View Poll Results: Is Julia Gillard a bare-faced liar?
Gillard is justified in breaking her pre-election promise.
14
18.67%
Gillard is a bare faced liar and has no mandate to impose a carbon tax.
61
81.33%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll
Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
#481
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
>>The Gillard/Brown carbon tax is classic hard-left wealth redistribution - nothing more, nothing less.<<
You should be careful eating that out-of-date biltong, Amazulu - the toxins can do untold damage....
You should be careful eating that out-of-date biltong, Amazulu - the toxins can do untold damage....
#482
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Is dictionary.com good enough for you:-
any substance, as certain chemicals or waste products, that renders the air, soil, water, or other natural resource harmful or unsuitable for a specific purpose.
I don't see how CO2 renders the air harmful, or unsuitable for a specific purpose. As has previously been pointed out, plants love it.
any substance, as certain chemicals or waste products, that renders the air, soil, water, or other natural resource harmful or unsuitable for a specific purpose.
I don't see how CO2 renders the air harmful, or unsuitable for a specific purpose. As has previously been pointed out, plants love it.
Its pretty obvious its a pollutant.
What it may do in lower concentrations and different contexts is besides the point. It's man made pollution.
What words I might have used are minimal in comparison to the disgust I feel at those who can blithely ignore reality, claim that black is white, and through that ignorant attitude cause so much destruction down the line.
#483
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 823
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Via differential irradiance it increases temperature to a level that adversely effects the environment making it difficult for species to survive and putting the entire ecosystem at risk.
Its pretty obvious its a pollutant.
What it may do in lower concentrations and different contexts is besides the point. It's man made pollution.
NO, 300ppm > 390ppm is a 30% increase. And its not minuscule in terms of the effect, the only terms that matter.
I don't think you realise how much your statements piss me off. It's a serious subject and you play the troll (I'm assuming you are claiming black is white with full understanding its laughable). That a viewpoint that millions of ignorant americans also hold - and they are effectively killing millions of people down the line because they don't want to take it seriously. What do you call someone who kills millions because they won't face realities like adults?
What words I might have used are minimal in comparison to the disgust I feel at those who can blithely ignore reality, claim that black is white, and through that ignorant attitude cause so much destruction down the line.
Its pretty obvious its a pollutant.
What it may do in lower concentrations and different contexts is besides the point. It's man made pollution.
NO, 300ppm > 390ppm is a 30% increase. And its not minuscule in terms of the effect, the only terms that matter.
I don't think you realise how much your statements piss me off. It's a serious subject and you play the troll (I'm assuming you are claiming black is white with full understanding its laughable). That a viewpoint that millions of ignorant americans also hold - and they are effectively killing millions of people down the line because they don't want to take it seriously. What do you call someone who kills millions because they won't face realities like adults?
What words I might have used are minimal in comparison to the disgust I feel at those who can blithely ignore reality, claim that black is white, and through that ignorant attitude cause so much destruction down the line.
http://www.davidarchibald.info/papers/SolarCycle24.pdf
It will be an interesting time over the next few years to see which way the climate does indeed go, hotter or cooler there's plenty of evidence to support either theory.
Insulting people and saying they're going to be responsible for the deaths of millions is going a bit too far hey chap?
Reducing emissions and recycling more can only benefit everything, however new taxes are not going to solve anything. You can guarantee the money will not be redistributed evenly to compensate those who lose their jobs.
#486
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Not at all the back cover tells you that snippet, not in the same wording granted. If you don't have a copy [Tandia] I'll bring our one down in April
All his books have a death or two Hevs it's just how he writes.
Whitethorn is good as well. But the Solomon's Song trilogy is one of my favourite books
Are we sufficiently off topic yet?
All his books have a death or two Hevs it's just how he writes.
Whitethorn is good as well. But the Solomon's Song trilogy is one of my favourite books
Are we sufficiently off topic yet?
Last edited by cresta57; Mar 21st 2011 at 11:52 am.
#487
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Not at all the back cover tells you that snippet, not in the same wording granted. If you don't have a copy [Tandia] I'll bring our one down in April
All his books have a death or two Hevs it's just how he writes.
Whitethorn is good as well. But the Solomon's Song trilogy is one of my favourite books
Are we sufficiently off topic yet?
All his books have a death or two Hevs it's just how he writes.
Whitethorn is good as well. But the Solomon's Song trilogy is one of my favourite books
Are we sufficiently off topic yet?
I have read a few and love them
#488
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Still missing the point. Carbon tax is to change consumption/pollution primarily. If its revenue neutral, it makes nobody rich, by definition.
