Fishy question...
#31
Re: Fishy question...
Oh, do stop going on with this tedious and pretentious rant. I suppose your local store shows prices not only in pounds, but in shillings and pence too?
What's more, in your IT thingy life, would you like to program in a system which had random multipliers between increasing categories?
OK, with that hint, here's a puzzle for you...
Series:
16 17 18 22 24 31 100 ? ?
fill in the next two numbers.
If you can do that I'll renounce metric.
What's more, in your IT thingy life, would you like to program in a system which had random multipliers between increasing categories?
OK, with that hint, here's a puzzle for you...
Series:
16 17 18 22 24 31 100 ? ?
fill in the next two numbers.
If you can do that I'll renounce metric.
#32
Re: Fishy question...
Metric maths is too difficult, fish comes in 290s, butter in 454s, shopkeepers only use metric to confuse customers and, with me, they succeed; I go to a reputable shop instead.
It's astonishingly arrogant of the Canadians to insist on this stupid scheme of labelling everything in odd numbers but I suppose that's part of being half-French.
It's astonishingly arrogant of the Canadians to insist on this stupid scheme of labelling everything in odd numbers but I suppose that's part of being half-French.
290 g = 0.64 lb
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/weight
But I agree with you. The idea is always to confuse customers. Something which is inbred in metrical-worshipers. I for one, charge for my translations not by the word, but by 0.732 word... My two ounces of good sense.
#34
Re: Fishy question...
454 g = 1 lb
290 g = 0.64 lb
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/weight
But I agree with you. The idea is always to confuse customers. Something which is inbred in metrical-worshipers. I for one, charge for my translations not by the word, but by 0.732 word... My two ounces of good sense.
290 g = 0.64 lb
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/weight
But I agree with you. The idea is always to confuse customers. Something which is inbred in metrical-worshipers. I for one, charge for my translations not by the word, but by 0.732 word... My two ounces of good sense.
Uh?!!!!!
#35
Re: Fishy question...
Actually, we do have some imports that do not come in round gram figures. It's always very weird to see them as over 90% of the produce you find in the grocery stores are usally in round figures: 100g, 200g, 250g, 500g, 1kg, etc.
Chocolate bars use to come in 200g. Bloody manufacturers changed that to 190g and even 180g bars! Obviously, prices remained the same. :curse:
Same applies to beverages, but that's another story...
#36
Re: Fishy question...
Hope that helps!
(I should add that this is my hubbies response, not mine, after several glasses of wine )
#37
Re: Fishy question...
A man ran out of the house, he jumped over a five bar gate, passed three horse chestnut trees, was chased by a black bull as three spotted cows looked on, and two sheep ate freshly mown grass; what colour were his socks?
Hope that helps!
(I should add that this is my hubbies response, not mine, after several glasses of wine )
Hope that helps!
(I should add that this is my hubbies response, not mine, after several glasses of wine )
#42
Re: Fishy question...
No, they use dollars here. The local store, (Loblaws at Vic Park and Gerrard) has genetically mutilated turbot for $7.99 a pound this week. I make that about $60.60 for 290grams though I don't know that 290grams is the metric unit of fish used in Toronto.
#43
Re: Fishy question...
They could deal with metric in the same way, the programmer chooses some standard unit, say the pound, and converts all the metric measures to it. It keeps a unit of measure for display which can be as odd as you like (290grams, 454grams, whatever) and translates the internal measure at the time of display. The key is that everything internal to the machine is best kept in one unit and the metric units are only used when dealing with people.
Since the internal tracking is seperate from the "presentation layer" the display can be quite sophisticated, for example, if Loblaws is selling fish for $9.99/lb the computer at a metric competitior can automatically adjust the size of the metric unit used for the sale of fish so as to price the fish at $9.50; the consumer is not likely to notice that the grams offered only equal 3/4 of a pound. I assume this is how they came up with 290grams and that, week by week, they juggle the number of grams. You can't do this with proper measures, of course, a consumer is not going to stand for being offered fish in units of "a bit less than five eigths of a pound" or any such nonsense, they only put up with it in metric because the standard units are so awkward; once you accept that 454 is a sensible base unit (as in metric butter) you accept anything.
#44
Re: Fishy question...
You mean like milliseconds, seconds, minutes, hours, days and years? Computers can deal with that.
They could deal with metric in the same way, the programmer chooses some standard unit, say the pound, and converts all the metric measures to it. It keeps a unit of measure for display which can be as odd as you like (290grams, 454grams, whatever) and translates the internal measure at the time of display. The key is that everything internal to the machine is best kept in one unit and the metric units are only used when dealing with people.
Since the internal tracking is seperate from the "presentation layer" the display can be quite sophisticated, for example, if Loblaws is selling fish for $9.99/lb the computer at a metric competitior can automatically adjust the size of the metric unit used for the sale of fish so as to price the fish at $9.50; the consumer is not likely to notice that the grams offered only equal 3/4 of a pound. I assume this is how they came up with 290grams and that, week by week, they juggle the number of grams. You can't do this with proper measures, of course, a consumer is not going to stand for being offered fish in units of "a bit less than five eigths of a pound" or any such nonsense, they only put up with it in metric because the standard units are so awkward; once you accept that 454 is a sensible base unit (as in metric butter) you accept anything.
They could deal with metric in the same way, the programmer chooses some standard unit, say the pound, and converts all the metric measures to it. It keeps a unit of measure for display which can be as odd as you like (290grams, 454grams, whatever) and translates the internal measure at the time of display. The key is that everything internal to the machine is best kept in one unit and the metric units are only used when dealing with people.
Since the internal tracking is seperate from the "presentation layer" the display can be quite sophisticated, for example, if Loblaws is selling fish for $9.99/lb the computer at a metric competitior can automatically adjust the size of the metric unit used for the sale of fish so as to price the fish at $9.50; the consumer is not likely to notice that the grams offered only equal 3/4 of a pound. I assume this is how they came up with 290grams and that, week by week, they juggle the number of grams. You can't do this with proper measures, of course, a consumer is not going to stand for being offered fish in units of "a bit less than five eigths of a pound" or any such nonsense, they only put up with it in metric because the standard units are so awkward; once you accept that 454 is a sensible base unit (as in metric butter) you accept anything.
To paraphrase something my old granny used to say, "dbd my lad, if you push your tongue any further into your cheek like that, it'll get stuck there"
Pax vobiscum.
Novo.
#45
Re: Fishy question...
Give it a go, but if you can't solve it just ask...I'm sure you couild use the single malt.