Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Not before time why should the few support the greedy , but on a happy note there is a lot of empty rentals and the advice in WA right now is you can barter down rents because landlords are finding it hard to let.
IF YOU'RE one of the 1.3 million Australian taxpayers who owns an investment property, then your chances of being tapped on the shoulder by your friendly tax officer just went up.
The Australian Taxation Office has warned that this year it will be taking a much closer look at your rental income deductions, which totalled $13.1 billion in the past 12 months.
Over that same period, those 1.3 million taxpayers have returned rental income of $12.4 billion from their properties - meaning deductions have overtaken income to the tune of $700,000.
IF YOU'RE one of the 1.3 million Australian taxpayers who owns an investment property, then your chances of being tapped on the shoulder by your friendly tax officer just went up.
The Australian Taxation Office has warned that this year it will be taking a much closer look at your rental income deductions, which totalled $13.1 billion in the past 12 months.
Over that same period, those 1.3 million taxpayers have returned rental income of $12.4 billion from their properties - meaning deductions have overtaken income to the tune of $700,000.
#2
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,576
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by pommie bastard
The Australian Taxation Office has warned that this year it will be taking a much closer look at your rental income deductions, which totalled $13.1 billion in the past 12 months.
Over that same period, those 1.3 million taxpayers have returned rental income of $12.4 billion from their properties - meaning deductions have overtaken income to the tune of $700,000.
The Australian Taxation Office has warned that this year it will be taking a much closer look at your rental income deductions, which totalled $13.1 billion in the past 12 months.
Over that same period, those 1.3 million taxpayers have returned rental income of $12.4 billion from their properties - meaning deductions have overtaken income to the tune of $700,000.
Go back to your pokies PB.
#3
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
Well for your information if deductions weren't greater than income I'd be very surprised. The thing you don't realise is that depreciations that you claim are quite often greater than the mortagage payments, and so you don't understand the system to best advantage if you ever pay tax on the rental income.
Go back to your pokies PB.
Well for your information if deductions weren't greater than income I'd be very surprised. The thing you don't realise is that depreciations that you claim are quite often greater than the mortagage payments, and so you don't understand the system to best advantage if you ever pay tax on the rental income.
Go back to your pokies PB.
By the way the information is from the tax office , do all failed goverment workers have such a limited life?
Last edited by pommie bastard; Jul 2nd 2003 at 12:16 am.
#4
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,576
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by pommie bastard
You are so un-informed its untrue have heard of positive gearing?
By the way the information is from the tax office.
You are so un-informed its untrue have heard of positive gearing?
By the way the information is from the tax office.
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
Sure a positive geared house is fine, but unless you depreciate as well the positve part of the income is taxed at your highest rate, depreciate and positive income is effectively tax free. People who don't use depreciation are missing out on the greatest advantage of houses overs stocks and bonds.
Sure a positive geared house is fine, but unless you depreciate as well the positve part of the income is taxed at your highest rate, depreciate and positive income is effectively tax free. People who don't use depreciation are missing out on the greatest advantage of houses overs stocks and bonds.
The mad rush into homes will result in an over supply of homes and a down turn.
#6
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,576
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by pommie bastard
Franked stocks out perform all rentals on tax advantages , no tentant to reck the value of your investment or maintance costs .
The mad rush into homes will result in an over supply of homes and a down turn.
Franked stocks out perform all rentals on tax advantages , no tentant to reck the value of your investment or maintance costs .
The mad rush into homes will result in an over supply of homes and a down turn.
Stocks and shares can crash as eaisily as houses or haven't you been watching the stock market over the last 3 years.
Both have their advantages one is not best, a balanced portfolio is required to cover all eventualities.
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Re: Taxman turns up rent-claim heat
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
On a $200,000 house you should be able to claim $10,000 depreciation per year. I doubt that you would get $10,000 franked div on $200,000 of stock, plus banks would demand a higher deposit and higher interest rates to enable you to buy $200,000 of stock.
Stocks and shares can crash as eaisily as houses or haven't you been watching the stock market over the last 3 years.
Both have their advantages one is not best, a balanced portfolio is required to cover all eventualities.
On a $200,000 house you should be able to claim $10,000 depreciation per year. I doubt that you would get $10,000 franked div on $200,000 of stock, plus banks would demand a higher deposit and higher interest rates to enable you to buy $200,000 of stock.
Stocks and shares can crash as eaisily as houses or haven't you been watching the stock market over the last 3 years.
Both have their advantages one is not best, a balanced portfolio is required to cover all eventualities.
Borrow on Mortgage for Stocks no differance on rate , you are correct all eggs in one basket is not good so bugger buying more than one home.
#9
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Originally posted by The Tooth Fairy
This is the way the big boom ends
This is the way the big boom ends
Quote from your link.
I can feel another round of terrible publicity for the banks coming on.
And if all the media angst were to put the frighteners on a lot of owner-occupiers with big mortgages, the Howard Government's reputation as incomparable economic managers might be looking pretty tarnished.
If so, it would have only itself to blame. Why? Because it left open the negative-gearing loophole on which this whole rocky edifice has been built. And then it compounded its failure by halving the tax on capital gains. I call that asking for a property boom.
#10
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,576
Originally posted by The Tooth Fairy
This is the way the big boom ends
This is the way the big boom ends
Houses are a good investment, inner city rental appartments which are over priced and over sold are not.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
Yes I agree but that article specifically targets inner city appartments, and I've seen no one on this site advocating buying inner city appartments.
Houses are a good investment, inner city rental appartments which are over priced and over sold are not.
Yes I agree but that article specifically targets inner city appartments, and I've seen no one on this site advocating buying inner city appartments.
Houses are a good investment, inner city rental appartments which are over priced and over sold are not.
#12
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
Yes I agree but that article specifically targets inner city appartments, and I've seen no one on this site advocating buying inner city appartments.
Houses are a good investment, inner city rental appartments which are over priced and over sold are not.
Yes I agree but that article specifically targets inner city appartments, and I've seen no one on this site advocating buying inner city appartments.
Houses are a good investment, inner city rental appartments which are over priced and over sold are not.
#13
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Perth Arse end of the planet
Posts: 7,037
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
The number of years that the price of houses has fallen is trivial compared to the number of years the price of houses has risen, and no I don't have alink to prove it.
The main people affected by this are the speculators, not the average person comming out here to live.
The number of years that the price of houses has fallen is trivial compared to the number of years the price of houses has risen, and no I don't have alink to prove it.
The main people affected by this are the speculators, not the average person comming out here to live.
Ask yourself what if my investment is empty for 3 months of the year or more plus you get a problem tenant who recks the house and leaves owing a few bob.
#14
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,576
Originally posted by The Tooth Fairy
The connection is that some "investors" have mortgaged their home equity as deposits on inner city flats. A down turn in the price of flats could cause a down turn in suburban house prices. It could be appalling.
The connection is that some "investors" have mortgaged their home equity as deposits on inner city flats. A down turn in the price of flats could cause a down turn in suburban house prices. It could be appalling.
The main people affected by this are the speculators, not the average person comming out here to live.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Kiwipaul
The number of years that the price of houses has fallen is trivial compared to the number of years the price of houses has risen, and no I don't have alink to prove it.
The main people affected by this are the speculators, not the average person comming out here to live.
The number of years that the price of houses has fallen is trivial compared to the number of years the price of houses has risen, and no I don't have alink to prove it.
The main people affected by this are the speculators, not the average person comming out here to live.