British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Barbie (https://britishexpats.com/forum/barbie-92/)
-   -   The new 747 takes to the sky (https://britishexpats.com/forum/barbie-92/new-747-takes-sky-653847/)

Lord_Farquar Feb 9th 2010 8:19 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Wol (Post 8325734)
Probably why I'm using XP instead of Vista....

Not 3.0?

Wol Feb 9th 2010 9:26 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar (Post 8325738)
Not 3.0?

No, I downgraded when moving from RISC-OS to Windoze.

Lord_Farquar Feb 9th 2010 6:41 pm

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Wol (Post 8325879)
No, I downgraded when moving from RISC-OS to Windoze.

:rofl: Brilliant.

I am glad some people have a sense of humour on here still!

Hebe Feb 9th 2010 6:54 pm

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar (Post 8325221)
I thought that. I think it's a concept for a VIP plane and most of the seating/internal arrangements will not make it onto normal planes.

You can bet your bottom dollar Boeing will manage to shoehorn more economy seats into the same space.

Surely the seating configuration is down to each airline who orders the plane?

koalakim Feb 9th 2010 10:04 pm

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 
Yep indeed! Still wonder who is going to order an 800 seater A380!

Although I like the A380 and A330 (hate the 340 and 320), I'm still more of a Boeing girl as at least they've kept some proper controls on their planes. Still doesn't seem right that a plane should be flown with a joystick! And we all know how much we can trust computers :D

Shame there aren't more passenger orders for the 747-8 as it is a much nicer design than the 380 which just looks like a lump until they do a stretched version.

Bring on the hypersonic space planes and then I can nip back to the UK for the odd weekend!

Wol Feb 10th 2010 9:03 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 
>>Although I like the A380 and A330 (hate the 340 and 320), I'm still more of a Boeing girl as at least they've kept some proper controls on their planes. Still doesn't seem right that a plane should be flown with a joystick! And we all know how much we can trust computers http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...es/biggrin.gif<<

Agreed: nothing like a few sturdy bits of string connecting the steering handles with the flappy bits!

bcworld Feb 10th 2010 9:25 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by koalakim (Post 8327808)
Although I like the A380 and A330 (hate the 340 and 320)

But a 340 is basically just a 330 with a couple of extra engines?

kporte Feb 10th 2010 9:36 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by bcworld (Post 8329223)
But a 340 is basically just a 330 with a couple of extra engines?

They're not sellotaped on are they?:ohmy:

Amazulu Feb 10th 2010 9:50 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by bcworld (Post 8329223)
But a 340 is basically just a 330 with a couple of extra engines?

Some of the earlier A340s (200 and 300 series) have performance issues, the 500 and 600 series are better.

bcworld Feb 10th 2010 9:51 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by kporte (Post 8329264)
They're not sellotaped on are they?:ohmy:

Stapled.

Actually, I got an upclose look at a Singapore A380 once...you'd be surprised at the amount of duct tape stuck on various bits and bobs. The captain walked around and took photos of it all - then half an hour later flew the plane out! :eek:

bcworld Feb 10th 2010 9:53 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Amazulu (Post 8329307)
Some of the earlier A340s (200 and 300 series) have performance issues, the 500 and 600 series are better.

Well the 500 is a commercial failure.

I know the 200/300 have trouble climbing but they get there in the end! :lol:

kporte Feb 10th 2010 9:56 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by bcworld (Post 8329311)
Stapled.

Actually, I got an upclose look at a Singapore A380 once...you'd be surprised at the amount of duct tape stuck on various bits and bobs. The captain walked around and took photos of it all - then half an hour later flew the plane out! :eek:

I always shut my eyes if boarding by stairway!

Amazulu Feb 10th 2010 10:06 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by bcworld (Post 8329316)
Well the 500 is a commercial failure.

I guess it fills a niche market - that is too niche!

I flew business class on an SAA 600 to Johannesburg about a year ago - a fantastic flight.

bcworld Feb 10th 2010 10:10 am

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Amazulu (Post 8329344)
I guess it fills a niche market - that is too niche!

I flew business class on an SAA 600 to Johannesburg about a year ago - a fantastic flight.

I like 'em.

Was on one of SIAs 500s to New York and I do remember that the take off roll went on and on and on and...

I guess we were carrying 18.5hrs of fuel though!

NELBHOY Feb 10th 2010 5:42 pm

Re: The new 747 takes to the sky
 

Originally Posted by Wol (Post 8329180)
>>Although I like the A380 and A330 (hate the 340 and 320), I'm still more of a Boeing girl as at least they've kept some proper controls on their planes. Still doesn't seem right that a plane should be flown with a joystick! And we all know how much we can trust computers http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...es/biggrin.gif<<

Agreed: nothing like a few sturdy bits of string connecting the steering handles with the flappy bits!

I used to think that way as well Wol. But the Airbus seem to be more reliable. I was always pro-Boeing, but Airbus are slowly winning me over. 9 out of 10 problems I come across can be reset simply by cycling a circuit breaker. Makes my job a bit boring though!!
On the downside the flight deck is a bit plasticy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:53 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.