![]() |
Re: Australian voting system
Can you not just vote for your first choice, even though you have more votes, I've done this in organisations where I just don't want any other candidate. If I've given no preference to any other candidate, then if my candidate loses in the first round at least no other candidate will get my vote.
In Spain it's pure PR, you vote only for a party, and once the votes are counted to seats get allocated according to the number of votes each has received, the candidate choice is by the order on the party list, which you see when you get the bzllot paper. |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by mikelincs
(Post 10612309)
Can you not just vote for your first choice, even though you have more votes, I've done this in organisations where I just don't want any other candidate. If I've given no preference to any other candidate, then if my candidate loses in the first round at least no other candidate will get my vote.
In Spain it's pure PR, you vote only for a party, and once the votes are counted to seats get allocated according to the number of votes each has received, the candidate choice is by the order on the party list, which you see when you get the bzllot paper. |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 10612335)
Some elections/houses you have to preference every candidate in your preferred order, some you can just preference if you want to, some use first past the post.
Can you say 1 - this man/woman. (I realise that you're voting for the local candidate but hey.) Then leave the rest blank? |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 10612383)
Federal election. The big one.
Can you say 1 - this man/woman. (I realise that you're voting for the local candidate but hey.) Then leave the rest blank? |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by KJCherokee
(Post 10611448)
I live in Wayne Swan's constituency and I accept the fact that my vote probably won't make any difference to the result, but I hate to think that I have to give a preference to either him or his Liberal opponent
Originally Posted by KJCherokee
(Post 10611448)
And compulsory voting for local council elections as well - I copped a $20 fine at the last Brisbane one for deciding I had more important things to do that day.
|
Re: Australian voting system
The problem with the Australian voting system is that come September either Gillard or Abbott will be in charge.
|
Re: Australian voting system
Or Rudd.
|
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 10612446)
No, KJCherokee gives a good explanation of the federal voting in post #3 if you're interested.
|
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by chris955
(Post 10612706)
The problem with the Australian voting system is that come September either Gillard or Abbott will be in charge.
|
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
(Post 10613992)
So for the time being, we're 'forced' to have our votes distributed in order of preference. Seems to me then that I have to gen up on the candidates and rank accordingly if I want to take the process seriously.
Exactly - but this is politically apathetic Australia - So the majority won't... S |
Re: Australian voting system
No system is perfect, but at least with the FPTP the person who is elected has had more votes than any of the others - seems fair to me.
The preferential system to me is a travesty of what democracy should be: it is only kept in place because the major parties want to be able to use your votes the way THEY want - not the way YOU want. So unlikely to be changed. |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 10613995)
Exactly - but this is politically apathetic Australia - So the majority won't...
S You'd have to have a lot of time on your hands to gen up in any country that uses the same system. Isn't a paradox that on the one hand Australia is generally politically apathetic yet everyone has to vote - and so unless they spoil, they have to put a 1 and a 2 somewhere. I think Australia is much more pathetic in encouraging quality pollies to rise to the top. What are the percentages of people spoiling their vote. This would be some mark of how apathetic/pathetic (which word do I need this time I wonder!) Australian voters are. |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 10614000)
No system is perfect, but at least with the FPTP the person who is elected has had more votes than any of the others - seems fair to me.
The preferential system to me is a travesty of what democracy should be: it is only kept in place because the major parties want to be able to use your votes the way THEY want - not the way YOU want. So unlikely to be changed. When you talk about major parties using your votes the way they want, are you talking about above the line voting (for the Senate if I am not now mistaken and you do have a choice to vote below the line) or for the lower house? Certainly for lower house, aren't the votes distributed from the person that came last, based on the way people voted. I would suggest that in practise,people vote 1,2 in Australia (and maybe 3) for the major parties so it's probably not an issue. |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 10614000)
No system is perfect, but at least with the FPTP the person who is elected has had more votes than any of the others - seems fair to me.
The preferential system to me is a travesty of what democracy should be: it is only kept in place because the major parties want to be able to use your votes the way THEY want - not the way YOU want. So unlikely to be changed. So is FPTP not the most representative system at seat level? it could be argued that it may be, but when the seats are aggregated over the country, it often follows that the ruling party is not the party that obtained most of the popular vote nationwide. But trying to represent that leads to PR and the splinter parties - unquestionably under PR fringe parties like the NF could gain a legitimate seat. S |
Re: Australian voting system
Originally Posted by Swerv-o
(Post 10614022)
So is FPTP not the most representative system at seat level? it could be argued that it may be, but when the seats are aggregated over the country, it often follows that the ruling party is not the party that obtained most of the popular vote nationwide. But trying to represent that leads to PR and the splinter parties - unquestionably under PR fringe parties like the NF could gain a legitimate seat.
S |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:55 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.