Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia
Reload this Page >

Best for families?

Best for families?

Old Jan 15th 2013, 9:11 pm
  #1  
Frequent Flyer Member
Thread Starter
 
bcworld's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,994
bcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond reputebcworld has a reputation beyond repute
Default Best for families?

The question is often asked...now we have another dodgy quality of life survey to get our teeth into!

Smaller cities most liveable for families

A GREAT deal is made of Melbourne's much-vaunted ''liveability'' and Sydney's glam harbourside lifestyle.
But for families who grow weary of the rat race, it seems the sedate Tasmanian city of Launceston is the country's most family-friendly place.


Bit of a different result to some of the others...but as usual Brisbane still comes bottom of the major cities (24th).
bcworld is offline  
Old Jan 15th 2013, 10:04 pm
  #2  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Kim67's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 5,461
Kim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

I love Launceston, we seriously thought of moving there after visiting as my husband works from home and can base himself anywhere. It's a great city. Problem with Tasmania is finding work though if you have to.
Kim67 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 6:12 am
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: The REAL Utopia.
Posts: 9,910
chris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Every one of these surveys contradicts the last one, I have no idea where they dig up the 'facts' they are based on ? Toowoomba 3rd on the list
I personally wouldnt live in any city anywhere.
Read some of the comments following the story, it is clearly impossible to reach a concensus which makes these surveys pointless but entertaining.
chris955 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 6:21 am
  #4  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
ozzieeagle's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,526
ozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond reputeozzieeagle has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

I'm surprised that Launceston and Toowomba have City status personally.

Do they both have cathederals or something ? Do Aus Cities have to qualify with Cathederals ?
ozzieeagle is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 6:23 am
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: The REAL Utopia.
Posts: 9,910
chris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

I think more than 500 people have to live there.
chris955 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 7:34 am
  #6  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
quoll's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 8,377
quoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond reputequoll has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by chris955
I think more than 500 people have to live there.
Don't be silly, Chris, it's 507 for city status!!!!

Good to see Canberra ranked so highly. Much underrated by the SydBrisMelAdelPerthites!
quoll is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 2:38 pm
  #7  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,396
roaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by Kim67
I love Launceston, we seriously thought of moving there after visiting as my husband works from home and can base himself anywhere. It's a great city. Problem with Tasmania is finding work though if you have to.
I would love to live in Tassie, although I prefer Hobart - though as you say finding work is the problem.
Originally Posted by ozzieeagle
Do Aus Cities have to qualify with Cathederals ?
Doubt it, UK cities don't have to have one since the late 19th century.
roaringmouse is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 3:05 pm
  #8  
Concierge
 
mikelincs's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: ex ex-pat, in Taunton
Posts: 27,193
mikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond reputemikelincs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by roaringmouse
Doubt it, UK cities don't have to have one since the late 19th century.
They now get city status by royal decree, or at least the government decide. They create a new city every so often like during the diamond jubilee etc.
mikelincs is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 7:29 pm
  #9  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,396
roaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond reputeroaringmouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by mikelincs
They now get city status by royal decree, or at least the government decide. They create a new city every so often like during the diamond jubilee etc.
In other words, towns enter a popularity contest to determine which one(s) is chosen to carry the largely pointless label of "city".

Of course you also got pretenders, like the towns of Milton Keynes and Reading which like to think of themselves as a city (whatever that status is meant to carry).
roaringmouse is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 7:46 pm
  #10  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by ozzieeagle
I'm surprised that Launceston and Toowomba have City status personally.

Do they both have cathederals or something ? Do Aus Cities have to qualify with Cathederals ?
Toowoomba has a cathedral and university. District pop around 130,000.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 7:48 pm
  #11  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by bcworld
The question is often asked...now we have another dodgy quality of life survey to get our teeth into!

Smaller cities most liveable for families

A GREAT deal is made of Melbourne's much-vaunted ''liveability'' and Sydney's glam harbourside lifestyle.
But for families who grow weary of the rat race, it seems the sedate Tasmanian city of Launceston is the country's most family-friendly place.


Bit of a different result to some of the others...but as usual Brisbane still comes bottom of the major cities (24th).
You weren't involved in the judging were you ?

Would like to know the criteria they used in this. If it was just things like low traffic and low house prices but not job availability or public facilities then I guess that's a given that big cities like Melbourne and Sydney would be beaten by small places.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Jan 16th 2013, 9:09 pm
  #12  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Kim67's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 5,461
Kim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond reputeKim67 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

Originally Posted by fish.01
You weren't involved in the judging were you ?

Would like to know the criteria they used in this. If it was just things like low traffic and low house prices but not job availability or public facilities then I guess that's a given that big cities like Melbourne and Sydney would be beaten by small places.
I saw the guy from Suncorp Bank who put the list together and it was based on things like income, housing affordability, education, unemployment, crime rate. The major cities were brought way down by housing affordability.
Kim67 is offline  
Old Jan 17th 2013, 6:17 am
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: The REAL Utopia.
Posts: 9,910
chris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond reputechris955 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Best for families?

I saw another thread where someone was talking about Townsville being rated so highly and how great it was but it was one if the worst for crime, wouldnt a very high crime rate immediately make it LESS good for families ?
chris955 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.