![]() |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6799952)
I lived in a brick cavity wall house in Toronto. It was standing when the area was surveryed in 1926 and is still there now. I'm sitting in a turn of the century (the other one) brick house looking across the street at a 4 storey brick building from, I guess, the 50s. I suspect that brick is viable but wood is cheaper. I have a penis.
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6799952)
I have a penis.
|
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6800004)
I envy that you do.
|
Re: Houses
Brick "spalls" in the freeze thaw climate that we have here. Hell, even concrete suffers from the winter.
You can get away with brick if you are lucky and do a lot of maintainence, but ultimately brick is expensive...they are not made locally, and its sucks are keeping in heat, and so is relatively uncommon as a result. I would stick with timber frame. A lot of the high street of my local village is brick or stone construction, but its constantly decaying and having to be repaired. Naturally mother canada has a web site... http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/bes/hmpe/m...ezethaw_e.html |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6799907)
I was thinking of the English method of building, as in two walls of brickwork one behind the other with a cavity in between. There must be some of the older structures still standing from the 1800's. Which would put a big question mark on the theory on wood being the only material able to withstand a cold climate. I must sound a bit dense but that's the fault of my gender.
Virtually zero, actually it is R0.2 per inch. To maintain a warm interior a home should have at least R20 in the wall cavities. Brick construction just cannot do that along with the freeze thaw thing others have mentioned it makes brick totally useless as a primary building material in most areas of Canada hence wood frame construction. Don't you think that if brick had worked Brit immigrants from the early twentieth century would have convinced everyone it was the way to build. :p |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6800191)
Have you any idea what the insulation value of brick is?
Virtually zero, actually it is R0.2 per inch. To maintain a warm interior a home should have at least R20 in the wall cavities. Brick construction just cannot do that along with the freeze thaw thing others have mentioned it makes brick totally useless as a primary building material in most areas of Canada hence wood frame construction. Don't you think that if brick had worked Brit immigrants from the early twentieth century would have convinced everyone it was the way to build. :p
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6800191)
Brick construction just cannot do that along with the freeze thaw thing others have mentioned it makes brick totally useless as a primary building material in most areas of Canada hence wood frame construction.
Don't you think that if brick had worked Brit immigrants from the early twentieth century would have convinced everyone it was the way to build. :p They sure ain't wood. |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6798610)
Perhaps, but it still sounds surreal to me.
Anyway, this thread is supposed to be about brick houses in Ontario. Plus, she is only a princess, so what does she know. Bows and walks away |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6800292)
How do you explain the Parliament buildings in Ottawa then?
They sure ain't wood. Brick is not practical in most areas of Canada. If you want to build a brick house and freeze your ass off go for it. |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6800292)
How do you explain the Parliament buildings in Ottawa then?
They sure ain't wood. And its mostly concrete faced with sandstone And it looked like this for 2 years in the 90s while they spent millions to rebuilt it after all the winter damage it had sustained... http://www.parliamenthill.gc.ca/yout.../fem10_max.jpg In fact the houses of parliament are probably a perfect illustration of exactly why masonary is a bad idea in Canada. http://www.parliamenthill.gc.ca/text...reblock_e.html |
Re: Houses
Peterborough has many many century houses. There was a fire some time back and the result was a bylaw prohibiting wooden buildings in the city.
They are still standing and look good. I dont know if the inside is a wooden frame and the outer part brick as the fire retardent?? Our house inspector said that the old houses have dodgy foundations, some country ones have none. A friend has a log house with no foundations. I dont have penis but I have access to one. Does that help? |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6800364)
Oh FFS give it up the topic has been gone over before.
Brick is not practical in most areas of Canada. If you want to build a brick house and freeze your ass off go for it. |
Re: Houses
Houses tend to be built of the materials that are locally available, at least that has been the case in the past. That explains why some parts of the UK have houses made of granite, others sandstone, others clay brick etc.
|
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6800397)
The occupants dont have to pay for the heating or maintainence out of their own pocket;)
And its mostly concrete faced with sandstone And it looked like this for 2 years in the 90s while they spent millions to rebuilt it after all the winter damage it had sustainted... http://www.parliamenthill.gc.ca/yout.../fem10_max.jpg In fact the houses of parliament are probably a perfect illustration of exactly why masonary is a bad idea in Canada. http://www.parliamenthill.gc.ca/text...reblock_e.html |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 6800398)
Peterborough has many many century houses. There was a fire some time back and the result was a bylaw prohibiting wooden buildings in the city.
They are still standing and look good. I dont know if the inside is a wooden frame and the outer part brick as the fire retardent?? Our house inspector said that the old houses have dodgy foundations, some country ones have none. A friend has a log house with no foundations. I dont have penis but I have access to one. Does that help?
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 6800398)
I dont have penis but I have access to one. Does that help? I do to. |
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by queen anne
(Post 6800452)
I do to.
|
Re: Houses
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6800493)
I suspect you meant "I do too" but I rather wish you meant "I do two".
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:24 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.