |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:55 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.