chippy

Tum tee tum. This really is getting tedious. As has been pointed out by Slater, myself and other members of the klan, we really don't have a problem with other peoples, cultures, religions etc...multi-cultures; no problem. In fact its a good thing.

The problems are only associated with illegals, villians and spongers.

Try straightening up your village idiot reading glasses, and see if you can by yourself some comprehesion pills.

rajj

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slater
our lawers (mostly named khan) get onto their cases, and effectively milk the system. Forget all other expenses, I would like a Government figure on what the legal bill is. It would not surpise me if the same Asian lawers who are making millions out of our system are not paying to bring more of these people here just to represent them!!!!!!!


During the five years I spent working for the Legal Services Commission in London, I can assure you that 95% or more of the blood sucking lawer bas**** we paid for such cases were called messers 'Windass, Jones, Smith, Baxter and a thousand other non asian lawyer scumbags. You claim not to be racist, inwhich case you are talking out of your ass with the above comment.

I await the usual abuse from the Dail Mail readers.

pommie bastard

You have summed why Australia should not except any more Poms after all the place is full of low lifes as you have explained.

jayr

So you are going to be an immigrant to a country and hadn't given any consideration to integrating with the indigenous population. Presumably you'll also push them to the back of the queue for housing, mobile phones, transport, education etc.?

SteveBannister

Quite right, Slater.

Once they're here, you can't even pay them to go back. Makes me think that they're not just here for genuine asylum after all. Could we possibly have been right all along? Is it possible the PB, Wilf and the like were wrong........

asylum (plural asylums) (n)
1. shelter and protection: protection or safety from danger or imminent harm provided by a sheltered place until safety can be assured.




DAVID Blunkett’s plan to ‘bribe’ Afghan and Iraqi asy-lum seekers to go home with free plane tickets and grants is proving a costly fiasco.
The Home Office hoped thou-sands would accept payments of up to £2,500 per family to return and rebuild their coun-tries following the toppling of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. But of the 26,000 Afghans who arrived in Britain seeking refuge in recent years only 40 have taken up the Government’s offer. The take-up rate has now dwin-dled virtually to nothing, with only one Afghan applying for the scheme in the past four months.
Hopes that large numbers of Iraqis would want to return home under a similar scheme appear equally misguided, with only eight volunteers boarding the first flight last month — out of some 50,000 Iraqi asylum seekers. Ministers hoped that paying asylum seekers to go home would prove cheaper in the long run than supporting them in the UK, processing their claims and then deporting them. The failure of Mr. Blunkett’s strat-egy is likely to cost taxpayers m-illions of pounds as the Home Office will have to resort to compulsory removals — with the expense of charter flights, security staff, legal costs and detaining deportees. Last month the government spent £130,000, flying 47 failed asylum seekers to Kabul with only a fraction of the seats on the chartered airline occupied. Fewer than 200 Afghans have been sent home in the last four months and one flight enduring was cancelled after only six could be rounded up. At the current rate it would take more than 30 years to send home all Afghans were failed to gain permanent asylum. The cash offer was launched last summer with Home Office grant of £600 per individual and £2,500 for families returning to Afghanistan. But the overwhelming majority apparently prefers their lives in Britain, including many whom work illegally or live on benefits. Only a fraction of the 26,000 Afghans were sought asylum here over the past decade have been judged to be genuine refugees. But until April, nobody had been deported there for years, because the country was so unstable. Iraqi asylum seekers are being offered free flights home and £100 worth of help-in-kind from charities working in Iraq. But despite the war to topple Saddam, virtually no Iraqis in Britain have volunteered to return. The first flight organised by the Home Office last month carried only eight. As with Afghanistan, David Blunkett has threatened to start deportations to Iraq within weeks. A major problem with the voluntary return schemes is that many asylum seekers pay trafficking gangs thousands of pounds in order to reach Britain. Far more than the cash grants.

Wilf

Are you a south african?

SteveBannister

No.

pommie bastard

The wider you open your stupid mouth the farther your foot goes in , never learn do you , I hope Australia lets you in for its their loss and Great Britains gain.

The Australian government is now offering financial inducements to the Afghans held on Nauru whose asylum claims have been rejected, to accept its repatriation package and to return home voluntarily. On 23 May 2002, Minister Philip Ruddock announced details of a funding package available to Afghan asylum seekers who voluntarily return to Afghanistan, following the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Afghanistan Interim Government in Kabul on 16 May 2002. [59]

http://www.caa.org.au/campaigns/refu...ng/return.html

mr mover

we will let a couple more in when you Bugga off, if you ever do....... MM

SteveBannister

Proves my point then doesn't it. Surely ligitimate asylum seekers would want to return home afterwards.

Oh no, you don't think some where lying, do you?

pommie bastard

No you seem to think that an immo's and a refugee are different in what they are looking for , both want a better life and to live in a safe country .
Whether a country like Australia who want immos should be forced to except refugees above immos is a matter that UN should enforce right now .
The immos are coming from safe countries with living standards on a Par so why not put them at the bottom of the list and fast tract refugees who in most cases have skills not that far away from Hairdressers/Brickies and the like?