Canada signs FATCA treaty
#76
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
Right - while placing the financial cost of finding/reporting/collecting it on foreign governments and financial institutions. It's a win-win for the US.
#77
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
If one has the degree of paranoia required to think that Americans will turn up on the doorstep and claim one in the manner of a press gang then surely one should also think that making oneself known to the Americans will result in immediate hauling away to Gitmo and a life of slave labour in lieu of past taxes.
#78
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
In a word, no. Nothing is always a clever thing to say and often a clever thing to do.
If one has the degree of paranoia required to think that Americans will turn up on the doorstep and claim one in the manner of a press gang then surely one should also think that making oneself known to the Americans will result in immediate hauling away to Gitmo and a life of slave labour in lieu of past taxes.
If one has the degree of paranoia required to think that Americans will turn up on the doorstep and claim one in the manner of a press gang then surely one should also think that making oneself known to the Americans will result in immediate hauling away to Gitmo and a life of slave labour in lieu of past taxes.
#79
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
I'm all in favour of preparing for a future that may be different from the present, but really ... who's actually going to ask? The United States is not likely to start assuming that those with U.S. parents are citizens, and entitled to all the benefits of United States citizenship when a substantial number of those with American parents aren't even U.S. citizens to begin with.
#80
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
It's far from far-fetched.
Unambiguous indication of a U.S. place of birth;
Last edited by Steve_; Feb 28th 2014 at 3:14 pm.
#81
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
The bank is going to ask, that's what this thread is about. Read the treaty. When you open a bank account in Canada they ask what citizenship you are. The treaty says financial institutions look for indicia. One of those indices is a US birthplace. "What citizenship are you?" "I'm Canadian, here is my passport to prove it." "Oh it says here you were born in the US, are you a US citizen?"
It's far from far-fetched.
Sooner or later that is going to happen.
It's far from far-fetched.
Sooner or later that is going to happen.
If the teller were to be aware that the US government wanted him or her to start poking into the status of new customers in Canada, do you think he or she would be likely to do so? I say not. Assuming the teller to be Canadian, he or she is defined by being proudly not-American. He or she certainly has no incentive to bother a customer by disputing the customer's nationality.
Maybe, if you're a fugitive billionaire fraudster who's face has been splashed across the papers in front of a Stars and Stripes a bank teller in Canada would take an interest in you, but most bank customers are not.
#82
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
I think it improbable that a Canadian, born in the US, would use a passport to establish identity at the bank. For a start, I don't imagine many non-immigrant Canadians have passports. He or she would likely use a driving license and, if asked nationality, would say, simply, Canadian. I doubt the bank teller would ask further.
If the teller were to be aware that the US government wanted him or her to start poking into the status of new customers in Canada, do you think he or she would be likely to do so? I say not. Assuming the teller to be Canadian, he or she is defined by being proudly not-American. He or she certainly has no incentive to bother a customer by disputing the customer's nationality.
In the treaty there is an exemption for accounts under $50,000 but that's not exactly an enormous limit.
I would be very surprised if zero US-born Canadians who aren't billionaires aren't caught out by this new treaty. Otherwise there would be no point to the requirement, would there?
#83
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
I think it improbable that a Canadian, born in the US, would use a passport to establish identity at the bank. For a start, I don't imagine many non-immigrant Canadians have passports. He or she would likely use a driving license and, if asked nationality, would say, simply, Canadian. I doubt the bank teller would ask further.
If the teller were to be aware that the US government wanted him or her to start poking into the status of new customers in Canada, do you think he or she would be likely to do so? I say not. Assuming the teller to be Canadian, he or she is defined by being proudly not-American. He or she certainly has no incentive to bother a customer by disputing the customer's nationality.
Maybe, if you're a fugitive billionaire fraudster who's face has been splashed across the papers in front of a Stars and Stripes a bank teller in Canada would take an interest in you, but most bank customers are not.
If the teller were to be aware that the US government wanted him or her to start poking into the status of new customers in Canada, do you think he or she would be likely to do so? I say not. Assuming the teller to be Canadian, he or she is defined by being proudly not-American. He or she certainly has no incentive to bother a customer by disputing the customer's nationality.
Maybe, if you're a fugitive billionaire fraudster who's face has been splashed across the papers in front of a Stars and Stripes a bank teller in Canada would take an interest in you, but most bank customers are not.
#84
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
Do you think the banks are going to start investigating existing customers? Should I expect a knock on the door, "Mr. dbd, we see you've often driven around with CO plates, are you now or have you ever been an American?". I'll accept that banks employ a lot of lovers of administrivia but this is all rather silly, even bankers have better things to do.
#85
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
- the US suspects a few rich citizens to be living in Canada and avoiding taxes, the US government would like that tax money
- the US wants to send a message that nowhere, not even Moose Jaw, is beyond the reach of the IRS
- the US is always interested in hegemony
- Canada is always interested in seeming to be compliant with US wishes.
Joe Public need not be much troubled by any of it.
#86
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
I do think that. It may be that someone opening a US dollar account in a border town such as Niagara Falls while wearing a stetson and bar boots would attract attention as a potential American but, even if the clerk knew of this regulation, I think it questionable that it would be actioned. Someone dressed in plaid who walks into a bank in Guelph and says "I need an account, eh?" is not going to be probed.
