Puzzler?????
#1
Puzzler?????
3 men have a meal in a resturant, the bill comes to £30.
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
#3
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,360
Re: Puzzler?????
I cant concentrate on this, I keep laughing at your avator!
#5
Account Closed
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 671
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by pompeywill
3 men have a meal in a resturant, the bill comes to £30.
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
Had me and the missus sat here scratching our head for the last 10 minutes.....put us out of our misery peerrrleeease!
Ya Git!!
#6
Bit more than Jnr. Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 35
Re: Puzzler?????
Okay, so there were thirty pounds in cash originally received by the waiter. At the end of the transaction, the total amount of cash in the "system" (25 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1) still adds up to thirty, so there is no missing pound. In other words, all the different chunks of money add up to the original total of thirty pounds.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total. The waiter had £2"
However, the two pounds that the waiter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the guys have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the guys' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the guys had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and the waiter had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
The guys' bill comes to 40 pounds
Waiter takes 15 pounds back
and keeps 2 pounds, gives the guys 13
Net result: The guys have paid 27 pounds, waiter keeps 2, sum 29.
Where's the other 11?
In other words, by choosing the numbers properly, you can make arbitrary amounts of money "go missing", because the underlying line of reasoning is completely wrong.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total. The waiter had £2"
However, the two pounds that the waiter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the guys have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the guys' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the guys had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and the waiter had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
The guys' bill comes to 40 pounds
Waiter takes 15 pounds back
and keeps 2 pounds, gives the guys 13
Net result: The guys have paid 27 pounds, waiter keeps 2, sum 29.
Where's the other 11?
In other words, by choosing the numbers properly, you can make arbitrary amounts of money "go missing", because the underlying line of reasoning is completely wrong.
#7
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by pompeywill
3 men have a meal in a resturant, the bill comes to £30.
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
£25 divided by 3 = they each paid £8.33
given back a pound = they each paid £9.33
£9.33 x 3 = £28
plus the waiters £2 = £30!!!
ok so I'm a smart a***
#8
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by alneve2oz
Okay, so there were thirty pounds in cash originally received by the waiter. At the end of the transaction, the total amount of cash in the "system" (25 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1) still adds up to thirty, so there is no missing pound. In other words, all the different chunks of money add up to the original total of thirty pounds.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total. The waiter had £2"
However, the two pounds that the waiter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the guys have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the guys' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the guys had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and the waiter had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
The guys' bill comes to 40 pounds
Waiter takes 15 pounds back
and keeps 2 pounds, gives the guys 13
Net result: The guys have paid 27 pounds, waiter keeps 2, sum 29.
Where's the other 11?
In other words, by choosing the numbers properly, you can make arbitrary amounts of money "go missing", because the underlying line of reasoning is completely wrong.
The fallacious missing pound creeps in when you start adding up the same money more than once.
In the story, it says that "So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total. The waiter had £2"
However, the two pounds that the waiter has kept is part of the 27 pounds the guys have paid - it is not different money, so it can't be added to the guys' 27 pounds. You're counting it twice.
The fact that this meaningless value adds up to one less than thirty, which causes the "missing pound", is pure coincidence. If the guys had overpaid by fifteen pounds rather than five, and the waiter had still kept two pounds, then by this argument you would now have eleven missing pounds:
The guys' bill comes to 40 pounds
Waiter takes 15 pounds back
and keeps 2 pounds, gives the guys 13
Net result: The guys have paid 27 pounds, waiter keeps 2, sum 29.
Where's the other 11?
In other words, by choosing the numbers properly, you can make arbitrary amounts of money "go missing", because the underlying line of reasoning is completely wrong.
#9
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by pompeywill
3 men have a meal in a resturant, the bill comes to £30.
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
They each pay £10.
The waiter goes to the till and realises they have been over charged, the meal was only £25.
So the waiter takes out £5, puts £2 in his pocket and gives back the men a pound each.
With me so far?
So the men each paid £9, thats £27 in total.
The waiter had £2.
Where's the other pound?
If you actually said the men paid 30 had 3 refunded - total 27, the fact the waiter had change from 5 in his pocket has nothing to do with it.
Cheers
#10
Bit more than Jnr. Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 35
Re: Puzzler?????
Sorry, that was a rather convoluted (if eloquent and loquatious) answer. Simply put:
It cost 25 quid + 2 quid tip = 27
They paid 30 quid
They got 3 quid back
i.e. There's a difference between money in your pocket, and hypothetical money in sums.
AJ.
It cost 25 quid + 2 quid tip = 27
They paid 30 quid
They got 3 quid back
i.e. There's a difference between money in your pocket, and hypothetical money in sums.
AJ.
#12
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,360
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by louise4
and another
oh good, it wasnt just me then!
#13
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by alneve2oz
Sorry, that was a rather convoluted (if eloquent and loquatious) answer. Simply put:
It cost 25 quid + 2 quid tip = 27
They paid 30 quid
They got 3 quid back
i.e. There's a difference between money in your pocket, and hypothetical money in sums.
AJ.
It cost 25 quid + 2 quid tip = 27
They paid 30 quid
They got 3 quid back
i.e. There's a difference between money in your pocket, and hypothetical money in sums.
AJ.
#14
Re: Puzzler?????
Maths never was my strong point. mind you saying that i think all my points are a bit blunt
#15
Bit more than Jnr. Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 35
Re: Puzzler?????
Originally Posted by Pootle
£25 divided by 3 = they each paid £8.33
given back a pound = they each paid £9.33
£9.33 x 3 = £28
plus the waiters £2 = £30!!!
ok so I'm a smart a***
given back a pound = they each paid £9.33
£9.33 x 3 = £28
plus the waiters £2 = £30!!!
ok so I'm a smart a***
Well, not quite a smar a***, as that would total £29.99 in which case with your "logic" there's still a penny "missing". The problem is that the guys didn't pay £9.33, they paid £9 1/3 - not much of a difference.