![]() |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Weebie
(Post 9268649)
There is nothing wrong with living in the outer burbs. Just be aware that the locals probably won't want anything to do with you if you choose to live out there.
With regards to the OP who is clearly a professional would he want this if he went to Perth? I doubt it. Vegemite and Amazulu I'm sure you are aware of this. Cheers I get on well with all my neighbours - some of whom are even 'professionals'. I find the people where I live to, generally, be very friendly A lot of people from the western suburbs can be really up themselves |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by verystormy
(Post 9268645)
This is a first i think, but i actually agree with Weebie on this one. I think if someone said my life was going to be spent in the sprawling burbs that are the foundation of Perth being known as Dullsville then i would rather slit my wrists with a rusty spoon.
I have never figured why anyone would move to the other side of the world to live in one of the big burbs. What was the point. Might as well have stayed in blighty and used all the money spent comming here on some extra holidays to sunny climes for the sunshine fix. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by verystormy
(Post 9268645)
This is a first i think, but i actually agree with Weebie on this one. I think if someone said my life was going to be spent in the sprawling burbs that are the foundation of Perth being known as Dullsville then i would rather slit my wrists with a rusty spoon.
I have never figured why anyone would move to the other side of the world to live in one of the big burbs. What was the point. Might as well have stayed in blighty and used all the money spent comming here on some extra holidays to sunny climes for the sunshine fix. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 9268653)
The 9000+ a month after tax sounds good, but OP has to remember thats only as long as they can claim LAFHA, once that is gone they will be looking at only 7000 approx a month.
With our kind of lifestyle, the years under 457 will be good. But as we can't risk extending more than 2 years staying under temporary visa, we'd have to move to PR, and so the LAFHA will be given up --- that's when we'll feel the big difference. He'd be going back to the employer with all his comments on the contract and we'd see how it would go. Thanks for the comments and I'd definitely give an update. Cheers, Ph-UK-(Au:fingerscrossed:) |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
I havent read the whole thread but my opinion would be that for 80K GBP I;d want 200K AUD
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 9268682)
. I don't think I could live in one of those cookie-cutter
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by EvannTel
(Post 9269443)
I havent read the whole thread but my opinion would be that for 80K GBP I;d want 200K AUD
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Opinions on architecture are obviously subjective, but I thought people called Perth dull because they thought there was nothing to do.
Surely ANY British town/city has its fair share of boring/ugly (again, subjective) housing. If having a proportion of boring/ugly housing is what makes a place dull then, in my opinion, London is pretty dull too. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Weebie
(Post 9268649)
There is nothing wrong with living in the outer burbs. Just be aware that the locals probably won't want anything to do with you if you choose to live out there.
With regards to the OP who is clearly a professional would he want this if he went to Perth? I doubt it. Vegemite and Amazulu I'm sure you are aware of this. Cheers BTW, I wouldn't like to move from 81k in the UK to $130K in Perth. Just my opinion. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by floss in dubai
(Post 9270756)
Jesus, we're not living in West Side Story, we're adults.
|
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by floss in dubai
(Post 9270756)
I find it sad that you have such a distorted/low view on Perth 'locals'. I'm a Perth local (kind of) and I don't live in the 'outer suburbs' but I have friends all over Perth. I'm heading out to Alexander Heights to visit our closest friends as we speak and I'm not an exception. Most people I know have friends from all over. Living in one area doesn't prohibit them from being friends. Jesus, we're not living in West Side Story, we're adults.
BTW, I wouldn't like to move from 81k in the UK to $130K in Perth. Just my opinion. Do agree though on your second point. No way would i move out here if on 81,000k in UK. Far better off staying there. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Family of 3
(Post 9270738)
Opinions on architecture are obviously subjective, but I thought people called Perth dull because they thought there was nothing to do.
Surely ANY British town/city has its fair share of boring/ugly (again, subjective) housing. If having a proportion of boring/ugly housing is what makes a place dull then, in my opinion, London is pretty dull too. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 9265190)
oh Tiger, oh Air Asia X........
recent fares for us: $700 return to London $250 return to Singapore $300 return to KL Tiger have advertised $1 fares to Melbourne this week By some intensive pikeying around on the internet I've just scored a $300 trip to KL from Coolangatta, two weeks in Borneo ($60 to Kota Kinabalu from KL) , fly from KL to Colombo in Sri Lanka ($88) 1 week Sri Lanka then Sri Lanka air to London 125 quid. It's all there if you are flexible and willing to rough it - but to be fair unless you take business class all flights are rubbish anyway. Last time I paid for extra leg room on Qantas I was mortified to discover I was sitting in the baby section - after 10 hours of screaming, puke, relentless cooing and a bottle of breast milk dripping on me I realise I'd rather have been taped to a wing. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
Originally Posted by the troubadour
(Post 9270945)
Dull is not the term i would use to describe London..not in same way folk use that word to describe Perth,at any rate.
Me neither. But I don't think Perth's dull either. But people were saying Perth's known as Dullsville because some of the housing is a bit boring. My point was that some of the housing is a bit boring in most places, including London. |
Re: Should we still consider moving to Perth?
I'm with the againsts. I think $130k from £80K in the UK would be a considerable drop in living standard. It might be a decent wage for Australia but people generally are not happy when their life style takes a step downhill. Check out the price of shopping, decent cars, house prices and it sticks out a mile that you would need 2.2 to 2.5 times to equate to a similar standard of living. Beaches, sun and sea are nice, I agree, but they soon lose their 'must have' appeal and I, for one, would swap them for some culture, pubs with atmosphere, decent food and shopping any day of the week. Why not take a sabbatical year and travel around. That probably would have been plenty for us but we're committed for at least another 12 months...
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:45 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.