![]() |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11161255)
Ongoing prescription and some other ongoing medical issues, the walk in wont deal with those type of things on an ongoing basis.
|
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11161180)
It's a bit off topic but why do you feel that you need a GP? Why is a walk-in clinic not adequate?
(I've no axe to grind here but I haven't had a GP since I was a small child, my children have never had a GP, we don't feel unserved.) I've been on a waiting list for 2 years to have an initial consultation with an orthopedic surgeon, which to my mind is unacceptable. Neighbouring health authorities have waiting lists of 3-6 months, but I can't access them as I don't live in their catchment. Those sort of discrepancies are common. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11161180)
It's a bit off topic but why do you feel that you need a GP? Why is a walk-in clinic not adequate?
(I've no axe to grind here but I haven't had a GP since I was a small child, my children have never had a GP, we don't feel unserved.) |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11161268)
Ah. If it's people with chronic conditions who need a GP then maybe it would be most efficient to have the walk-in deal with the newly sick and refer people to GPs only after a few visits. That way GPs wouldn't have to have much in the way of diagnostic skills and cheaper substitutes, such as nurse practitioners, could take on more of their role.
Upside for was co-payment too, NP was co-pay free where the GP was a 25 co-pay.. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Tirytory
(Post 11161306)
I think the problem is you won't be getting the best care. The husband says he has pts who are registering with him who just do the rounds of walk in clinics who are on all sorts of drugs they don't need to be on, that don't work together etc etc. he says the patients records are way behind that of the uk so you only have the pts word for medical history, medication etc etc which can obviously lead to all sorts of problems. He also says benzodiazepam addiction is very high here, again from people able to pick it up from various walk in clinics. He says it's much higher than the UK. Who has duty of care to you if you only see a doctor once? For the likes of me someone healthy- physically or mentally fine, for those on the border it's not good.
Most walk in's I have been to in BC, wont prescribe the most commonly abused drugs, as well as most mental health meds. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11161268)
Ah. If it's people with chronic conditions who need a GP then maybe it would be most efficient to have the walk-in deal with the newly sick and refer people to GPs only after a few visits. That way GPs wouldn't have to have much in the way of diagnostic skills and cheaper substitutes, such as nurse practitioners, could take on more of their role.
See in the UK, it's the other way round, nurse pracs are dealing with more treatment of chronic conditions within acute and GP settings. They can work in a specialised area within defined parameters of a role. Think about it this way, you have a sudden onset of systems which possibly point to an urgent suspected cancer, do you want to take that to your own doctor who is fully aware of your medical history, any family history, previous symptoms and treatment, or do you want to take it someone new who you don't know, and hope that they treat you appropriately? |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11161318)
Most walk in's I have been to in BC, wont prescribe the most commonly abused drugs, as well as most mental health meds.
|
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by akshabhi
(Post 11161023)
Thank you sooo much for all your replies.
