View Poll Results: Do you smoke? (anonymous poll)
Yes




8
10.96%
No, I've quit




31
42.47%
No, never




34
46.58%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll
Do You Smoke?
#46










Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,668



If you're going to argue Creature, at least be logical. Your reasoning, is at best, flawed.

#47
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


http://fsid.org.uk/document.doc?id=97
Over 300 babies still die every year as cot deaths in the UK
That's about 3 times your Aus number isn't it?
Over 300 babies still die every year as cot deaths in the UK
That's about 3 times your Aus number isn't it?
In the last two min I've found numbers for Australia that range from 80 to 300+. Looks like you can pick any number you fancy for either country..... none of which means squat in reality.

#48
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


How much is my chance of contracting lung cancer increased by, if I sit across an open air bar, from somebody having a cig? Somewhere between zero and infinitesimally small?

#49
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


Of course it is. It's no different to inhaling any other tiny particle coated in carcinogens which enters the lung but can't ever come out again.
The same goes for inhaling a cloud of diesel exhaust emissions of course. This is when you get into arguments about people's 'rights' to do something. Drive vs smoking etc.
The same goes for inhaling a cloud of diesel exhaust emissions of course. This is when you get into arguments about people's 'rights' to do something. Drive vs smoking etc.

#50

I can come up with countless things that it's "wise to avoid". The level of risk involved is, or at least should be, the driving factor.
How much is my chance of contracting lung cancer increased by, if I sit across an open air bar, from somebody having a cig? Somewhere between zero and infinitesimally small?
How much is my chance of contracting lung cancer increased by, if I sit across an open air bar, from somebody having a cig? Somewhere between zero and infinitesimally small?

#51

Through no choice of my own I had to spend 6 months researching this.
I was the one in the lab coat chucking human lungs in a blender then boiling them in sodium hydroxide for 2 days. Took a while before I was able to make spag bol again!

#52










Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,668


How often you do it.
Your predisposition to having lung cancer.
How much you inhale.
I like my air as clean as I can get it.

#53
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


OK. Then we will have to agree to disagree.

#56
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057.abstract
That's a study of nearly 120,000 people.... not just two blokes in a bar.

#57

Well if we are going to set off just chucking links at one another....
http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057.abstract
That's a study of nearly 120,000 people.... not just two blokes in a bar.
http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057.abstract
That's a study of nearly 120,000 people.... not just two blokes in a bar.
Jus' sayin...not sayin it's bad research...jus' sayin.

#58

Even if you completely discount the health issues not being in the pocket of Big Tobacco is a large motivator for not doing it.
That and being addicted to anything is bad. And the costs. For no benefit (it don't relax you, it doesn't keep you thin, it does nothing a smoker says it does).
I'm not going to go all righteous ex-smoker on yo ass, I understand why people do it and how they justify it.
I was that soldier. 20 years of it.
The "Would you encourage your kids/partner/mother to smoke?" question is one worth pondering. Let's be honest, nobody would and the vast majority of smokers would like to go back to before they started.
To anyone interested and hasn't heard me bang on about it before, I read Allan Carr's "Easy Way To Stop Smoking". It don't preach it just removes the brainwashing.
If you don't want something you can't miss it. No willpower required.
Having said all that the government should make them illegal, stop collecting the tax or STFU with the nannying.
That and being addicted to anything is bad. And the costs. For no benefit (it don't relax you, it doesn't keep you thin, it does nothing a smoker says it does).
I'm not going to go all righteous ex-smoker on yo ass, I understand why people do it and how they justify it.
I was that soldier. 20 years of it.
The "Would you encourage your kids/partner/mother to smoke?" question is one worth pondering. Let's be honest, nobody would and the vast majority of smokers would like to go back to before they started.
To anyone interested and hasn't heard me bang on about it before, I read Allan Carr's "Easy Way To Stop Smoking". It don't preach it just removes the brainwashing.
If you don't want something you can't miss it. No willpower required.

Having said all that the government should make them illegal, stop collecting the tax or STFU with the nannying.

#59
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,188


Enstrom is a controversial figure who has accepted funding from the Philip Morris tobacco company and the Center for Indoor Air Research (a tobacco industry front group), and subsequently published research that contradicted scientific consensus about the health effects of secondhand tobacco smoke, also known as environmental tobacco smoke, or ETS.
Jus' sayin...not sayin it's bad research...jus' sayin.
Jus' sayin...not sayin it's bad research...jus' sayin.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/19/1440.short

#60

Of course he is.... I assume all these are as well?
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/19/1440.short
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/19/1440.short
