44 - 4
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by Hels
Need I say more??
and it came up with ...........
44 - 4 = 40
More about calculator.
But then a deeper search revealed.. uh uh ... a Scottish website proclaiming the results of a match !!
http://sport.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3813514
#3
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,235
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
Well, it lost me, so I did a google search for your heading 44 - 4
and it came up with ...........
44 - 4 = 40
More about calculator.
But then a deeper search revealed.. uh uh ... a Scottish website proclaiming the results of a match !!
http://sport.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3813514
and it came up with ...........
44 - 4 = 40
More about calculator.
But then a deeper search revealed.. uh uh ... a Scottish website proclaiming the results of a match !!
http://sport.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3813514
I didnt wanna say TOO much...ya know how it is...
#5
life begins again...
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: doncaster..then scunny... now canberra.
Posts: 1,790
Re: 44 - 4
all i can say is GO AUSTRALIA!! but of course it would have been different if the GB had won.
would have liked to have seen england play aus though, that looked like a close game!
would have liked to have seen england play aus though, that looked like a close game!
#6
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by ABCDiamond
Well, it lost me, so I did a google search for your heading 44 - 4
and it came up with ...........
44 - 4 = 40
and it came up with ...........
44 - 4 = 40
Glad we could be of some assistance,
Cheers,
JTL
#7
Here at last
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Now here in sunny Sandy Beach, near Coffs Harbour, N.S.W.)
Posts: 774
Re: 44 - 4
Lets not forget 21 - 19!!
#8
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by Hels
Need I say more??
#9
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by TheRossers
Lets not forget 21 - 19!!
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 44 - 4
The missed kick by Gomarsall from in front of the posts would have drawn or won the match, and Hodgskon (Sic) missed a few.
Tindall amazed me by kicking 2 effortlessly.
It was a great game, and what we should all be taking from this is that France, SA, NZ, Aus, Eng are all in the top tier of rugby and all beat each other from time to time. There is now, for the first time in years a kind of equality of sorts, if I may. eg Aus won for years, England won for 3-4 over many southern hemi teams, not just Australia, now from 2004 its all up for grabs.
BM
Tindall amazed me by kicking 2 effortlessly.
It was a great game, and what we should all be taking from this is that France, SA, NZ, Aus, Eng are all in the top tier of rugby and all beat each other from time to time. There is now, for the first time in years a kind of equality of sorts, if I may. eg Aus won for years, England won for 3-4 over many southern hemi teams, not just Australia, now from 2004 its all up for grabs.
BM
#11
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,149
Re: 44 - 4
Originally Posted by Badge
The missed kick by Gomarsall from in front of the posts would have drawn or won the match, and Hodgskon (Sic) missed a few.
Tindall amazed me by kicking 2 effortlessly.
It was a great game, and what we should all be taking from this is that France, SA, NZ, Aus, Eng are all in the top tier of rugby and all beat each other from time to time. There is now, for the first time in years a kind of equality of sorts, if I may. eg Aus won for years, England won for 3-4 over many southern hemi teams, not just Australia, now from 2004 its all up for grabs.
BM
Tindall amazed me by kicking 2 effortlessly.
It was a great game, and what we should all be taking from this is that France, SA, NZ, Aus, Eng are all in the top tier of rugby and all beat each other from time to time. There is now, for the first time in years a kind of equality of sorts, if I may. eg Aus won for years, England won for 3-4 over many southern hemi teams, not just Australia, now from 2004 its all up for grabs.
BM