Thank you Tirytory for your kind detailed reply. There was lot of useful information. Oink!! you are absolutely spot on with whats going on in my mind. Only thing I would add is small houses for the prices. I always liked to have huge ones. Sorry but few more questions- 1.I was just wondering if you have any clues on Australian pay for GPs and Paeds? 2.i think average pay a full time GP gets in UK is 100-120k for 8-9 sessions + pension. How would be range in Ontario? I understand pension not paid as in nhs. Is it still higher considering this? 3. Is workload equivalent or higher than UK GPs considering I will do only GP surgery with no other special interest. 4.What are the preferred places in Ontario to live or work?? akshabhi I think your average for a UK GP is pretty high. Where my husband worked, he was 9 sessions plus a lot of ooh work and still wasn't as high that and getting less by the month with the various government changes. So yes, the wages are higher. Workload is defined by yourself, however much you want to earn, although keep in mind there are still requirements to ooh. Husband does every Wednesday after clinic hrs and a weekend a month.. Ontario is about 3 times bigger than the UK, but there is also Alberta, BC, plus other provinces to think about it. You have to consider what you want out of a new life. Country? City? Lots of snow? Not much? How much cold can you out up with? If you contact Health Force Ontario, they will be able to help you run through what you need to do to get licensing, salaries and jobs etc. Only for Ontario obviously, you might find Alberta is prepared to help you substantially to go work out there. But you need to do the basics first, figure out what you want and where you want to be- if it helps, we narrowed down to flight time, weather, the information on the different provinces and then the different licensing requirements within provinces. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Tirytory
(Post 11161306)
I think the problem is you won't be getting the best care. The husband says he has pts who are registering with him who just do the rounds of walk in clinics who are on all sorts of drugs they don't need to be on, that don't work together etc etc. he says the patients records are way behind that of the uk so you only have the pts word for medical history, medication etc etc which can obviously lead to all sorts of problems. He also says benzodiazepam addiction is very high here, again from people able to pick it up from various walk in clinics. He says it's much higher than the UK. Who has duty of care to you if you only see a doctor once? For the likes of me someone healthy- physically or mentally fine, for those on the border it's not good.
My own GP is on vacation so often i rarely see the same doctor twice, i coukd see a nurse practitioner but i am not impressed by the ones at my health clinic. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Tirytory
(Post 11161332)
Think about it this way, you have a sudden onset of systems which possibly point to an urgent suspected cancer, do you want to take that to your own doctor who is fully aware of your medical history, any family history, previous symptoms and treatment, or do you want to take it someone new who you don't know, and hope that they treat you appropriately
Originally Posted by Tirytory
(Post 11161340)
What do those without a doctor do? Fall by the wayside? As far as this area goes, it's a very common addiction at least compared to UK addictions!!!
If one needs these and has no doctor at all, they can go to the ER and try their luck, or just do without. ER doctors have more access to medical history and history of medication, where a walk in won't. I was surprised how the doctor in the ER was able to pull up all my medication history having never been to that ER before. If you have a severe mental illness, you can usually get a social worker and psychiatrist at mental health unit for your region, if your mild to moderate mental illness, then its a lot harder to get either. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11161365)
Sometimes I wonder if doctors even remember their patients... With electronic records, I wish the practice which has 8 or 9 doctors in it, would just let patients see any of them, they all have access to the records in the practice, but they still make you just see the doctor you have, just a pain when you have a semi-retired doctor with limited working hours at his practice.
If its not a mental health drug, or pain killer, walk in's will usually do a refill but the one's I am familiar with wont re-fill pain killers and mental health drugs because of the potential for abuse and addiction. If one needs these and has no doctor at all, they can go to the ER and try their luck, or just do without. ER doctors have more access to medical history and history of medication, where a walk in won't. I was surprised how the doctor in the ER was able to pull up all my medication history having never been to that ER before. If you have a severe mental illness, you can usually get a social worker and psychiatrist at mental health unit for your region, if your mild to moderate mental illness, then its a lot harder to get either. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11161365)
Sometimes I wonder if doctors even remember their patients...
Last visit, I was offered drugs I'd already suffered adverse reaction to, a cortisone injection and X-ray diagnosis, which I'd already had. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by R I C H
(Post 11161281)
The problem I've found with walk in clinics is doctor availability.
|
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by Tirytory
(Post 11161332)
Think about it this way, you have a sudden onset of systems which possibly point to an urgent suspected cancer, do you want to take that to your own doctor who is fully aware of your medical history, any family history, previous symptoms and treatment, or do you want to take it someone new who you don't know, and hope that they treat you appropriately?
That's an information sharing problem not one altered by the doctor knowing or not knowing the patient. |
Re: Australia or canada for doctors
Originally Posted by R I C H
(Post 11161403)
My experience is they don't. Nor do they read notes prior to seeing you.
Last visit, I was offered drugs I'd already suffered adverse reaction to, a cortisone injection and X-ray diagnosis, which I'd already had. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:09 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.