Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by DadAgain
(Post 10167671)
Hmmmm.... people I dont rate who are generally highly rated?:
J.S. Bach? Genious - Perhaps, certainly *interesting* music (given his historical context) and very very cerebral.... but I find it emotionless. I'll play Bach from time to time - but in the same way as I'll play scales, arpegios and Kreutzeror Hannon studies and excercises - if it doesnt grab the soul its not Music.... Too much of Bachs music is like complex algebra - intriguing, unquestionably well thoguht out but exhausting to 'think through; without any real emotional pay-off. (I've heard stuffy 'died-in-the-wool' baroque freak musicians claim that I must be a completely uneducated philistine to not realise that Bach *is* god when it comes to music... pfffft) W.A. Mozart - Far far lesser extent than JSB above - but still I dont get the 'genius' of Mozart beyond that fact that his output was prolific even from a silly young age. Some of his stuff is quite nice... some even moderately powerful - but Mozarts music will never have the emotional pull for me that he clearly manages to evoke in other people.... For me musicians really woke up in the 19th century and started to make *real* MUSIC! Charlie Parker - Ok so I'm no Sax player... and really no Jazz freak either, but when Miles Davis was being the coolest guy in town and making timelessly awesome cool jazz, Parker (who is revered as a god in the jazz world) - seems to me to be just bubbling away with stuff that spoils the mood.... I guess that "Be-bop" jazz thing just isnt my scene? .... and then of course plenty of other mentioned above in the thread Clapton - a LOT of very dull output - but a couple of OK songs over the years. Totaly agree he needed the drugs to do anything even vaguely interesting. Oasis - Massively overrated in my opinion, far less creative and compelling than their peers Blur, who managed to be quite entertaining. ....could probably think of plenty of others who I regard as a disappointment across a wide variety of styles if I put my mind to it. Obviously aussie bogan rock is trash - but nobody other than aussie bogans tries to pretend otherwise..... :blink: :ohmy: Bach maybe..although maybe you're playing it wrong... But Mozart?! Really? *thud* |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by RedT
(Post 10167884)
:blink: :ohmy:
But Mozart?! Really? *thud* |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
(Post 10167889)
are you trying to suggest that Mozart had a really big penis?
|
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by RedT
(Post 10167884)
:blink: :ohmy:
Bach maybe..although maybe you're playing it wrong... But Mozart?! Really? *thud* Used to play to my kids when they were little. They listen to Linkin Park now :lol: |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by scottishcelts
(Post 10167905)
Stunned at Mozart too. :blink:
Used to play to my kids when they were little. They listen to Linkin Park now :lol: |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
(Post 10167907)
yeah, but how many top ten hits did he get?
- The Who. :thumbdown: |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by RedT
(Post 10167884)
..Bach maybe..although maybe you're playing it wrong...
and I did say Mozart to a far far lesse extent. I dont have a problem particularly with Mozart - I just think the adoration is a little OTT.. He produced some OK stuff and there is a kind of purity and simplicity to a lot of his composition that others in the same era didnt quite manage to achieve.... but he did produce some really dull background music too... and music didnt really get expressive and emotional until the Classical ("C" not "c") period was well and truly over. |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by scottishcelts
(Post 10167911)
- The Who. :thumbdown: |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Ballys
(Post 10167926)
.
|
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by earlybird
(Post 10167620)
|
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Dorothy
(Post 10167944)
Ok, I now officially hate you. I have that stupid ****ing ad stuck in my head. :frown:
Does get in your head though. |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by scottishcelts
(Post 10167929)
They.is.crap. Innit.
and raise you Simple Minds:thumbdown: All Sweaty Socks love em:) p.s I just googled images sweaty sock....I think I will change my safe search to ON in future |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Dorothy
(Post 10167944)
Ok, I now officially hate you. I have that stupid ****ing ad stuck in my head. :frown:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IGPi9zXqc |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Ballys
(Post 10167961)
Ok I will cover your Who jibe
and raise you Simple Minds:thumbdown: All Sweaty Socks love em:) |
Re: Musicians/bands you think are $hite whilst others think they are the dogs bollock
Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
(Post 10167963)
Actually I'm at work so don't have any idea what that video is of. YouTube is blocked here. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.