Should unhealthy food be required to be labeled with graphic health warnings?
#1

just like fag?
it would
perhaps make you lose appetite if you see a photo of a diseased heart or liver or amputated leg.
it would
perhaps make you lose appetite if you see a photo of a diseased heart or liver or amputated leg.

#3
Fronting the Parole Board










Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...
Posts: 93,462












Just like the nasty pictures on cigarette packets made everyone stop smoking? Yeah right .........

#4
Where is my avatar !!










Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Below. Somewhere rather noisy.
Posts: 37,893












Should unhealthy food be required to be labeled with graphic health warnings

#7

Food is just food, what makes it 'unheathly' is context and dosage.
A pizza is fine, a doughnut is fine, a tuna salad is just as fine.
In context.
A pizza is fine, a doughnut is fine, a tuna salad is just as fine.
In context.

#11

As long as it's made with spelt flour.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.
Last edited by ozzieeagle; Apr 18th 2013 at 11:21 pm.

#12
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,375












The majority of people know exactly what food is good or bad for them, they just choose to use that knowledge or not. Many just dont care or wont take responsibility for their health.
When discharged from hosp recently, a very obese lady was at the hospital doors with us, she said she had been in for 3 and a half weeks with a massive ulcer. The first thing she did was lit up a cigarette!!
You would have thought she would have grabbed the chance to have given it up, but nope. More shocking was this woman with chronic health probs from her weight and smoking was 23!!!!
When discharged from hosp recently, a very obese lady was at the hospital doors with us, she said she had been in for 3 and a half weeks with a massive ulcer. The first thing she did was lit up a cigarette!!
You would have thought she would have grabbed the chance to have given it up, but nope. More shocking was this woman with chronic health probs from her weight and smoking was 23!!!!

#13

As long as it's made with spelt flour.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.

The problem is that you can find a study to prove almost anything in the nutritional field.
It's just fuel, what is 'unhealthy'? Anything in excess ... Water ... Avocado ... Goji berries ...

#14

As long as it's made with spelt flour.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.
So what label would Butter get v Margarine ? With one being natural and one being closely associated with plastic.
One of the main problems I see is the nutrition scientists moving the goal posts on food and it's effects all the time.
They are even saying Kangaroo could be bad for the heart now because of L Carnatine.
FFS - I pretty much only eat roo and chicken these days. I think I will stop listening to the experts and just eat what I want, when I fancy.
S

#15

http://www.smh.com.au/national/kanga...408-2hgyx.html
Which leads me to the same view as you. Eat what your comfortable eating. One of the biggest no no's for me is charred meat over open fire.... I can feel that doing bad things when I inadvertently ingest some.
Last edited by ozzieeagle; Apr 19th 2013 at 12:37 am.
