![]() |
Drones
So with the new CASA rules it doesn't look like you can fly with 5km of an airfield - does this include Helicopter landing pads?
Found this site which seems to map the restricted zones. If I look at Sydney, options are pretty thin. http://www.wickedcopters.com.au/page/apps/ |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12145440)
So with the new CASA rules it doesn't look like you can fly with 5km of an airfield - does this include Helicopter landing pads?
Found this site which seems to map the restricted zones. If I look at Sydney, options are pretty thin. Apps The place it could get really interesting is at the intersection of drone heights, flight paths, and noise envelopes. The aviation community has conventionally ignored the complaints of those they overfly at a low height causing noise disturbance. Now those same people are going to get told "because of the aviation noise you suffer from, no delivery drones for you". I get the feeling they are going to tell the aviation industry in no uncertain terms to take a running jump and that they can no longer fly so low or determine that airspace - invalidating many airports. Of course, we could take a good free market view of it and say that air users have to pay for access, and for disturbance caused - with the money winning out (as it usually does). |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 12145541)
It's pretty obvious that these aren't viable rules going forward and that CASA are going to have to be dragged in the direction of sanity eventually. In particular those helicopter landing pad exclusion zone are going to have to go. The problem with a bureaucratic mindset is the idea that just because you had a committee and defined some (usually regressive/conservative) view of the world, everyone is going to follow you. Bad rules are worse than no rules since people just ignore they whole thing - as they have been.
The place it could get really interesting is at the intersection of drone heights, flight paths, and noise envelopes. The aviation community has conventionally ignored the complaints of those they overfly at a low height causing noise disturbance. Now those same people are going to get told "because of the aviation noise you suffer from, no delivery drones for you". I get the feeling they are going to tell the aviation industry in no uncertain terms to take a running jump and that they can no longer fly so low or determine that airspace - invalidating many airports. Of course, we could take a good free market view of it and say that air users have to pay for access, and for disturbance caused - with the money winning out (as it usually does). |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12145440)
So with the new CASA rules it doesn't look like you can fly with 5km of an airfield - does this include Helicopter landing pads?
Found this site which seems to map the restricted zones. If I look at Sydney, options are pretty thin. Apps Happy New Year. :cool: |
Re: Drones
https://www.suasnews.com/2017/01/virginia-tech-assessing-injury-risk-unmanned-aircraft/
Here you go Garry. Keep an eye on these studies. When the results are through you can send them to CASA. |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12145440)
So with the new CASA rules it doesn't look like you can fly with 5km of an airfield - does this include Helicopter landing pads?
Found this site which seems to map the restricted zones. If I look at Sydney, options are pretty thin. Apps It's a bit OTT but CASA are a bit more switched on to recreational drone use compared to the FAA |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 12147587)
That rule has been around for all model aircraft for a while
It's a bit OTT but CASA are a bit more switched on to recreational drone use compared to the FAA |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12147683)
So where do you fly your drones to keep within the rules?
Don't stress too much about the 5km rule - just be sensible. Don't fly too high, near people, keep the drone in sight etc - unlike this asshole: |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 12148660)
At the park, out in the bush, at the beach
Don't stress too much about the 5km rule - just be sensible. Don't fly too high, near people, keep the drone in sight etc - unlike this asshole: |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12148711)
I had it flying in a pretty quiet section of a park the other evening. Dog walkers kept coming through, a few of them stopped for a chat (within 30m). Their dogs wanted to get the chops on the drone. Time to leave.
|
Re: Drones
I started making drone films for fun and to promote my photography business early last year and am going to get licensed very soon. The laws around where you can and can't fly a drone are incredibly restrictive and, like so many things in Australia, every organisation/government body wants to have a say in it. That said, people do fly them stupidly - right over the top of extremely busy beaches, around Sydney Harbour, off hotel balconies at night - I've seen 'em all. Sooner or later someone's going to hurt someone with a drone and the suddenly thousands of recreational flyers will be left with expensive paperweights.
There's a senate review coming towards the middle of this year when, hopefully, a lot of it will resolved. |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Hutch
(Post 12154636)
I started making drone films for fun and to promote my photography business early last year and am going to get licensed very soon. The laws around where you can and can't fly a drone are incredibly restrictive and, like so many things in Australia, every organisation/government body wants to have a say in it. That said, people do fly them stupidly - right over the top of extremely busy beaches, around Sydney Harbour, off hotel balconies at night - I've seen 'em all. Sooner or later someone's going to hurt someone with a drone and the suddenly thousands of recreational flyers will be left with expensive paperweights.
There's a senate review coming towards the middle of this year when, hopefully, a lot of it will resolved. I was on a Christmas cruise on Sydney Harbour where they were flying a drone and capturing snaps of people on the boat. The pilot swore he new all the rules and was complying. Yep needs some clear guidelines |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12154641)
The current laws say that commercial use needs approval / license. So it looks like your photography business falls into that category. Even posting you droned video on youtube needs a license as the video can be for commercial use.
I was on a Christmas cruise on Sydney Harbour where they were flying a drone and capturing snaps of people on the boat. The pilot swore he new all the rules and was complying. Yep needs some clear guidelines |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Hutch
(Post 12154644)
I'm well aware of the laws mate, sounds like you aren't. There was a change to CASA regs in September 2016, whereby any drone under 2kg (which mine is) can be flown commercially when abiding by standard drone operating procedures - 120m height, 30m from people, boats, vehicles and buildings, never over populous areas, 5.5km from airfields etc etc. You need to get an ARN (which I have) and notify CASA five days prior to first flight (which I did).
You mean these laws for the under 2kg commercial flights? https://www.casa.gov.au/standard-pag...raft-under-2kg Still requires time consuming actions. Can't just get up in the morning and say "hey I want to take some stunning images of that beautiful sunset" and post them on Facebook. |
Re: Drones
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 12154648)
Still requires time consuming actions. Can't just get up in the morning and say "hey I want to take some stunning images of that beautiful sunset" and post them on Facebook.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:55 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.