Do you think the banks are going to start investigating existing customers? Should I expect a knock on the door, "Mr. dbd, we see you've often driven around with CO plates, are you now or have you ever been an American?". I'll accept that banks employ a lot of lovers of administrivia but this is all rather silly, even bankers have better things to do.
Do you think the banks are going to start investigating existing customers? Should I expect a knock on the door, "Mr. dbd, we see you've often driven around with CO plates, are you now or have you ever been an American?". I'll accept that banks employ a lot of lovers of administrivia but this is all rather silly, even bankers have better things to do.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fatca-...-law-1.2493882
"Under the law, banks from around the world will be asked to sift through their accounts to look for clients with U.S. connections, then share that information with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
Who is affected by this law?
The short answer is almost every Canadian. It is expected to cost banks substantial amounts of money to implement the systems required to find residents with U.S. connections, costs the banks may well pass along to all their clients. Some estimate it could cost $100 million for each financial institution. Those directly affected by the law include dual citizens, Canadians with Green Cards and some snowbirds who spend considerable time in the U.S."
#87
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
It's an SQL query, they already asked in the past. Five seconds, export into a CSV file, e-mail to IRS. Every bank I've dealt with in Canada asks your citizenship and has a field in their account information for it.
There's no doubt people are going to get caught out by this, the only real question is how many.
What we were talking about is people who haven't claimed to be US citizens for awhile, that's a less black and white issue because the bank won't necessarily have that in their database because the customer has never claimed it. But the bank could find out, place of birth listed in a passport would be one way.
#88
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
You work in IT, yeah? And so does Ned.
It's an SQL query, they already asked in the past. Five seconds, export into a CSV file, e-mail to IRS. Every bank I've dealt with in Canada asks your citizenship and has a field in their account information for it.
There's no doubt people are going to get caught out by this, the only real question is how many.
What we were talking about is people who haven't claimed to be US citizens for awhile, that's a less black and white issue because the bank won't necessarily have that in their database because the customer has never claimed it. But the bank could find out, place of birth listed in a passport would be one way.
It's an SQL query, they already asked in the past. Five seconds, export into a CSV file, e-mail to IRS. Every bank I've dealt with in Canada asks your citizenship and has a field in their account information for it.
There's no doubt people are going to get caught out by this, the only real question is how many.
What we were talking about is people who haven't claimed to be US citizens for awhile, that's a less black and white issue because the bank won't necessarily have that in their database because the customer has never claimed it. But the bank could find out, place of birth listed in a passport would be one way.
I don't think anyone is disputing that in general, Canadians with a U.S. birthplace (or who have been registered as U.S. citizens, or otherwise claimed U.S. citizenship) should resolve whether they are or are not U.S. citizens. However, it appears to be an over-complication to suggest it should be high priority for an elderly Canadian citizen who has not used U.S. citizenship for 50 years.
And it is far fetched to suggest that those who have a U.S. born parent will be even identified as such, let alone assumed to be U.S. citizens, when United States law requires a preponderance of evidence in support of such assertion to be shown.
Last edited by JAJ; Mar 1st 2014 at 2:33 am.
#89
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
Except that place of birth is not normally asked for to open a bank account, nor is a passport, necessarily. So it would involve a lot of manual searching, which they may do, but only for million dollar balances. And they won't be sending anything to the IRS, at most it will go to the CRA who may share it with the IRS.
I don't think anyone is disputing that in general, Canadians with a U.S. birthplace (or who have been registered as U.S. citizens, or otherwise claimed U.S. citizenship) should resolve whether they are or are not U.S. citizens. However, it appears to be an over-complication to suggest it should be high priority for an elderly Canadian citizen who has not used U.S. citizenship for 50 years.
And it is far fetched to suggest that those who have a U.S. born parent will be even identified as such, let alone assumed to be U.S. citizens, when United States law requires a preponderance of evidence in support of such assertion to be shown.
I don't think anyone is disputing that in general, Canadians with a U.S. birthplace (or who have been registered as U.S. citizens, or otherwise claimed U.S. citizenship) should resolve whether they are or are not U.S. citizens. However, it appears to be an over-complication to suggest it should be high priority for an elderly Canadian citizen who has not used U.S. citizenship for 50 years.
And it is far fetched to suggest that those who have a U.S. born parent will be even identified as such, let alone assumed to be U.S. citizens, when United States law requires a preponderance of evidence in support of such assertion to be shown.
Last edited by MarylandNed; Mar 1st 2014 at 4:26 am.
#90
Re: Canada signs FATCA treaty
Why do you keep going on about what normally happens? What has historical norms got to do with this? This is a NEW law that Canadian financial institutions are going to have to comply with from July 1st 2014 if they don't want to suffer the consequences. So what if place of birth or citizenship info has or has not normally been asked for? FATCA means that there will be a good reason to ask for any information that could point to possible US financial ties and tax liability. Policy changes are obviously needed to comply with FATCA so talk about current policies is meaningless.
The reaction in Canada, or at least among a section of Canadian opinion, is way out of proportion to what the Agreement involves.