![]() |
|
|
|
ViewsK1 London Financial SupportFrom Wiki
After arriving in the US as a K-1 and getting married to your USC petitioner, you will need to file Adjustment of Status to Permanent Residency. That application will require a new, different form of the Affidavit of Support. Please see form I-864. TOP TIP: Always download your forms from uscis.gov for the most up to date forms and instructions. [edit] Evidence Which May Be Presented to Meet the Public Charge Provisions of the LawK-1 and K-3 and their derivatives are not required to file an affidavit of support, form I-864 at the time he or she applies for the visa. An applicant for K-1 or K-3 visa may generally satisfy the requirement of the law by the presentation of documentary evidence establishing that: 1. the applicant has, or will have in the U.S. personal funds sufficient to provide support for the applicant and dependent family members, if any, or sufficient to provide support until suitable employment is located; 2. the applicant has arranged employment in the U.S. that will provide an adequate income for the applicant and dependent family members; 3. relatives or friends in the U.S. will assure the applicant's support; or 4. a combination of the above circumstances USER NOTE: Please read the above carefully. Note that there is no mention of income levels, poverty guidelines or household members. While many people use those measurements (from the I-864) they are not necessarily the measurement the Consular Officer applies in the visa interview. Please go back and re-read the 4 points above one more time.
An applicant who expects to be able to meet the public charge provisions of the law through personal financial resources may submit to the consular officer evidence of funds or income from one or more of the following sources:
If the financial resources are derived from a source outside the United States, a statement as to how the funds or income are to be transferred to the U.S. must be provided.
USER NOTE: This does not apply to most K-1 visa applicants, as they will not have employment authorization for their first 90 days (minimum). An applicant relying on an offer of prearranged employment to meet the public charge provisions of the law should have the prospective employer submit a notarized letter of employment on the letter head stationary of the employing business. The letter should:
Persons in the U.S. who wish to furnish sponsorship of a fiancee or Kii visa applicant in the form of an affidavit of support should use form I-134 which is available from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Sponsors may also elect to furnish a statement in the form of an affidavit sworn to before a notary public or other official competent to administer an oath, setting forth his or her willingness and financial ability to contribute to the applicant's support and reasons, in detail, for sponsoring the applicant. The affidavit should include:
To substantiate the information regarding income and resources the sponsor should attached two or more of the following items to the affidavit.
This is a link to the google cache of the above page.
[edit] User Experiences Regarding Evidence[1] he asked if I had an affadavit of support so I handed him an I-134 my mother-in-law-to-be had filled out along with letters from her employer and bank. He asked if I had tax returns for her and I told him I had those as well if they were helpful. He told me that they weren't essential but it made everything a lot easier and handed me back the letters in favour of the tax documents. After glancing at them he asked what my fiancée's name was, and after I told him he asked if I had an I-134 from her. Apparently he wanted to see that and kept it along with her tax records despite the fact she has only just graduated college and had an annual income last year of ~$3000.
[8] K-1 Visa: Application Links That Work/Important Evidence of Support Info
[9] Now the paperwork she asked for was quite interesting, as there was no request for additional evidence of relationship, or fiancée bank and pay statements, or the letter from her bank. She only wanted one copy of the I-134, my police certificate, long birth certificate, divorce paperwork, and my fiancées U.S. tax return. She already had the DS-156, DS-156k and DS-230 Part I as I had returned that to them before the interview. She asked me when I planned to fly back to the U.S.
"Tax returns aren't essential but they're the easiest for us, and thus you, to deal with. You can use the other forms of evidence but we'll always take tax returns if you have them." In my case they took the last year's tax return for my mother-in-law-to-be (who has money) and my fiancée (who does not). because I had those he wasn't interested in anything else. I got the impression it would have yielded a lot more prodding and questioning if I didn't have the tax returns. As far as to why they were so long, it was two things. Firstly it was a joint tax return for both of her parents and they've both got quite a few little pots of things - and I mean little - but they're all listed separately. Secondly, they'd put all their State Tax stuff in as well.
The I-134 is an "either/or" document. You don't typically need all the suggested evidence to show the ability to sponsor. Tax returns are asked for by the US Consulate in London but you can also just give them a letter from an employer stating position and salary. This would be relevant in the case of a new employee, say fresh from college, who never had to file a tax return because they never worked before. Or say the sponsor is using income and assets to prove evidence of ability to sponsor. Then why would need tax returns and bank statements showing income and the required assets. Or perhaps the sponsor retired and is using only assets, then they definitely need bank and financial institution statements showing the required assets. It is great to have all three but it is not a requirement. Back in 1997 when this marriage-based forum was started on the Usenet both Ian and myself were part of the original users and this argument was always around. I, for one, provided all suggested forms of sponsorship evidence to my then fiancee who used the US Consulate in Montreal. It was overkill. Remember also that the I-134 is not just used for the K visas. It's primary use is for those visitors who are applying for visitor vistas and need to show that when they are in the US (for a long period of time, i.e. six months) will have a USC or resident who will support their visit financially.
"The thing you perhaps don't understand, is that words have specific meaning. US immigration forms (as well as forms for most other US agencies) ask very simple questions and give very simple information. Don't try to interpret any question or information as anything other than face value. Take, for example, the bit above which you quoted on the I-134. "Evidence should consist of..." Note the word "should". The form doesn't say, "Evidence will consist of..." Since the word "should" and "will" mean two entirely different things don't be surprised if things are asked for which aren't on the form."
JEff says: "Understand that I-134 for non-immigrants, unlike I-864 for immigrants, does not lay out the requirements for meeting the public charge provisions of the law. DS-2000 does that. Further, I-134 is but one of several items that may be required for a consular officer to determine if the visa applicant meets the public charge provisions. Income tax returns are one of the other items that may be required, totally independent of the I-134. The ultimate requirement is that the consular officer be satisfied that the proferred sponsor is both able to and will provide the support that they are offering. The consular officer can ask for whatever they feel they need to be satisfied." |