![]() |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Bermudashorts
(Post 9265255)
Umm yes, if you were coming on holiday or transferring money then you are absolutely correct. But if you are talking about a salary then it is very stupid to assume that £81ksalary is equivalent to A$126k salary.
We currently have a historically low FX rate. If someone took an income at 1.56 x their UK salary they are going to really struggle because expenses are going to be a hell of a lot more than 1.56 times the GBP equivalent. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by laven
(Post 9265246)
I know:-)
So how is that people say 130k in Perth is 180k in London?? |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9265245)
It wasn't a dig, just a relection on the fact that $130k pa is a bloody good wage for most people.
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by laven
(Post 9265262)
Hell of a lot?? I just dont see that.. There is nothing to spend money on here:-)) beaches are still free:-)
I live in a house. I shop in the supermarket. My rent and my shopping is not 1.56 x the GBP cost. Far from it. Fortunately neither is my income so I have no problem myself, but if my income was 1.56 times my UK income then I feel sure I would be struggling. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9265263)
Eighty grand a year in the UK, anywhere in the UK, will be financially more comfortable than $130k here in Australia. If you want to dispute that, feel free. I don't think you will find many people backing you up.
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
I am with Bermudashorts on this one. I earn in the region of what the offer is in $ and would say that it is no where near what i would earn or the lifestyle i would have in the UK where i would earn about 80 pounds. The reason we are here is that i prefer the roster that is operated rather than long haul which we have done before. But i am increasing comming to the conclusion that it isnt worth it. Even though noew i work one week on and one week off and elsewhere in the world i would likely have to go back to 6 weeks on two weeks off.
You would be making a serious cut in lifestyle in rder to move to Australia. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Bermudashorts
(Post 9265272)
Do you live on the beach then? Do you find all your food on the beach?
I live in a house. I shop in the supermarket. My rent and my shopping is not 1.56 x the GBP cost. Far from it. Fortunately neither is my income so I have no problem myself, but if my income was 1.56 times my UK income then I feel sure I would be struggling. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by laven
(Post 9265258)
How do you find Perth after London? we are thinking to move Kent / Essex / Surrey for a few years.
I used to live in Woldingham, Surrey. It's a nice place - affluent, green, good prospects. The commuting sucks - SE England can be a rat race. The UK is not a country in which I would want to grow old in, or a place I would want to raise my son. All the reasons why we left the UK are still there - the only big difference now is that their economy is toast. I'm home |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by laven
(Post 9265275)
Do you have a bigger house in Australia than in UK? I live near a beach at the moment, but its temporary.
Three bedrooms, three bathrooms, living room, dining room and cinema room. Much the same. Both 45 minutes from the city (london and sydney). Why do you ask? Are you seriously trying to rationalise why an income of 1.56 x UK would be comparable. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by laven
(Post 9265273)
While Perth might be more expensive than London, its still not 30% more expensive.
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9265283)
Have you ever lived in the UK?
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 9265290)
It's not though. It might be more expensive (on a par IMO) but it's not 1/3 more
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9265294)
I never said it was, he did. All I did was use the 2.2 conversion that seems to be the rule on here when comparing salaries. If you convert at 1.56, the current FX rate, you will get screwed. Eight one grand x 2.2 is $178k
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9265294)
I never said it was, he did. All I did was use the 2.2 conversion that seems to be the rule on here when comparing salaries. If you convert at 1.56, the current FX rate, you will get screwed. Eight one grand x 2.2 is $178k
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 9265298)
He? I thought he was a she?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:10 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.