Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia
Reload this Page >

Not in our cities

Not in our cities

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 29th 2008, 12:56 pm
  #1  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
JackTheLad's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Birkdale QLD
Posts: 7,642
JackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond repute
Default Not in our cities

I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html

Among the measures that could be considered by Immigration Minister Chris Evans is a proposal to force at least 45 per cent of migrants to reside in areas with a population below 350,000.
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)

JTL
JackTheLad is offline  
Old Feb 29th 2008, 12:58 pm
  #2  
Take it easy
 
Shakmaty's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,182
Shakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by JackTheLad
I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html



So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)

JTL
That'd be a handy workforce for the Uranium mine in Broken Hill
Shakmaty is offline  
Old Feb 29th 2008, 1:07 pm
  #3  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
JackTheLad's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Birkdale QLD
Posts: 7,642
JackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond reputeJackTheLad has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by Shakmaty
That'd be a handy workforce for the Uranium mine in Broken Hill
I don't mean to hijack my own thread, but I only discovered last week that BHP Billiton, originaly stood for Broken Hill Proprietary , and then they bought Billiton.

Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.

He would be dead as well obviously.

JTL
JackTheLad is offline  
Old Feb 29th 2008, 1:09 pm
  #4  
Take it easy
 
Shakmaty's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,182
Shakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by JackTheLad
I don't mean to hijack my own thread, but I only discovered last week that BHP Billiton, originaly stood for Broken Hill Proprietary , and then they bought Billiton.

Some poor guy bought a 1/6 share in Broken Hill back in the 1890s, for 40 pounds, and watched it go up to 60 pounds, and sold it for the handsome profit of 20 pounds in a few months. Apparently , if he had held on to his share it would be worth billions of pounds now.

He would be dead as well obviously.

JTL
Hindsight is a great thing, but if you've ever been to Broken Hill you probably know why he thought making 20 pounds was a good thing
Shakmaty is offline  
Old Feb 29th 2008, 9:22 pm
  #5  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,808
wanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to beholdwanderingwombat is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by JackTheLad
So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)

JTL
Actually all QLD cities with the exception of the Gold Coast, Brisbane & Sunshine Coast have a population of less than 350,000.

As sad as it is, for a lot of the Brisbanites that I have to deal with, the Pine River bridge is the edge of their known world......

WW
wanderingwombat is offline  
Old Feb 29th 2008, 10:16 pm
  #6  
Australia's Doorman
 
Hutch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: The Shoalhaven, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 11,056
Hutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond reputeHutch has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Sounds like an excellent idea to me.
Hutch is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 2:22 am
  #7  
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Bix's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Lion in da jungle
Posts: 22,767
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by Hutch
Sounds like an excellent idea to me.
Tis something I've commented on a few times.

With the major cities bulging at the seams it has to happen sometime.

It's logical.
It's sensible.

But the government will have to be proactive in enticing businesses to "spread".
Bix is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 2:31 am
  #8  
Proudly Deplorable
 
Amazulu's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Alloha snack bar
Posts: 24,246
Amazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by JackTheLad
I don't know if any of you have seen the latest aussie government idea

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...56-952,00.html



So watch out Mount Isa, Towoomba, Geelong, and Cairns(?)

JTL
It's a ridiculous idea - typical socialist bullshit of government over-
interfering in peoples lives.

Let migrants live where they want - if they don't then migrants will go elsewhere. Encouage business to move to these areas. If they pay well enough, people will move there.
Amazulu is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 3:06 am
  #9  
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Bix's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Lion in da jungle
Posts: 22,767
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

What is ridiculous is allowing the major cities to grow out of all proportion to the environments they are set in.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.

We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
Bix is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 3:26 am
  #10  
Proudly Deplorable
 
Amazulu's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Alloha snack bar
Posts: 24,246
Amazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond reputeAmazulu has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by Bix
What is ridiculous is allowing the major cities to grow out of all proportion to the environments they are set in.
It's creating concentrations of the population that is not sustainable. Infrastructure will not cope.
Farther down the road that could manifest in civil disrest.

We agree the prime factor is location of business, but I don't see why immigration policy shouldn't work hand in hand with that to help it along.
I would not accept the government telling me where to live - migrant or not. Would you? Agree that the infrastructure needs to be in place to allow increase on population - Australia is a rich country and can afford to do this.

People will live where they want to live, despite what the government might think.
Amazulu is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 3:45 am
  #11  
What's happening dudes?
 
wmoore's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Bayside Brisbane
Posts: 20,647
wmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by JackTheLad
I don't mean to hijack my own thread, but ......
Originally Posted by Bix
It's logical.
It's sensible..
Which means there's no danger of any government implementing it
wmoore is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 4:08 am
  #12  
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Bix's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Lion in da jungle
Posts: 22,767
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by Amazulu
I would not accept the government telling me where to live - migrant or not. Would you?
Yes, I already did
Bix is offline  
Old Mar 1st 2008, 4:18 am
  #13  
What's happening dudes?
 
wmoore's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Bayside Brisbane
Posts: 20,647
wmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond reputewmoore has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Not in our cities

Originally Posted by Amazulu
I would not accept the government telling me where to live - migrant or not. Would you? Agree that the infrastructure needs to be in place to allow increase on population - Australia is a rich country and can afford to do this.

People will live where they want to live, despite what the government might think.
I'm sure it wouldn't be a case of seeing people right through the visa process and then DIAC says "oh and by the way, you have to live in Woop Woop". It will be part of the process and I'm sure that these 'regional' visas will target those wannabe immigrants who don't make the points tally for Skilled Independent, as happens now.

That being the case, you either accept the visa conditions or don't bother moving.
wmoore is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.