![]() |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8836812)
.... If a house makes it to mls, and I think there's a case that the better ones never do, ....
Different in Hamilton, I imagine. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8843671)
All MLS listings appear on the MLS
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8843660)
The situation being discussed is where 'multiple offers' are encouraged or just come about. As such, you put your best offer in and include as many conditions as you like (as ever). It's up to you, the buyer.
If you have a buyer's agent from the same brokerage as the seller then you're at an advantage over offerers who do not have such an agent, or have one from another brokerage, because it's in the interest of the seller's agent to make your offer the successful one. Accordingly, the can make your offer the last one and can tell you before you make it what the best previous offer is (and the same through any subsequent rounds of negotiation) this allows you to make a decision without the pressure of uncertainty the other bidders are dealing with. Your agent can also have a frank discussion with the listing agent about the conditions under which the sale came about, including such things as the quality of the inspection report. |
Re: Hamilton???
I definitely agree that a "dual agent" scenario is not ideal for any of the parties involved except the dual agent. The dual agent's inherent conflict is that it would be impossible for him to represent the best interests of both buyer and seller. One wants to pay as little as possible, whilst the other wants to get paid as much as possible.
It has been my experience that RE transactions in Canada are not centric around the idea of achieving a fair market price, but rather have an "us against them" mind set, vis a vis the buyer vs. the seller. We have also been blessed with some great RE agents that are both fair and extremely knowledgeable. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by alex9160
(Post 8846431)
I definitely agree that a "dual agent" scenario is not ideal for any of the parties involved except the dual agent. The dual agent's inherent conflict is that it would be impossible for him to represent the best interests of both buyer and seller. One wants to pay as little as possible, whilst the other wants to get paid as much as possible.
It has been my experience that RE transactions in Canada are not centric around the idea of achieving a fair market price, but rather have an "us against them" mind set, vis a vis the buyer vs. the seller. We have also been blessed with some great RE agents that are both fair and extremely knowledgeable. That interest is making a deal happen so as to move the property off the books ASAP (and of course collect the commission). |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8846440)
Leaving aside the question of whether "centric" is actually a word; the conceivable advantage of dual agency is that s/he is acting in her/his own interest, rather than either party's.
That interest is making a deal happen so as to move the property off the books ASAP (and of course collect the commission). I don't see that a buyer's agent actually represents the interests of the buyer. It seems to me that the interest of the agent is in getting the purchaser to take something, ideally a house on the books of the brokerage that's difficult to shift, failing that anything on the books of the brokerage and, failing that, something quickly. Any argument that the agent will act to benefit the purchaser in order to establish a relationship assumes that people use the same agent twice, something I think unlikely except in small towns where there's little choice. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8847173)
I think that, in difficult markets, dual agency provides an appropriate reward for the listing agent. In general I don't think the buyer's agent brings very much to a transaction, the potential purchaser likely finds the house, either online at propertyguys.com or on the mls or by driving by. The potential purchaser decides what to bid and effectively gifts the commission to an agent he or she knows and likes. The listing agent, otoh, has advised on what must be fixed, created a video and marketed the property through Facebook, mls, his or her own website and so on. He or she has also arranged and turned up for open houses and showings. I know that, were I a listing agent, it'd piss me off royally to do all the work and then to see half the money go to a bystander.
I don't see that a buyer's agent actually represents the interests of the buyer. It seems to me that the interest of the agent is in getting the purchaser to take something, ideally a house on the books of the brokerage that's difficult to shift, failing that anything on the books of the brokerage and, failing that, something quickly. Any argument that the agent will act to benefit the purchaser in order to establish a relationship assumes that people use the same agent twice, something I think unlikely except in small towns where there's little choice. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8847560)
You demonstrate time and time again that you know sweet f.a. about how the real estate business works in Ontario.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8847578)
Are you a real estate agent?
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8847687)
I was going to suggest rejected former/wannabe lover. Vitriol city. Hell hath no fury and all that.
I was just wondering if BC15 is, in fact, a licensed real estate agent in the province of Ontario. Because if not, then he/she can only provide their own personal experiences and thoughts on real estate transactions. Just the same as anyone else can. Of course, things could all be different in Hamilton. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8831645)
Like Milton Keynes? You'll love Burlington and Milton.
My view of the suburban wasteland surrounding Toronto is well known but, even accepting that there are people who are willing to live in Burlington or Milton, I can't see the point in the OP considering such places. The case for such suburbs is, in short, that tolerating the commute to Toronto allows you to have a house with two bathrooms, albeit one in an unattractive housing project. If one is to work in Hamilton then there's no need to commute to Toronto so one has the option to live somewhere attractive, such as the better parts of Hamilton or in a smaller town, Guelph, Fergus, somewhere like that. If what one wants is a poorly constructed piece of tat sandwiched among many other poorly constructed pieces of tat, then Grimsby offers the "features" of Burlington or Milton but at a lower cost; three bathrooms instead of two. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8847560)
You demonstrate time and time again that you know sweet f.a. about how the real estate business works in Ontario.
I don't think I could be more involved in real estate transactions in Ontario than I currently am without being an agent. In which case, of course, I would claim that the TREB has clear rules that all agents can understand and follow and that those agents personally handle their own listings, diligently measuring rooms and representing properties fairly, partly because they hope to build relationships lasting a lifetime but mainly because they are honourable people who have no other sources of income. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Miss Clinique
(Post 8847727)
Not all of Burlington is as you describe it. Our house is situated right on the escarpment, in fact we are 3 houses away from the bruce trail.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8847780)
Well sure, there's a nice old house in Mississauga, two in Scarborough, but they're not typical of those areas.
Good to hear there are other nice house's in the GTA ;) |
Re: Hamilton???
