Anti 4x4 sentiment
#16
Victorian Evangelist
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, by the beach, living the dream.
Posts: 7,704
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Last time I was in London I was amazed at the amount of off-road driving there was for the 4WD drive to kick in!
Most people who are anti-4WD probably object on the grounds of things like taking up more road and parking space, the fuel they consume, the gases they emit.
Ironically, Chelsea tractors almost rhymes with your parting pearl of wisdom.
OzTennis
Most people who are anti-4WD probably object on the grounds of things like taking up more road and parking space, the fuel they consume, the gases they emit.
Ironically, Chelsea tractors almost rhymes with your parting pearl of wisdom.
OzTennis
For instance, 232Bar's Nissan Pathfinder does 8.1litres/100k. Almost no family saloons in Oz achieve that little fuel consumption.
As for taking up more road space, they only do that in a vertical direction!
Buzzy
#17
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Is there a massive anti 4x4 sentiment in Oz like there is in London?
We need 7 seats, diesel, with all the safety features for the kids, and the only vehicle that seems to fit the bill is a 4x4.
So we're going to buy one, but are concerned about any backlash against us from well-meaning people who don't like 4x4 drivers.
Anyone like to comment?
Thanks
Simon
We need 7 seats, diesel, with all the safety features for the kids, and the only vehicle that seems to fit the bill is a 4x4.
So we're going to buy one, but are concerned about any backlash against us from well-meaning people who don't like 4x4 drivers.
Anyone like to comment?
Thanks
Simon
#18
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Actually, if your 4x4 is a diesel, it is probably more environmentally friendly and has better fuel consumption than your average family saloon.
For instance, 232Bar's Nissan Pathfinder does 8.1litres/100k. Almost no family saloons in Oz achieve that little fuel consumption.
As for taking up more road space, they only do that in a vertical direction!
Buzzy
For instance, 232Bar's Nissan Pathfinder does 8.1litres/100k. Almost no family saloons in Oz achieve that little fuel consumption.
As for taking up more road space, they only do that in a vertical direction!
Buzzy
"diesel engines spew out 100 times more sooty particles than gasoline engines. As a result, diesel engines account for an estimated 26 percent of the total hazardous particulate pollution (PM10) from fuel combustion sources in our air, and 66 percent of the particulate pollution from on-road sources. Diesel engines also produce nearly 20 percent of the total nitrogen oxides (NOx) in outdoor air and 26 percent of the total NOx from on-road sources. Nitrogen oxides are a major contributor to ozone production and smog."
But good fuel consumption comparatively speaking!
OzTennis
#19
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Actually, if your 4x4 is a diesel, it is probably more environmentally friendly and has better fuel consumption than your average family saloon.
For instance, 232Bar's Nissan Pathfinder does 8.1litres/100k. Almost no family saloons in Oz achieve that little fuel consumption.
As for taking up more road space, they only do that in a vertical direction!
Buzzy
For instance, 232Bar's Nissan Pathfinder does 8.1litres/100k. Almost no family saloons in Oz achieve that little fuel consumption.
As for taking up more road space, they only do that in a vertical direction!
Buzzy
#20
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
hate to burst you bubble but that is a falsehood ,fuel consuption for most diesel family cars is around the 8-9 l/100k mark but diesel burns so much dirtier than petrol the difference lies in the ability to filter the exhaust as diesel generates more "soot" which is easyer to remove and so the exhaused appears cleaner you will notice that a diesel with a busted exhaust is black and smelly . the high carbons are about the same for both fuels .but as I said before for a city slicker (excuse the term) a 4x4 is an unneccerssary expense and hard to justify .
ZX.....
#21
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I don't suggest they justify it to me or you ,just them selves ,like justifying the expense to the use , I would like a $6000 laptop but I cannot justify spending the money ,I can buy one bucause I want it but a machine @ $1500 will do what I need .hope that clarifies my point
#23
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 835
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Most people I speak to say that it more to do with safety than pollution. 4x4 drivers seem to be more aggressive drivers than smaller cars over here. The mentality being I'm safe in my high up car so I can drive faster etc. I have seen quite a few 4x4 that have rolled in accidents and also have caused real damage to cars they have crashed into (living near a motorway). I'm not personally against them although why my single next door neighbor who never goes off road, and only seems to drive 2 miles and back to the station, needs his is beyond me .
#24
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Cairns
Posts: 3,918
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
Where we live, there are a lot of 4x4's on the road and nobody gives a rats arse, if you can afford to run one, then good on ya. Generally, they are a necessity if you want to get anywhere especially gorgeous for the weekend.
An aside:
I was in a major shopping mall this week - got back to the car park and found a woman about to drive off - she'd left a note on my windscreen saying "Sorry" and her number, then saw me and stopped -
She'd driven her Landcruiser into the side of my parked Rav4 - thought she had enough room to manoeuver into the space beside me - Jesus!
