![]() |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by commonwealth
(Post 10195660)
money should be invested in active investments not passive ones. i doubt the govt can manage active investments. why not just give it to private businesses and humans in the form of tax cuts?
i'm not very convinced SWFs are the way to go. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Reply to commonwealth -
Rephrase my earlier post - I don't believe tax cuts are good for economies who don't manufacture their own consumables. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
lets help the poorer countries who manufacture the goods by buying their goods. after all, they buy our minerals and energy. it's a money merry go round which is the idea behind free trade. unfortunately the free trade was derailed by the ****wits of wall street and canary wharf.
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by jimbo_d
(Post 10195652)
This post highlights how little some people know about mining. The States allow companies to mine the land for a royalty fee which is used to benefit the people living in the state. There is an enormous amount of risk in setting up and operating a mine, hence the massive profits when it pays off. Talk of nationalisation would just leave all the stuff in the ground as no state would gamble billions of tax payer money.
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by commonwealth
(Post 10195660)
money should be invested in active investments not passive ones. i doubt the govt can manage active investments. why not just give it to private businesses and humans in the form of tax cuts?
i'm not very convinced SWFs are the way to go. As we are probably never going to be a low taxed country, we need things like SWFs. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by commonwealth
(Post 10195660)
money should be invested in active investments not passive ones. i doubt the govt can manage active investments. why not just give it to private businesses and humans in the form of tax cuts?
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by JoeBloggs80
(Post 10195715)
Not doubting you but do you have any examples of companies that invested millions to mine in australia and failed?
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...e-town/3096986 |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 10195719)
I agree about the tax cuts, and your opinion on SWFs - if we were a low taxed country, but we're not. If a political party was to come along and say that we are going to go to a 20% flat-rate tax for all but that they are going to cut all tax breaks and slash welfare in half, I would vote for them, but they would never get elected. Reason being that too many people have a vested interest in keeping the system as it is, ie taking more out of taxation than they put in.
As we are probably never going to be a low taxed country, we need things like SWFs. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by Zen10
(Post 10195777)
45% top rate is a low taxed country.
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 10195802)
I disagree. When you take GST, customs duties, CGT, state taxes and duties, fuel levy etc, we are a highly taxed nation. Yes, there are some great tax breaks available, but with a flat-rate system you could do away with them. When 40-odd% of people are taking more out than they put in, the only way to balance the budget is excessive wealth redistribution.
I appreciate there was no healthcare levy etc back when Eisenhower was taking 92% of the rich's wages, but even with all the things you mention, the average Australian pays nowhere near 92% of their salary to the state. That is what I call a high tax state and why I don't regard Australia to be a high tax state, or even Britain with its 12% NI. (The rich of course only pay 2% or 1% NI). |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 10195802)
I disagree. When you take GST, customs duties, CGT, state taxes and duties, fuel levy etc, we are a highly taxed nation. Yes, there are some great tax breaks available, but with a flat-rate system you could do away with them. When 40-odd% of people are taking more out than they put in, the only way to balance the budget is excessive wealth redistribution.
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by mulben
(Post 10195762)
I might be reading it wrong, but it seems there the story is more BHP letting down the local community by making promises and then selling up and shipping out. They still sold the land for hundreds of millions and still have loads of extremely profitable operations in the country. I know investment in mining needs a lot of capital to invest and there are obviously some risks as with everything but I think to call it 'a gamble' with the amount of money being made there is stretching it. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by JoeBloggs80
(Post 10195817)
Thanks.
I might be reading it wrong, but it seems there the story is more BHP letting down the local community by making promises and then selling up and shipping out. They still sold the land for hundreds of millions and still have loads of extremely profitable operations in the country. I know investment in mining needs a lot of capital to invest and there are obviously some risks as with everything but I think to call it 'a gamble' with the amount of money being made there is stretching it. The way to hedge is in the futures market but not all miners do this and the ones who do will have much lower profits. |
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Could I ask what you think a reasonable total tax bill should be :
|
Re: Britain: an economic train wreck
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 10195836)
Could I ask what you think a reasonable total tax bill should be :
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:05 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.