My wife spent a few years living in Hamilton and some of her family still live there. She has vowed never to live there again.
Apparently a Canadian newspaper reported that scientists had found that mice exposed to pollutants in Hamilton air became mutated after four generations. :ohmy: My experience of downtown Hamiton was that it was quite bleak, many prostitutes on street corners, boarded up buildings etc. My mother in law's house is attached to a house that had a major fire a year ago and is now abandoned She's been mugged twice and there's been many shootings, stabbings and machete attacks in the area. While visiting we stayed in Stoney Creek (on the Hamilton border) and that seemed OK. The escartment is really impressive, took a nice walk up there (mainly to find out why there was a giant illuminated cross on top). But hey the first ever Tiim Hortons is in Hamilton so it's not all bad. |
Re: Hamilton???
Prostitutes, stabbings and muggings? Sounds like great entertainment.
Believe it or not there are some great neighbourhoods in Hamilton. |
Re: Hamilton???
From the Urban Dictionary
"Some areas of Hamilton are nice like Westdale and McMaster University, Hess Street, Dundas and the Dundas Valley, and Ancaster. However, the north end of Hamilton is vile and horrific. The north end is home to two of Canada's largest steel works (Stelco and Dofasco). The revolting brown, crumbling mass of factories, slag heaps, and smog turns the image of Hamilton into a city that is a shithole that isn't fit for human habitation. Hamiltonians also have an inferiority complex next to its larger neighbour, Toronto. However, Hamitonians know that by risking higher rates of cancer, deformed children, and the awful eggy-smell due to the steel works, the rent and quality of life is great." |
Re: Hamilton???
Hamilton looks like a complete shit hole. Why not move to Hull?
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8848961)
Hamilton looks like a complete shit hole. Why not move to Hull?
anyhoo - it does sound awful and I'm glad I don't live there. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8847775)
Or perhaps how you'd like it portrayed. I assume you're in the business but choose not to declare the fact.
...the TREB .... |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8852642)
TREB, actually, not 'the TREB'.
Since this is now the thread for all matters real estate, here's an approach to a deal, new to me, that may help someone else. I received an offer on a property in which it's proposed that the buyer pays the agent's fees, the cost of the house to be reduced by an equivalent amount (ok the seller is still paying really but in a different manner). I like this because for the buyer it reduces the amount subject to Land Transfer Tax and that may make a deal that otherwise wouldn't happen. Every day a new wrinkle. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by BC15
(Post 8852642)
TREB, actually, not 'the TREB'.
"I would claim that the TREB has clear rules" The TREB board's site (http://www.torontorealestateboard.co.../faq/index.htm) has the following: "The Toronto Real Estate Board is restricted to handling concerns relating to the Multiple" "The Toronto Real Estate Board issues news releases twice a month" "TREB is unable to recommend a particular REALTOR" That is, the definite article is dropped when the abbreviation is used. I don't think this is customary in English. One might right, "the RAC decries speed cameras" or "the NHS offers a superior service". I suggest that the usage on the real estate board's site is either an advertising affectation or a simple case of illiteracy on the part of the writer. In either case I see no need to adopt it. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8852669)
An important and pertinent point, I shall note the need to drop the definite article when in Hamilton.
Since this is now the thread for all matters real estate, here's an approach to a deal, new to me, that may help someone else. I received an offer on a property in which it's proposed that the buyer pays the agent's fees, the cost of the house to be reduced by an equivalent amount (ok the seller is still paying really but in a different manner). I like this because for the buyer it reduces the amount subject to Land Transfer Tax and that may make a deal that otherwise wouldn't happen. Every day a new wrinkle. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8852717)
I think I was too quick in conceding that point. My usage, sarcastic, of course, was
"I would claim that the TREB has clear rules" The TREB board's site (http://www.torontorealestateboard.co.../faq/index.htm) has the following: "The Toronto Real Estate Board is restricted to handling concerns relating to the Multiple" "The Toronto Real Estate Board issues news releases twice a month" "TREB is unable to recommend a particular REALTOR" That is, the definite article is dropped when the abbreviation is used. I don't think this is customary in English. One might right, "the RAC decries speed cameras" or "the NHS offers a superior service". I suggest that the usage on the real estate board's site is either an advertising affectation or a simple case of illiteracy on the part of the writer. In either case I see no need to adopt it. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8852729)
You were doing so well until then...........
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8852739)
Gasp! I kill myself.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8852729)
You were doing so well until then...........
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852846)
Shut it.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8852856)
That's not terribly likely, is it?
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852846)
Shut it.
<<clinks carrier bag>> |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852858)
People once thought it terribly unlikely that the world was round.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8852908)
It isn't. It's bigger in the middle than it is pole to pole. Technically, I suppose, the world is obese.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852930)
The world has middle-aged spread? A gym ball would fix that.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8852945)
Why would it bother? The world is going to be around long after we are all done squandering electrons here.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852978)
Can you be sure? It seems pretty knackered what with the sun frying it through the ozone, oil squirting all over it and people ripping out trees willy nilly.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8852981)
Its people living on it that are screwed. Our parasitic infestation will die out and something else will emerge on the rock a few million years from now. The Earth will be just fine. Future human generations Im not so optimisitic about.
|
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852987)
You're probably right, we will never know. Hamilton, however, Hamilton will survive through everything.
Like cockroaches I expect;) |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8852989)
Oh probably. And Realtors.
Like cockroaches I expect;) I'm not hating realtors at the moment, there are some good ones out there. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8852997)
:ohmy:
I'm not hating realtors at the moment, there are some good ones out there. No, you are right, there are some good ones, they are just easy to pick on. |
Re: Hamilton???
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8853008)
Name three:sneaky::D
No, you are right, there are some good ones, they are just easy to pick on. I'll give you that some are hard working and good company. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:00 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.