That's my only gripe - if you're going to own a big arse vehicle, make sure you can bloody drive it and park it!!!:curse:
An aside:
I was in a major shopping mall this week - got back to the car park and found a woman about to drive off - she'd left a note on my windscreen saying "Sorry" and her number, then saw me and stopped -
She'd driven her Landcruiser into the side of my parked Rav4 - thought she had enough room to manoeuver into the space beside me - Jesus!
That's my only gripe - if you're going to own a big arse vehicle, make sure you can bloody drive it and park it!!!:curse:
#25
Victorian Evangelist
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, by the beach, living the dream.
Posts: 7,704
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
there are many MPV,s that provide 7 seats with out going to a 4x4 .I drive a Disco because I work in the middle of nowhere but if you live work and drive round town you may feel safe but you are a danger to others (visability ,impact damage, etc) if you are a road user not a bush basher then I would seriously concider a MPV before a 4x4 . people who drive 4x4 in cities and never leave the black buy them for status the excuses used ,safer room, etc are just that ,excuses. the diesel feature is avail in mpv's 7 seats are safety is also a feature the expense of runing a 4x4 is hard to justify for city use ,service twice the price parts 3 or 4 times the price tyres ,taxes , parking is more difficult If I were in your position I would concider very carfully . however I have assumed you are a city boy based on you question if you live out back of nowhere then thats a different story
diesel
full length side curtain airbags
leather seats
cruise control
rear park assist.
and I will happily consider buying it.
I have researched every 7 seater available in Oz and haven't found an MPV that offers all this, for the price of the Pathfinder.
my research -
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=376751
Buzzy
Last edited by Buzzy--Bee; Mar 30th 2007 at 12:38 pm.
#27
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Caloundra
Posts: 37
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I have a 4x4 so i am not going to bash people who own one, but what i will say is that i also owned a small car. I did not have an issue then with 4x4 and i did not have small car syndrom. I loved my small car, we could fit in spaces that others could'nt and it was great on fuel and insurance costs! My 4x4 is not the largerst around it's a just a average one. If you can afford the biggest then great but does that make you a safe driver or a sensible one. Its not the car that causes accidents its the driver. There are too many drivers that think that they can drive at any speed! Even next to schools and in inner residential areas. As for the inviroment, we all drive so we all pollute end of really. Only answer is to walk, and in oz thats not a option!
#28
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
You tell me which 7 seat MPV provides -
diesel
full length side curtain airbags
leather seats
cruise control
rear park assist.
and I will happily consider buying it.
I have researched every 7 seater available in Oz and haven't found an MPV that offers all this, for the price of the Pathfinder.
my research -
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=376751
Buzzy
diesel
full length side curtain airbags
leather seats
cruise control
rear park assist.
and I will happily consider buying it.
I have researched every 7 seater available in Oz and haven't found an MPV that offers all this, for the price of the Pathfinder.
my research -
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=376751
Buzzy
#29
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
I have a 4x4 so i am not going to bash people who own one, but what i will say is that i also owned a small car. I did not have an issue then with 4x4 and i did not have small car syndrom. I loved my small car, we could fit in spaces that others could'nt and it was great on fuel and insurance costs! My 4x4 is not the largerst around it's a just a average one. If you can afford the biggest then great but does that make you a safe driver or a sensible one. Its not the car that causes accidents its the driver. There are too many drivers that think that they can drive at any speed! Even next to schools and in inner residential areas. As for the inviroment, we all drive so we all pollute end of really. Only answer is to walk, and in oz thats not a option!
I don't drive. Not been a problem for me.
I walk to school every day (20 minutes there and then the same back again). If I need to go anywhere then I get on the bus or train
#30
Victorian Evangelist
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, by the beach, living the dream.
Posts: 7,704
Re: Anti 4x4 sentiment
up to you of course ,but leather in this clmate is not a good idea tends to need a lot of care and heat ,kids etc make it difficult . the toyota tarago gives you the rest and in a range from cheap and standard to top of the line got the kitchen sink in the back style . people make alot of air bags but you will find that in most accidents they are not activated as the impact isn't sever enough to warrant they deployment . Cars are biult to absorb the impact and seat belts do the same it is only at the point that they can't cope that the bags deploy . If you are bent on buying a 4x4 then buy one but you asked for opinion . if you want to tow travel in style and have the best use of internal space the new landrover in the best on the market and will pull upto 4tonne (with elect brakes ) the v6 diesel returns 8.2l/100k and can be bought with the leather interior.and the ladies like driving them .
The Toyota Tarago doesnt have a diesel option or leather, it doesn't have the 3-row side curtain airbags and it drinks more fuel than the Pathfinder. Plus it costs almost $70,000 and has a 3.5 litre engine!!! I've never owned a car with an engine that big!
The landrover costs $85,000!
Buzzy
Last edited by Buzzy--Bee; Mar 30th 2007 at 1:15 pm.