|
Re: Headless chickens
Another clueless Luddite. Fibre beats the crap out of DSL. Libs plan is 30 billion for something that will decay as copper does.
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 10742160)
Approved by the liberals huh?
So nice to see they are concentrating on getting all their policies out there. What has it been so far, a NBN replacement that reaches ADSL2 speeds for $50bn, oh and Tony saying he'll cut taxes, but WON'T cut the offsets from those taxes, but WILL cut the deficit. Hmm, there's some hidden shit in that sandwich methinks... Maybe we can see why the concentration on childish name calling, rather than detailed policy discussions .... Try this for an answer: http://youtube.com/watch?v=pJTX0iWYX9A |
Re: Headless chickens
Tow em back to Indonesia. Umm Indonesia says **** off.
|
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 10746973)
Another clueless Luddite. Fibre beats the crap out of DSL. Libs plan is 30 billion for something that will decay as copper does.
|
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 10743255)
The left/socialists/other assorted losers/parasites have had their chance, and as usual (as all over the world) have f**ked it up
Time to turn right |
Re: Headless chickens
Here's a classic UK Labour incompetence moment: :rofl:
|
Re: Headless chickens
Left v right is simplistic tosh and a matter of self justification of entrenched positions.
|
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 10746973)
Another clueless Luddite. Fibre beats the crap out of DSL. Libs plan is 30 billion for something that will decay as copper does.
I'm FOR doing the NBN; not thinking that VDSL will be any use. How is that a luddite position? The clueless position is the one that thinks Telstra will hand over their entire copper network, to the government, for free. Just how crassly incompetent, or lying, conniving fraud do you have to be to put that little gem forward? |
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 10747685)
Left v right is simplistic tosh and a matter of self justification of entrenched positions.
(btw, I get what you mean about the simplistic tosh bit. The only reason the left have been elected in recent decades is because they imitated the right - only to be kicked out again when their true colours were seen). |
Re: Headless chickens
Gillard is now playing the gender and abortion cards. Surely this won't deliver more votes to her party? :unsure:
|
Re: Headless chickens
If Abbott wasn't a religious right wing nut job then no. He has history on this front but will only affect the female vote.
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 10751708)
Gillard is now playing the gender and abortion cards. Surely this won't deliver more votes to her party? :unsure:
|
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 10752308)
If Abbott wasn't a religious right wing nut job then no. He has history on this front but will only affect the female vote.
|
Re: Headless chickens
It will be. Abbott denying abortion drugs is the big target.
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 10753165)
Julia and her penchant for attempting to ignite gender wars looks like the bigger nut job from where I'm sitting. It would be interesting to hear what most female voters think of her behaviour.
|
Re: Headless chickens
Originally Posted by IvanM
(Post 10754114)
It will be. Abbott denying abortion drugs is the big target.
|
Re: Headless chickens
All medical procedures have risks to be assessed by doctors, not religious nuts.
Originally Posted by paulry
(Post 10754186)
Abortion drugs sounds scary
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:14 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.