Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia
Reload this Page >

Definition of a 'treating doctor'...

Definition of a 'treating doctor'...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:13 pm
  #1  
She's a bird, you know
Thread Starter
 
bundy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 7,655
bundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Definition of a 'treating doctor'...

I know this should be in the immi site, and I've had some help there, but I thought I'd throw this over here for help from the rest of you lot...

I have a crappy thyroid. I attend outpatients clinics at the hospital every few months (next one 12th Feb). So I'll need a report to take to the examining doctor when I have my medical for my visa.

The meds forms state that I need a report from my 'treating doctor'. Is this my GP or my consultant?

I have asthma too, so I already need a GP report on that (it's not treated at the hosp). Can I get him to combine it with a report on my thyroid? Would my GP count as my 'treating doctor'?

It's £36 (for GP report) versus £86 and a lot of hassle (Constultant AND GP report)...

Any thoughts?
bundy is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:19 pm
  #2  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,384
ANA123 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Hello Bundy,
I think it may have to be a report from your consultant for the thyroid. GP's refer on if they feel the problem is beyond their spere of expertise and then follow the recomendations of the specialist who is then the treating doctor. My daughter and husband both had a minor heart murmur which has no symptoms and requires no treatment but a specialist report was still required as it was considered outside the spere of general practice.
Michaela
ANA123 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:19 pm
  #3  
ABCDiamond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Look up " treating doctor definition "
on
www.google.com.au
and look for OZ government sites "something.gov.au"

That way you see how the Australian Government define "treating doctor"

Hope it helps
 
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:22 pm
  #4  
She's a bird, you know
Thread Starter
 
bundy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 7,655
bundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally posted by mcmercer
Hello Bundy,
I think it may have to be a report from your consultant for the thyroid. GP's refer on if they feel the problem is beyond their spere of expertise and then follow the recomendations of the specialist who is then the treating doctor. My daughter and husband both had a minor heart murmur which has no symptoms and requires no treatment but a specialist report was still required as it was considered outside the spere of general practice.
Michaela



Looks like I'll have to spend a fortune then. Trying to get hold of the clinic which will do my medical, but no answer yet. Thought they might be able to confirm it for me.
bundy is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:29 pm
  #5  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,384
ANA123 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Though Bundy, if your consultant sends a report to your GP after your outpatients appt. (this is usual practice) a copy of that letter would suffice. We didnt make a further appt for hubby and daughter, just sent copy letters (hubbys was from 20 years ago as that was when he was last seen by a cardiologist) and that was fine. GP didnt charge for this just provided the photocopies from their notes. If you have had a number of OP appts, ask for copies of all the letters and you could send the most positive. The Dr who did our medical advised us to do this and assured us it was still meeting requirements.
ANA123 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:31 pm
  #6  
She's a bird, you know
Thread Starter
 
bundy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 7,655
bundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond reputebundy has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally posted by mcmercer
Though Bundy, if your consultant sends a report to your GP after your outpatients appt. (this is usual practice) a copy of that letter would suffice. We didnt make a further appt for hubby and daughter, just sent copy letters (hubbys was from 20 years ago as that was when he was last seen by a cardiologist) and that was fine. GP didnt charge for this just provided the photocopies from their notes. If you have had a number of OP appts, ask for copies of all the letters and you could send the most positive. The Dr who did our medical advised us to do this and assured us it was still meeting requirements.
This is what I thought. I know the consultant sends reports to the GP - I've seen 'em. So I should just be able to get photocopies, right? That would be good. I thought I could provide copies of those reports and copies of my blood test results from the last two years since diagnosis.

The blurb on the medical form does state 'copies of EXISTING [in bold] reports'....

Still confused and worried though
bundy is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2004, 12:36 pm
  #7  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,384
ANA123 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Cant really reassure you I suppose as every case is different but we sent one copy letter, carefully chosen from several and there were no problems whatsoever, we received the visa 6 weeks later. Though my husband was no longer under a specialist, my daughter was at the time (and it wasnt the most recent letter we sent as that didnt contain much info) but they didnt investigate it further.

Good luck,
Michaela
ANA123 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.