![]() |
Qantas
I always liked Qantas, but I have to say the impression I get as an uninformed consumer is I don't want to fly with them right now.
I saw the chief of their pilots association on TV the other week basically saying "corners are being cut on maintenance" it was a really surprising interview. I've been looking at flights back from the UK after Christmas and find myself avoiding Qantas flights, including codeshares with BA etc. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008153)
I always liked Quantas, but I have to say the impression I get as an uninformed consumer is I don't want to fly with them right now.
I saw the chief of their pilots association on TV the other week basically saying "corners are being cut on maintenance" it was a really surprising interview. I've been looking at flights back from the UK after Christmas and find myself avoiding Quantas flights, including codeshares with BA etc. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008153)
I always liked Quantas, but I have to say the impression I get as an uninformed consumer is I don't want to fly with them right now.
I saw the chief of their pilots association on TV the other week basically saying "corners are being cut on maintenance" it was a really surprising interview. I've been looking at flights back from the UK after Christmas and find myself avoiding Quantas flights, including codeshares with BA etc. Come off it mate. The Pilots Association is affiliated with the union (ACTU) which wages a campaign via the low brow media to make sure we all know only Australians are capable of maintaining aircraft properly. No doubt the Australian engineers are 'the best in the world'. I'd have no worries flying Qantas, save for the fact I think they're often pretty ordinary. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by iamthecreaturefromuranus
(Post 9008159)
It's QANTAS.... Queensland and Northern Territories Airline Service :)
Now who's splitting hairs ;) P.S. It was Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial (not airline) Services P.P.S. Edited and fixed the spelling error, dunno what I was thinking |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 9008172)
Quantas? You couldn't have liked them that much! :p
Come off it mate. The Pilots Association is affiliated with the union (ACTU) which wages a campaign via the low brow media to make sure we all know only Australians are capable of maintaining aircraft properly. No doubt the Australian engineers are 'the best in the world'. I'd have no worries flying Qantas, save for the fact I think they're often pretty ordinary. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by bcworld
(Post 9008172)
Quantas? You couldn't have liked them that much! :p
Come off it mate. The Pilots Association is affiliated with the union (ACTU) which wages a campaign via the low brow media to make sure we all know only Australians are capable of maintaining aircraft properly. No doubt the Australian engineers are 'the best in the world'. I'd have no worries flying Qantas, save for the fact I think they're often pretty ordinary. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008197)
Fair point, but I work in an industry where outsourcing is the norm, and have personal experience that offshore workers are not always up to scratch.
|
Re: Qantas
I'd rather fly Qantas than BA anyday, go out of my way to avoid BA sectors, their customer service is kak. Qantas maintenance is no worse than most other major airlines, and a lot better than many. And lets face it, you're more likely to die crossing a road than an an aircraft crash.
|
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by Pollyana
(Post 9008204)
I'd rather fly Qantas than BA anyday, go out of my way to avoid BA sectors, their customer service is kak. Qantas maintenance is no worse than most other major airlines, and a lot better than many. And lets face it, you're more likely to die crossing a road than an an aircraft crash.
|
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008220)
For all of the above, as a dumb consumer my initial point was only that Qantas have a bit of a PR disaster going on here, whatever the cause.
|
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008220)
For all of the above, as a dumb consumer my initial point was only that Qantas have a bit of a PR disaster going on here, whatever the cause.
|
Re: Qantas
I'm flying to LA with qantas on saturday!! As long as they have any issues sorted out by then i'll be happy :thumbsup:
|
Re: Qantas
Originally Posted by Pollyana
(Post 9008204)
I'd rather fly Qantas than BA anyday, go out of my way to avoid BA sectors, their customer service is kak. Qantas maintenance is no worse than most other major airlines, and a lot better than many. And lets face it, you're more likely to die crossing a road than an an aircraft crash.
|
Re: Qantas
It's surely impossible for any global airline to claim '100% of maintenance is performed onshore' -because what happens if the plane brakes down when it's abroad? Can't always fly it home to get the spanners out.
The QANTAS CEO bloke said it best "Singapore Airlines do 100% of their maintenace offshore and no one has ever questioned their safety record". I stopped flying BA on the kangaroo route after the quality of the onboard food when through the floor, out of the £1100 I spent on my peak season ticket only £3-4 was re-invested in feeding me. |
Re: Quantas
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 9008220)
For all of the above, as a dumb consumer my initial point was only that Qantas have a bit of a PR disaster going on here, whatever the cause.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:34 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.