British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   Canada (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/)
-   -   Motorcycle licence Alberta (https://britishexpats.com/forum/canada-56/motorcycle-licence-alberta-646595/)

R I C H May 21st 2010 3:43 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Piff Poff (Post 8210235)
What concerns me is a 17 year old on say a GSXR 750 after just 20 hours (most of those in a car park going around cones) of learning, to me that is just plain irresponsible. I have one of those, it's not for a new inexperienced rider. I find it a handful (0-60mph in less than 3 seconds) after owning several sports bikes - my fave being a Ducati 900ss. I have always believed that every car driver should have to ride a bike before getting a car licence and bike licences should be graduated, I graduated myself, starting on a 50cc, then a 125cc, then a 350cc then upto to the bigger sports bikes.

It is of course different if you are on a cruiser, the power to weight ratio etc is very different giving different torque and the throttle reacts in different way, same goes for trails bikes etc.

Cubic capacity is pretty meaningless, as you suggest above. A 900ss is low powered for it's engine size - the current KTM's 600cc singles aren't far behind in terms of power output, and being lighter their power to weight ratio's probably better.

I passed my test in the days before power limitations on new riders and made my own decision to graduate through the ranks of progressively bigger bikes, albeit less than a year between 125cc and 900cc. The rider controls the throttle, not the government and it irks me that personal responsibility is watered down in so many aspects of life.



Originally Posted by Piff Poff (Post 8210235)
At the end of the day you would not put a 14 year old that's just got her learners licence in a Zonda for her first lesson.

What's a 14yr old got to do with this? They can't hold a licence anyway. There are 19 year olds that race in F1 - it's down to appropriate training and competence, not a blanket ban on freedom of choice.

Piff Poff May 21st 2010 4:29 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581177)



What's a 14yr old got to do with this? They can't hold a licence anyway. There are 19 year olds that race in F1 - it's down to appropriate training and competence, not a blanket ban on freedom of choice.

A 14 year old can hold a learners licence, so theoretically you can put a 14 year old in a Zonda, you'd just have to be bloody stupid to sit next to one. We are also talking public roads not race tracks.

Piff Poff May 21st 2010 4:31 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Hermione (Post 8580387)
Oh wow, didn't realise you needed to redo a test in Canada. Just thought you'd be able to do a transfer as for driving licence! How comparable is the test to the UK test? I passed mine here in 2003

Thx

H

It seems to me as thought it's an easier test than in the UK. My OH took lessons last year (never having ridden a bike), he passed his test within the week and is now able to go buy the biggest bike he wants.

R I C H May 21st 2010 4:36 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Piff Poff (Post 8581270)
A 14 year old can hold a learners licence, so theoretically you can put a 14 year old in a Zonda, you'd just have to be bloody stupid to sit next to one. We are also talking public roads not race tracks.

Are you suggesting driving an F1 car competitively on a track doesn't require the same level of skill or ability as driving on public roads? My point is that individuals can learn to handle powerful machines at a young age, and the UK govt. shouldn't effectively legislate to prevent it.

Almost Canadian May 21st 2010 4:43 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581282)
Are you suggesting driving an F1 car competitively on a track doesn't require the same level of skill or ability as driving on public roads? My point is that individuals can learn to handle powerful machines at a young age, and the UK govt. shouldn't effectively legislate to prevent it.

How many F1 drivers smashed their race cars before being able to "safely" drive an F1 car? Would you like them to learn how to do so on public streets. (Wasn`t it Stirling Moss that, famously, never held a drivers` licence while he was racing?)

I understand your argument, but it is based on the presumption that individuals will act rationally. Unfortunately, a large number of them don`t. If they only injured/damaged themselves, I would agree with you, unfortunately, the potential for collateral damage is too high.

Piff Poff May 21st 2010 4:47 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581282)
Are you suggesting driving an F1 car competitively on a track doesn't require the same level of skill or ability as driving on public roads? My point is that individuals can learn to handle powerful machines at a young age, and the UK govt. shouldn't effectively legislate to prevent it.

No! You know that's not what I'm suggesting, I am sure it needs a completely different skill set actually. I am also not disputing that young people can't learn to handle powerful machines respectfully.

The thing is young people (partucularly boys) are often stupid and often want to show off to their mates, look how fast I can go, look at me go through the workers cones, look at me wheely down the motorway, look at me crash and die.

We have all seen idiotic bike riders put their own and other peoples lives at risk. The same as we see hot hatch 'boy racer' types exerting dangerous driving.

