Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
Mar 29th 2010, 4:24 am
#62
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 203
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
I think they should sell top loaders in shops or over the internet etc. In my experience the cost of ownership is about the same as a front loader because top loaders last longer and give fewer problems.
Mar 29th 2010, 4:26 am
#63
Proudly Deplorable
Joined: May 2003
Location: Alloha snack bar
Posts: 24,246
Mar 29th 2010, 4:38 am
#64
Account Closed
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 153
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
Please don't claim to be one of my descendants with out proof positive, preferably genetic from a reputable laboratory.
I think they should sell top loaders in shops or over the internet etc. In my experience the cost of ownership is about the same as a front loader because top loaders last longer and give fewer problems.
I think they should sell top loaders in shops or over the internet etc. In my experience the cost of ownership is about the same as a front loader because top loaders last longer and give fewer problems.
Mar 29th 2010, 4:39 am
#65
Mostly Harmless
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Semi-rural wonderworld, Brisbane
Posts: 15,109
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
I am against top loading, there should be an even spread, give everyone a chance I say. 
The stuff you learn ... http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...term=toploader
The stuff you learn ... http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...term=toploader
Last edited by DeadVim; Mar 29th 2010 at 4:43 am.
Mar 29th 2010, 5:20 am
#67
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,526
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
We do the shopping together. My wife is more brand driven while I'm more inclined to be value / functionally driven and therefore more willing to trial products.
Thanks for the info. Would you be so kind as to extend your comparison to cost per wash?
I imagine that the amount recommended depends on the type of machine in which it will be used. Typically top loaders like mine require twice the detergent compared to a front loader. In other words, half the recommended dose of the Woolies product might work well in front loaders. Something to try at a very low cost?
Thanks for the info. Would you be so kind as to extend your comparison to cost per wash?
I imagine that the amount recommended depends on the type of machine in which it will be used. Typically top loaders like mine require twice the detergent compared to a front loader. In other words, half the recommended dose of the Woolies product might work well in front loaders. Something to try at a very low cost?
I like this thread, it's cheered me up a bit, things are not as out of kilter as I thought.
In fact it's done this for me... (just to show how far a thread can actually go ff topic
)How much is a nice female Cockney accent combined with 'tude worth.... Priceless dammit. Didnt realise how much I missed it till this came along. Hope my Daughter comes back with a trace of one.
Oh will I can smile now I realise that prices aint that bad.
Mar 29th 2010, 5:29 am
#68
Banned
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,733
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
I like this thread, it's cheered me up a bit, things are not as out of kilter as I thought.
In fact it's done this for me... (just to show how far a thread can actually go ff topic )
How much is a nice female Cockney accent combined with 'tude worth.... Priceless dammit. Didnt realise how much I missed it till this came along. Hope my Daughter comes back with a trace of one.
Oh will I can smile now I realise that prices aint that bad.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0WxDrVUrSvI
In fact it's done this for me... (just to show how far a thread can actually go ff topic
)How much is a nice female Cockney accent combined with 'tude worth.... Priceless dammit. Didnt realise how much I missed it till this came along. Hope my Daughter comes back with a trace of one.
Oh will I can smile now I realise that prices aint that bad.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0WxDrVUrSvI
Mar 29th 2010, 5:45 am
#69
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 203
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
Getting her jollies by paying to have her boyfriend assaulted, his possessions damaged and slipping laxatives into his drink.
You strike me as a very silly boy and her as malicious. Probably conditions arrived at through poor, perhaps self-harming, shopping habits.
You strike me as a very silly boy and her as malicious. Probably conditions arrived at through poor, perhaps self-harming, shopping habits.
Last edited by AllGoode; Mar 29th 2010 at 5:49 am.
Mar 29th 2010, 6:29 am
#73
Account Closed
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 153
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
I like this thread, it's cheered me up a bit, things are not as out of kilter as I thought.
In fact it's done this for me... (just to show how far a thread can actually go ff topic )
How much is a nice female Cockney accent combined with 'tude worth.... Priceless dammit. Didnt realise how much I missed it till this came along. Hope my Daughter comes back with a trace of one.
Oh will I can smile now I realise that prices aint that bad.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0WxDrVUrSvI
In fact it's done this for me... (just to show how far a thread can actually go ff topic
)How much is a nice female Cockney accent combined with 'tude worth.... Priceless dammit. Didnt realise how much I missed it till this came along. Hope my Daughter comes back with a trace of one.
Oh will I can smile now I realise that prices aint that bad.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0WxDrVUrSvI
What a bad example to set to people. It's just idiotic. Can't stand that over-rated whining female either.
Mar 29th 2010, 6:47 am
#75
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,526
Re: Not so expensive? (grocery comparison)
Now a feeble attempt to get the thread back on target.
I wonder where was cheaper in 66 Aus or the UK ?