Wiser to resubmit/update/start afresh or nominate ?
#1
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 37
Hi,
Thanx for counselling me on this problem:
I've recently undertaken the final steps for my PR136 (medicals, police, etc)
I'd want my girlfriend to have a visa too, but I didn't included her at the time I did my application.
What the best solution ?
- Ask to the Office asap
- Start afresh
- Try to update
- Nominate/sponsor her once I get my PR ?
What are her odds to get a visa given she's a young graduate in French teaching,
and I already have 125 pts ?
Cheers,
In the same app, can a guy get a visa and not the spouse,
or do they both fail or success ?
Thanx for counselling me on this problem:
I've recently undertaken the final steps for my PR136 (medicals, police, etc)
I'd want my girlfriend to have a visa too, but I didn't included her at the time I did my application.
What the best solution ?
- Ask to the Office asap
- Start afresh
- Try to update
- Nominate/sponsor her once I get my PR ?
What are her odds to get a visa given she's a young graduate in French teaching,
and I already have 125 pts ?
Cheers,
In the same app, can a guy get a visa and not the spouse,
or do they both fail or success ?
#2
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
I'm not sure of the process but you do need to prove that you and your girlfriend have been living together for the last 12 months and that the relationship is a genuine one.
Your best bet is to contact the DIMA office.
Your best bet is to contact the DIMA office.
#3
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 37
Thanx Magwired,
Yes I agree with you, and we can prove our genuine background without any problem, as we've been sharing a joint account + many boarding passes for more than 2.5 years !
Actually, I've just sent a request for advice to my DIMA Office in Paris today.
I think that a current visa can only be cancelled if a new one is GRANTED, so as long as I pay, they will process our case, won't they ?
Yes I agree with you, and we can prove our genuine background without any problem, as we've been sharing a joint account + many boarding passes for more than 2.5 years !
Actually, I've just sent a request for advice to my DIMA Office in Paris today.
I think that a current visa can only be cancelled if a new one is GRANTED, so as long as I pay, they will process our case, won't they ?
Originally posted by Magwired
I'm not sure of the process but you do need to prove that you and your girlfriend have been living together for the last 12 months and that the relationship is a genuine one.
Your best bet is to contact the DIMA office.
I'm not sure of the process but you do need to prove that you and your girlfriend have been living together for the last 12 months and that the relationship is a genuine one.
Your best bet is to contact the DIMA office.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dear Tropicalm,
It should cost you no more to have your gf included in the application as a de facto.
The only major problem is explaining why she was not included as a de facto in your
original application.
Best regards
George Lombard
www.austimmigration.com.au tropicalm
>
>
>
the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
It should cost you no more to have your gf included in the application as a de facto.
The only major problem is explaining why she was not included as a de facto in your
original application.
Best regards
George Lombard
www.austimmigration.com.au tropicalm
>
>
>
the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
#5
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 37
You're right George,
And I that is exactly what I explained in my letter to the DIMA:
I did not know that the correct (and shorter) solution to live in Oz with my gf was to include her, I did not know that "de facto spouse" encompassed my gf at that time, but I can prove a genuine relationship for more than 2 years without any problem.(It's only later than I got more info, especially in this forum!).
Anyway, we're gathering tons of proofs right now.
I long for their reply, I hope they'll understand my mistake. At worst I lodge another application for us both in Adelaide.
Merry x-Mas to Everyone!
tropicalm
And I that is exactly what I explained in my letter to the DIMA:
I did not know that the correct (and shorter) solution to live in Oz with my gf was to include her, I did not know that "de facto spouse" encompassed my gf at that time, but I can prove a genuine relationship for more than 2 years without any problem.(It's only later than I got more info, especially in this forum!).
Anyway, we're gathering tons of proofs right now.
I long for their reply, I hope they'll understand my mistake. At worst I lodge another application for us both in Adelaide.
Merry x-Mas to Everyone!
tropicalm
Originally posted by George Lombard
Dear Tropicalm,
It should cost you no more to have your gf included in the application as a de facto.
The only major problem is explaining why she was not included as a de facto in your
original application.
Best regards
George Lombard
www.austimmigration.com.au tropicalm
>
>
>
the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Dear Tropicalm,
It should cost you no more to have your gf included in the application as a de facto.
The only major problem is explaining why she was not included as a de facto in your
original application.
Best regards
George Lombard
www.austimmigration.com.au tropicalm
>
>
>
the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
There is also the advantage that if she is successfully added to his independent
skilled application, she will be a permanent resident herself in her own right from
arrival in Australia.
As opposed to coming in through the Spouse stream (even if it was possible in this
case) where she would probably be a temporary resident for the first two years. It
would also mean the effective waiting time for Aus citizenship would be 4 years
rather than 2.
Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
skilled application, she will be a permanent resident herself in her own right from
arrival in Australia.
As opposed to coming in through the Spouse stream (even if it was possible in this
case) where she would probably be a temporary resident for the first two years. It
would also mean the effective waiting time for Aus citizenship would be 4 years
rather than 2.
Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
#7
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 37
Thanx for your comment Jaj
Thanx Jaj,
that's correct,
and we're waiting for the decision of the DIMA as to add her...
that's correct,
and we're waiting for the decision of the DIMA as to add her...
Originally posted by Jaj
There is also the advantage that if she is successfully added to his independent
skilled application, she will be a permanent resident herself in her own right from
arrival in Australia.
As opposed to coming in through the Spouse stream (even if it was possible in this
case) where she would probably be a temporary resident for the first two years. It
would also mean the effective waiting time for Aus citizenship would be 4 years
rather than 2.
Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
There is also the advantage that if she is successfully added to his independent
skilled application, she will be a permanent resident herself in her own right from
arrival in Australia.
As opposed to coming in through the Spouse stream (even if it was possible in this
case) where she would probably be a temporary resident for the first two years. It
would also mean the effective waiting time for Aus citizenship would be 4 years
rather than 2.
Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
#8
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 37
Embassy's Beautiful !
Hi all,
Quite quickly, and although I took the medicals 45 days ago, the Embassy in Paris has accepted my request to add my de-facto spouse though I hadn't done it when I signed my application back in July 2001.
As George said, they simply asked for a handful of documents proving the grounds of a genuine relationship between us, and the famous fear "why did you declare you were not in a relationship in July?".
As we have answers to both problems, I think this affair should pass.
As always, a 49-day period is granted to allow us time to give as many documents and statements as we can.
Thank you the Embassy, and thank you George!
c. u.
Quite quickly, and although I took the medicals 45 days ago, the Embassy in Paris has accepted my request to add my de-facto spouse though I hadn't done it when I signed my application back in July 2001.
As George said, they simply asked for a handful of documents proving the grounds of a genuine relationship between us, and the famous fear "why did you declare you were not in a relationship in July?".
As we have answers to both problems, I think this affair should pass.
As always, a 49-day period is granted to allow us time to give as many documents and statements as we can.
Thank you the Embassy, and thank you George!
c. u.