R I C H May 21st 2010 4:55 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Piff Poff (Post 8581307)
We have all seen idiotic bike riders put their own and other peoples lives at risk. The same as we see hot hatch 'boy racer' types exerting dangerous driving.

So I go back to my original post - why legislate against recently licenced bikers and not motorists?

Almost Canadian May 21st 2010 4:58 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581317)
So I go back to my original post - why legislate against recently licenced bikers and not motorists?

Very good question. Does Great Britain reciprocate with any of the Provinces? That may be the explanation.:confused:

Piff Poff May 21st 2010 5:04 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581317)
So I go back to my original post - why legislate against recently licenced bikers and not motorists?

Do you mean in general or just those transferring licences from the UK? I would be quite happy to see legislation come into effect limiting the power of one's first vehicle, wether it be a car or a bike. I have a 15 year old that can learn to drive and hold her own licence from next year (providing she passes her test), If she was only limited to selected vehicles (other than insurance prices) I would be very pleased.

For those transferring from a foreign licence, I think there should be a test, but previous licence history taken into account.

R I C H May 21st 2010 5:05 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8581299)
How many F1 drivers smashed their race cars before being able to "safely" drive an F1 car? Would you like them to learn how to do so on public streets. (Wasn`t it Stirling Moss that, famously, never held a drivers` licence while he was racing?)

I understand your argument, but it is based on the presumption that individuals will act rationally. Unfortunately, a large number of them don`t. If they only injured/damaged themselves, I would agree with you, unfortunately, the potential for collateral damage is too high.

Comparing race crashes to on road safety seems somewhat irrelevant, as public roads aren't (IOM and other locations excepted) designed for competitive driving, which inevitably increases crash risk.

There's a car involved in over 60% of KSI (killed/seriously injured) motorcycle accidents, and only 4% of bike accidents are attributed to excessive speed (DfT figures). Careless/reckless riding account for 10% of KSI's. Perhaps the need for improved car driver training, or restrictive licencing is just as important, so they act with better judgement?

elizabeth_action May 21st 2010 5:06 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by R I C H (Post 8581282)
Are you suggesting driving an F1 car competitively on a track doesn't require the same level of skill or ability as driving on public roads? My point is that individuals can learn to handle powerful machines at a young age, and the UK govt. shouldn't effectively legislate to prevent it.

'Can' but all too often and with tragic consequences 'don't'. I am a motorcycling mother of three boys and I can tell you I would appreciate graduating HP here, as in the UK. Try arguing your point with the hundreds of parents who lost sons because they were riding bikes too big to handle. Why should the learners mind? People don't understand the awesome power of some of these bigger bikes; a small flick of the wrist and you've flipped the bike.

By being limited, you'll end up the better rider for it.

R I C H May 21st 2010 5:08 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8581321)
Very good question. Does Great Britain reciprocate with any of the Provinces? That may be the explanation.:confused:

SK offer a bike licence swap for Brits, but I don't mean with regard to the reciprocation issue (though that's a odd anomaly), I mean the practice of restricting bhp to newbies in the UK.

Piff Poff May 21st 2010 5:11 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by elizabeth_action (Post 8581335)
'Can' but all too often and with tragic consequences 'don't'. I am a motorcycling mother of three boys and I can tell you I would appreciate graduating HP here, as in the UK. Try arguing your point with the hundreds of parents who lost sons because they were riding bikes too big to handle. Why should the learners mind? People don't understand the awesome power of some of these bigger bikes; a small flick of the wrist and you've flipped the bike.

By being limited, you'll end up the better rider for it.

It must be a females perspective?:thumbsup:

R I C H May 21st 2010 5:13 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by elizabeth_action (Post 8581335)
By being limited, you'll end up the better rider for it.

Really? Can you prove that?

Would I be a better rider if I'd taken my test 15 years later?

Anyone that's taught that 'a small flick of the wrist' is a safe way to ride/accelerate a larger capacity bike needs better instruction, not a restrictor in the engine to counter lack of training.

People absolutely do understand the power of bikes, I'd suggest that's half their appeal. What government doesn't seem to want to do is offer appropriate training for new riders to handle it.

R I C H May 21st 2010 5:15 am

Re: Motorcycle licence Alberta
 

Originally Posted by Piff Poff (Post 8581343)
It must be a females perspective?:thumbsup:

Female wrists are inherently too weak to wind a throttle on quickly, so they end up frustrated and having to justify their shortcomings on teh interweb ;)


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:46 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.