![]() |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 10149518)
What bugged me the most was the way it is presented. "Hey earn under this amount and you can save yourself ........ "...encouraging people to earn as little as they can to save a bit of tax is just wrong. .
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by lapin_windstar
(Post 10149815)
But that is not how the system works and I don't think that is the message in the ads, is it?
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 10149727)
Rudd comes along with his stupid catchphrases, working families, fair go, shake of the sauce bottle............. and they suck him up.
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
The Labour government want you earning an average wage and be married with kids. Strange when the prime minister tries to convince us all that its perfectly normal to not be married (her way out of approving gay marriage).
As much as I dislike Tony Abbott, I'm through dealing with a bullshitter for prime minister. When she says the Australian people will be compensated for price hikes, she admits she believes there will be hikes. But who exactly benefits? Families on average incomes. Who funds it? Single people on above average wages. It's all ****ed up! |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 10150004)
When she says the Australian people will be compensated for price hikes, she admits she believes there will be hikes. But who exactly benefits? Families on average incomes. Who funds it? Single people on above average wages.
Those who earn above average have always propped up lower income earners. |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by Dreamy
(Post 10151074)
.. and families on above average incomes.
Those who earn above average have always propped up lower income earners. |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by carolinephillips
(Post 10151138)
Yes, but it is hitting those who earn just above average really hard, not just the wealthy. Our income is going to take a serious beating, especially with the changes to the medicare/private health scheme.
Problem is the govt seems to think a family on $100,000 is wealthy:frown:. They know its not but they need a tax scapegoat. On 100k After tax and all the penalites for being 'rich' a family would probably be better off earning 50k and getting all the welfare/tax benefits/perks that go with that income. We just got our health insurance down, ( by cutting out some cover ) but now the extortionate electricity increases will wipe that saving out. Amusing really, already we sit at night with one light on, yelling turn that telly/computer off, yet we are rich according to the govt. After the latest electricity rises the partner started heating water for a cuppa on the log burner, I am like great we are now hillbillies living in the woods :lol: |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 10151177)
Amusing really, already we sit at night with one light on |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 10150004)
The Labour government want you earning an average wage and be married with kids. Strange when the prime minister tries to convince us all that its perfectly normal to not be married (her way out of approving gay marriage).
As much as I dislike Tony Abbott, I'm through dealing with a bullshitter for prime minister. When she says the Australian people will be compensated for price hikes, she admits she believes there will be hikes. But who exactly benefits? Families on average incomes. Who funds it? Single people on above average wages. It's all ****ed up! |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
(Post 10151204)
...except the Opposition's Paid Parental Leave plan is no different to the Carbon Tax. It is a tax that will be imposed on companies that will be forced to pass on to the consumer in the form of price hikes. Don't be fooled into thinking you are getting a completely different product by changing party. It's the same BS repackaged and marketed as something totally different.
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 10151205)
Explain
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
(Post 10151214)
...well the Opposition's plan to fund the paid parental leave scheme is to impose an extra 1.5% tax increase on businesses, regardless of how well they perform. The Carbon Tax effects on businesses at least can be managed and potentially reduced based on any company's decreasing production of carbon. The 1.5% levy (as the Libs call it, not a tax of course!!!!) is exactly that!
However, the opposition government wouldn't be in a hurry to remove the carbon tax and might end up saying 'it's impossible to remove it, now that it's in'. You make a fair point about this levy offered by the opposition, though. The current government says that don't agree with a lower earner subsidizing my Medicare and so cut my rebate. Yet, don't think for a second that it might be something I hardly if ever use. Similar to this parental leave levy. Although, this is directly thrown on me by this fisherprice government. |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 10151236)
I can't see that being as expensive as this carbon tax as these top 500 companies have been given license to steal seeing as the Australian government overvalues the price on carbon.
|
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by lapin_windstar
(Post 10151334)
huh?
But the real problem is the fact that there is little happening to actually fix the environment. A tax doesn't fix the worlds problems. It just moves money around. Where's the incentive for companies to change to greener alternatives when all they have to do is charge more? |
Re: Increase to the tax free threshold
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 10151177)
On 100k After tax and all the penalites for being 'rich' a family would probably be better off earning 50k and getting all the welfare/tax benefits/perks that go with that income.
Would they really though? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:57 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.