Maybe you can get a clue of how serious this is. You sticking you fingers in your ears isn't acceptable. You are literally playing with the lives of millions, that's how serious it is. Get it? You are the one threatening to kill people because you won't accept reality.
You don't seem to know what truly left wing policies are, and seem to play the dumb US far right position of tagging anything you don't like as 'lefty'. You got it wrong, since you tagged a money based approach as left, rather than the capitalist approach it is.
CO2 is still a pollutant, by definition.
Anthropomorphic Climate Change is most definitely happening - both in that you can see the CO2 level rising due to pollution, and that climate is responding (particular in polar regions). You can't claim black is white and expect to be taken seriously - and held to account.
Maybe you can get a clue of how serious this is. You sticking you fingers in your ears isn't acceptable. You are literally playing with the lives of millions, that's how serious it is. Get it? You are the one threatening to kill people because you won't accept reality.
You don't seem to know what truly left wing policies are, and seem to play the dumb US far right position of tagging anything you don't like as 'lefty'. You got it wrong, since you tagged a money based approach as left, rather than the capitalist approach it is.
CO2 is still a pollutant, by definition.
Anthropomorphic Climate Change is most definitely happening - both in that you can see the CO2 level rising due to pollution, and that climate is responding (particular in polar regions). You can't claim black is white and expect to be taken seriously - and held to account.
MMGW is not happening
it is what it is
#489
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
carbon is not a pollutant
MMGW is not happening
it is what it is
#492
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
You may as well keep on posting your racist bile - you're going to get away with it anyway
Party on, Hard Yards
Last edited by Amazulu; Mar 21st 2011 at 12:22 pm.
#493
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Garry, have a read of some research by this chap from Perth called David Archibald. It's interesting stuff, solar cycle 24 has recently occurred.
http://www.davidarchibald.info/papers/SolarCycle24.pdf
It will be an interesting time over the next few years to see which way the climate does indeed go, hotter or cooler there's plenty of evidence to support either theory.
http://www.davidarchibald.info/papers/SolarCycle24.pdf
It will be an interesting time over the next few years to see which way the climate does indeed go, hotter or cooler there's plenty of evidence to support either theory.
http://n3xus6.blogspot.com/2007/02/dd.html
Yep, its really that bad.
PS solar irradiance is data that's measured and incorporated.
People hear 1C, 2C even 5C and think "oh, it will be like summer in autumn; I can handle that. They never seem to take onboard that its climate, not weather, and that the knock on effects of that simple number are so dramatic. There's the mismatch between crops and weather, the more extreme weather, the feedback effects, the acidification of the ocean, the availability of water, the rising sea levels, the failing ice caps, the ocean circulation - and a hundred other interrelated system that all get a sledgehammer applied to them by that little number.
It doesn't cover the full extent of the hit in the same way "some poor people in the US will be charged an extra 2% mortgage interest" doesn't cover the global financial meltdown.
Now the reason that such small changes have such big effects is just how picky humanity is for survival, and how over populated the globe is at the moment. If things go wrong on a global scale, those feedback loops in human society act to magnify the effect; like derivatives did in the financial market. Before you know where you are you have 50 millions staving people from one country trying to get into another because the crops failed and the government collapsed.
As I say, millions is playing things down.
#494
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
Dude, this post is out there for everyone to see - and yet again nobody bats an eyelid and some even engage you in conversation about it. And as usual, the mods do nothing. Yet again, the massive double standards on BE are on display.
You may as well keep on posting your racist bile - you're going to get away with it anyway
Party on, Hard Yards
You may as well keep on posting your racist bile - you're going to get away with it anyway
Party on, Hard Yards
Do we ban him for mentioning a fruit?
Yes we all also know what the inference is here & it's not clever.
You have to accept that not all are blessed with the same level of intelligence. A mechanical engineer interacting with a bloke that lifts boxes for a living, did you really expect an articulate answer?
#495
Re: Carbon Tax: Julia Gillard a Bare Faced Liar?
That's not true as you well know. The first time he was banned for a week, this time he carefully placed lime at the bottom. While we all know he's baiting you do you report it? No!
Do we ban him for mentioning a fruit?
Yes we all also know what the inference is here & it's not clever.
You have to accept that not all are blessed with the same level of intelligence. A mechanical engineer interacting with a bloke that lifts boxes for a living, did you really expect an articulate answer?
Do we ban him for mentioning a fruit?
Yes we all also know what the inference is here & it's not clever.
You have to accept that not all are blessed with the same level of intelligence. A mechanical engineer interacting with a bloke that lifts boxes for a living, did you really expect an articulate answer?
Articulate answer? No - he is what he is, so fair point