Not in our cities
#1
Not in our cities
I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)
JTL
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
Among the measures that could be considered by Immigration Minister Chris Evans is a proposal to force at least 45 per cent of migrants to reside in areas with a population below 350,000.
JTL
#2
Re: Not in our cities
I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)
JTL
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)
JTL
#3
Re: Not in our cities
I don't mean to hijack my own thread, but I only discovered last week that BHP Billiton, originaly stood for Broken Hill Proprietary , and then they bought Billiton.
Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.
He would be dead as well obviously.
JTL
Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.
He would be dead as well obviously.
JTL
#4
Re: Not in our cities
I don't mean to hijack my own thread, but I only discovered last week that BHP Billiton, originaly stood for Broken Hill Proprietary , and then they bought Billiton.
Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.
He would be dead as well obviously.
JTL
Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.
He would be dead as well obviously.
JTL
#5
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808
Re: Not in our cities
Actually all QLD cities with the exception of the Gold Coast, Brisbane & Sunshine Coast have a population of less than 350,000.
As sad as it is, for a lot of the Brisbanites that I have to deal with, the Pine River bridge is the edge of their known world......
WW
As sad as it is, for a lot of the Brisbanites that I have to deal with, the Pine River bridge is the edge of their known world......
WW
#6
Australia's Doorman
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: The Shoalhaven, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 11,056
Re: Not in our cities
Sounds like an excellent idea to me.
#7
Re: Not in our cities
Tis something I've commented on a few times.
With the major cities bulging at the seams it has to happen sometime.
It's logical.
It's sensible.
But the government will have to be proactive in enticing businesses to "spread".
With the major cities bulging at the seams it has to happen sometime.
It's logical.
It's sensible.
But the government will have to be proactive in enticing businesses to "spread".
#8
Re: Not in our cities
I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)
JTL
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)
JTL
interfering in peoples lives.
Let migrants live where they want - if they don't then migrants will go elsewhere. Encouage business to move to these areas. If they pay well enough, people will move there.
#9
Re: Not in our cities
What is ridiculous is allowing the major cities to grow out of all proportion to the environments they are set in.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.
We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.
We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
#10
Re: Not in our cities
What is ridiculous is allowing the major cities to grow out of all proportion to the environments they are set in.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.
We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.
We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
People will live where they want to live, despite what the government might think.
#13
Re: Not in our cities
I would not accept the government telling me where to live - migrant or not. Would you? Agree that the infrastructure needs to be in place to allow increase on population - Australia is a rich country and can afford to do this.
People will live where they want to live, despite what the government might think.
People will live where they want to live, despite what the government might think.
That being the case, you either accept the visa conditions or don't bother moving.