A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Hi
Is standing under the sun in a day with UV index=7 in Australia is as dangerous as standing under the sun in a day with UV=7 in a country without Ozone depletion? Cheers, |
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by BARDI77
(Post 7717370)
Hi
Is standing under the sun in a day with UV index=7 in Australia is as dangerous as standing under the sun in a day with UV=7 in a country without Ozone depletion? Cheers, |
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 7718003)
One of the most intelligent questions in years deserving of an answer! ...... .
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by sonlymewalter
(Post 7718014)
And the answer is?:confused:
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by BARDI77
(Post 7717370)
Hi
Is standing under the sun in a day with UV index=7 in Australia is as dangerous as standing under the sun in a day with UV=7 in a country without Ozone depletion? Cheers, So yes, the Index value takes the local Ozone measurements into account. Ref : http://www.bom.gov.au/info/about_uv.shtml http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/mdev/expt/uvindex/uvi.shtml http://www.temis.nl/uvradiation/UVindex.html |
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
I haven't looked at this for a while but the last I heard was that the southern ozone hole was recovering (i.e. closing) and the northern one was opening up. Anyone got any more up to date info?
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by MartinLuther
(Post 7718411)
I haven't looked at this for a while but the last I heard was that the southern ozone hole was recovering (i.e. closing) and the northern one was opening up. Anyone got any more up to date info?
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718433)
Probably due to the Chinese hacking open all those old, discarded fridges that we have replaced (with Chinese units...)
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Burbage
(Post 7718481)
If it's a properly calculated index then it will be the same everywhere. The measurement 7 should indicate a set amount of UV exposure, in the same way that 20 degrees celcius is the same everywhere.
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718188)
Probably "42"?
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718433)
Probably due to the Chinese hacking open all those old, discarded fridges that we have replaced (with Chinese units...)
Originally Posted by Burbage
(Post 7718481)
If it's a properly calculated index then it will be the same everywhere. The measurement 7 should indicate a set amount of UV exposure, in the same way that 20 degrees celcius is the same everywhere.
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718486)
We were referring to the holes, not the numbers!
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
>>Are the holes not measure by the numbers? If so, are the numbers the same<<
Some of us have lost the thread - and I'm not sure that it's me <g>. Burbage was quoting me but I think referring to the OP with his post. I was quoting ML, who was straying off the OP into the ozone hole distribution. I'm getting a headache.... |
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718900)
>>Are the holes not measure by the numbers? If so, are the numbers the same<<
Some of us have lost the thread - and I'm not sure that it's me <g>. Burbage was quoting me but I think referring to the OP with his post. I was quoting ML, who was straying off the OP into the ozone hole distribution. I'm getting a headache.... |
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Burbage
(Post 7718925)
Sorry. Misplaced quote. Just was answering the question.
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718928)
Golly - staying on thread!
|
Re: A question about UV index and Ozone layer
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 7718900)
>>Are the holes not measure by the numbers? If so, are the numbers the same<<
Some of us have lost the thread - and I'm not sure that it's me <g>. Burbage was quoting me but I think referring to the OP with his post. I was quoting ML, who was straying off the OP into the ozone hole distribution. I'm getting a headache.... |
All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:01 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.