Hospitalisation costs ????
#16
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Dream life UK....
Posts: 2,912
Originally posted by ABCDiamond
Is Private Medical insurance worth it ?
If it costs $2,000 per year, and you don't claim anything for 5 years, then surely you are better off by $10,000 ?
Can anyone explain why I should go with Private care ?
Is Private Medical insurance worth it ?
If it costs $2,000 per year, and you don't claim anything for 5 years, then surely you are better off by $10,000 ?
Can anyone explain why I should go with Private care ?
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
#17
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Originally posted by dotty
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
I wonder where everyone thinks all these dollars are going to come from?
#18
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Dream life UK....
Posts: 2,912
Originally posted by dotty
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
#19
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Dream life UK....
Posts: 2,912
Originally posted by bondipom
Healthcare costs a lot of money. Get used to it. In the UK people are going overseas for straight forward operations so they do not have to wait. They are paying for it out of pocket.
I wonder where everyone thinks all these dollars are going to come from?
Healthcare costs a lot of money. Get used to it. In the UK people are going overseas for straight forward operations so they do not have to wait. They are paying for it out of pocket.
I wonder where everyone thinks all these dollars are going to come from?
A good start in many countries would be to tackle health issues at the root of the problem. Self responsibility. Look at most people these days, junk food diet, processed food. Very little exercise.
Take smoking alone, what would the health service save if smokes went up to $20.00 a pack. $10.00 of that going straight to the health service. Junk food tax, why not, its rubbish it kills us so why not tax it. Plus look at how many people here get subsidised prescriptions but can afford $115 for a carton of fags.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by dotty
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
Rules that twisted the arms of many a high income earner I believe Then the premiums started to go up, funny that
I agree thats it good for some people, I do know someone who gets back,in benefits, about 150% of what they pay almost every year.
#21
Originally posted by dotty
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
For us if we did not take out private health insurance, we would have had to pay some extra (tax) penalty for not having it. Its to do with High income earners. Think its $50,000 for a single, $100,000 for a family. Not very high really.
Plus theres another penalty for not taking it out, if you dont take it out by a certain age, the premiums start to 'load' when you eventually do.
So you just have to find a basic hospital cover that's going to cost less than $1000 a year (1% of 100,000) and you're in front, plus you get the cover as a bonus!
Plus if you join a fund after the age of 30, you'll always pay a higher premium than someone who joined younger. In fact the older you are, when you join, the higher your premiums will be.
(There was a 'grace' period for all ages before they brought that one in). It's to stop people only joining funds when they're old and sick and dropping in and out of funds, depending on how they're feeling.
Obviously, the industry needs people to be paying premiums whilst they're young and healthy to fund the old and sick ones.
This method means the people who did join young are not penalised and the people who left it too late, get to pay more.
#22
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Dream life UK....
Posts: 2,912
Originally posted by ABCDiamond
I'm already past that magic age, so thats another reason to be apprehensive about going into it now. And we dont earn enough to be penalised, so I still feel right to be out of it, and pay for anything as its needed, hoping I don't NEED a $20,000 operation, that would wipe out the saving made over a 10 year period .
I agree thats it good for some people, I do know someone who gets back,in benefits, about 150% of what they pay almost every year.
I'm already past that magic age, so thats another reason to be apprehensive about going into it now. And we dont earn enough to be penalised, so I still feel right to be out of it, and pay for anything as its needed, hoping I don't NEED a $20,000 operation, that would wipe out the saving made over a 10 year period .
I agree thats it good for some people, I do know someone who gets back,in benefits, about 150% of what they pay almost every year.
#23
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Originally posted by dotty
Its a problem in both countries. Its not a UK V OZ issue.
A good start in many countries would be to tackle health issues at the root of the problem. Self responsibility. Look at most people these days, junk food diet, processed food. Very little exercise.
Take smoking alone, what would the health service save if smokes went up to $20.00 a pack. $10.00 of that going straight to the health service. Junk food tax, why not, its rubbish it kills us so why not tax it. Plus look at how many people here get subsidised prescriptions but can afford $115 for a carton of fags.
Its a problem in both countries. Its not a UK V OZ issue.
A good start in many countries would be to tackle health issues at the root of the problem. Self responsibility. Look at most people these days, junk food diet, processed food. Very little exercise.
Take smoking alone, what would the health service save if smokes went up to $20.00 a pack. $10.00 of that going straight to the health service. Junk food tax, why not, its rubbish it kills us so why not tax it. Plus look at how many people here get subsidised prescriptions but can afford $115 for a carton of fags.
Sadly John Anderson of the Country Party is in a Sugar Cane constituency and the coalition is given heavy donations by Manildra (a suger processor). This means the coalition is very sympathetic to the junk food industry and has recently changed the law to allow food products to be promoted by individual health benefits. Dieticians complain that this means packaged products with a single health benefit will be advertised and consumers will be misled into thinking they are being healthy. Instead the benefits of a healthy diet should be promoted.
My personal opinion is that cigarettes should be banned. Most smokers I know want to give up and unlike alcohol or other drugs the stuff provides no high.
The problem is that people are living longer and the treatments are costing more.
#24
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: In Perth for a while
Posts: 111
I don't know whether you can still do this, times may have changed. We were on Medicare basic which we paid for as a levy when filling in our tax return.
In addition, we took out through a fund ancilliary cover only, which took care of ambulance, dentist, optician, physio etc.
In addition, we took out through a fund ancilliary cover only, which took care of ambulance, dentist, optician, physio etc.