Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia
Reload this Page >

IR Law Reforms High Court Challenge Latest Update

IR Law Reforms High Court Challenge Latest Update

Old May 10th 2006, 9:19 am
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,551
kiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond reputekiwichild has a reputation beyond repute
Default IR Law Reforms High Court Challenge Latest Update

Govt 'seeks IR powers through courts'
Wednesday May 10 19:05 AEST
A High Court judge says the federal government is asking the court to give it power to intervene in state industrial relations because previous governments have failed to get it in four referendums.

The government is continuing its defence of its WorkChoices laws, which came into effect on March 27, and which are under High Court challenge by unions and the states.

The central issue is whether the commonwealth has the right to use the corporations power in the Constitution to make laws to intervene in the states' industrial relations.

Justice Ian Callinan said that the Commonwealth was seeking to get the High Court to give it power over the state's industrial relations because there had been four unsuccessful referendums on the subject since federation.




"What you're really saying is it's very hard to get it changed so you want the court to do it," Justice Ian Callinan said.

But counsel for the federal government, Commonwealth Solicitor-General David Bennett QC, said the High Court could not take into account the fact that four referendums on the question of giving the Commonwealth power over state industrial relations had failed.

"The fact that the electorate at a particular time had a majority to get that result does not say anything to this court about what to do," he said.

Mr Bennett also said the federal government taking more power from the states was the local effect of globalisation.

"That is part of ... a local aspect of globalisation," he told the court.

But Justice Michael Kirby said power was divided between the Commonwealth and the states at federation in order to provide checks and balances.

"They divide power for that very important protection of liberty," he said.

The New South Wales, West Australian, South Australian, Queensland and Victorian governments, as well as Unions NSW and the Australian Workers Union have all challenged the WorkChoices laws in the High Court.

The Tasmanian, Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory governments have made contributions to the case.

The hearing continues on Thursday.

Courtesy: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=93222
kiwichild is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.