Having a baby in the USA
#46
Re: Having a baby in the USA
Gosh. I do find it bizarre that a poster has the balls to advise others on what is best for them and their families based on the OPs own preferences and circumstances. I wouldn't normally wade in on the discussion but this is my field of interest (I work at a Gender Research Centre) and I can't stop myself 😌 Childrearing is an occupation like any other. It is merely something that occupies your time. While there might be no direct economic value, I think we can all agree that individuals can choose that occupation over any other, if they do wish, and irrespective of long- and short-term financial gain, professional implications and the choices and preferences of others.
I thought my comments were directly relevant since the conversation had gone over to the financial aspects of childcare. Please note that I did not in any way denigrate someone staying at home to look after the children full time. I've done it at various times. You are being naiive if you think that the choice to stay at home is "irrespective of long and short term financial gain".
In an ideal world, we would all be able to choose whatever we wish to do. This world is not ideal and the US less so than most places when it comes to childcare and choices.
In France, I had my 3rd child there and was given a very generous allowance to stay at home for 3 years (like every french maman). Creche was so cheap and good quality as to not even think about if I went back to work and places were plentiful too. At 2.5 the kids could go to ecole maternelle all day - this was free too. When the child reached 3, then the extra money stopped and a good french maman was expected to go back to work at the job that was hers previously. And we did. Because in France, mothers are expected to work, to contribute to society. You also can't access your spouse's pension if you divorce, you need your own.
So, if you want to get huffy with me, go ahead. But really you should be marching on the streets, calling your political representatives and trying to achieve for US mothers something like the deal they would get in France that actually makes it possible to have a choice.
#47
Re: Having a baby in the USA
Crikey and apparently I was being HUFFY!
I thought my comments were directly relevant since the conversation had gone over to the financial aspects of childcare. Please note that I did not in any way denigrate someone staying at home to look after the children full time. I've done it at various times. You are being naiive if you think that the choice to stay at home is "irrespective of long and short term financial gain".
In an ideal world, we would all be able to choose whatever we wish to do. This world is not ideal and the US less so than most places when it comes to childcare and choices.
In France, I had my 3rd child there and was given a very generous allowance to stay at home for 3 years (like every french maman). Creche was so cheap and good quality as to not even think about if I went back to work and places were plentiful too. At 2.5 the kids could go to ecole maternelle all day - this was free too. When the child reached 3, then the extra money stopped and a good french maman was expected to go back to work at the job that was hers previously. And we did. Because in France, mothers are expected to work, to contribute to society. You also can't access your spouse's pension if you divorce, you need your own.
So, if you want to get huffy with me, go ahead. But really you should be marching on the streets, calling your political representatives and trying to achieve for US mothers something like the deal they would get in France that actually makes it possible to have a choice.
I thought my comments were directly relevant since the conversation had gone over to the financial aspects of childcare. Please note that I did not in any way denigrate someone staying at home to look after the children full time. I've done it at various times. You are being naiive if you think that the choice to stay at home is "irrespective of long and short term financial gain".
In an ideal world, we would all be able to choose whatever we wish to do. This world is not ideal and the US less so than most places when it comes to childcare and choices.
In France, I had my 3rd child there and was given a very generous allowance to stay at home for 3 years (like every french maman). Creche was so cheap and good quality as to not even think about if I went back to work and places were plentiful too. At 2.5 the kids could go to ecole maternelle all day - this was free too. When the child reached 3, then the extra money stopped and a good french maman was expected to go back to work at the job that was hers previously. And we did. Because in France, mothers are expected to work, to contribute to society. You also can't access your spouse's pension if you divorce, you need your own.
So, if you want to get huffy with me, go ahead. But really you should be marching on the streets, calling your political representatives and trying to achieve for US mothers something like the deal they would get in France that actually makes it possible to have a choice.
being a full time mum is not the best way to spend your time
All I'm saying is motherhood is devalued as it is, no need to shame those that choose to do it.
#48
Re: Having a baby in the USA
as a mother of children aged 14, 18 and 20. I have spent a LOT of time looking after them. I think I know what I'm talking about. I've loved it and not loved it. And when people start getting paid for staying at home and looking after their kids then I think you will have done your job.
Last edited by petitefrancaise; Mar 28th 2017 at 2:52 pm.
#50
Re: Having a baby in the USA
There wouldn't be much traffic on BE if you excluded posts soliciting advice and opinions, and responding posts of people recounting experience and giving opinions.
Last edited by Pulaski; Mar 28th 2017 at 4:14 pm.
#52
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,531
#53
Re: Having a baby in the USA
They go swimming 3 times a week; to the park and playgrounds every other day; on rainy days they have music, dancing and arts and craft and trips to the library; plant gardens at the start of the season and harvest in late August; go to the Bronx Zoo and to local farms; visit the water park once a season and the amusement park twice a season.
What does your child get for $6000 for two months? Gold leaf in their luncheon sandwich?
#54
Re: Having a baby in the USA
Even if you can afford to lose one income, I wouldn't advise it. Being a full time mum isn't the best way to spend your time. I've done it at times, but mostly I've managed part-time work as well. In the EU I was lucky enough that my professional skills meant I could pick up work basically where I left off.
PF, I understand that you were posting your point of view and what you demand and/or need in your life. It does come across as if you are putting down the women who chose to remain at home with their children if they can financially afford to.
There are plenty of women out there who do not need outside employment, either going to a lab or an office daily or working from home (which is hard to get for many), who find being a full time, hands on mom fulfilling and rewarding. I could not do it when I got divorced when the girls were 4 and 7. I had to work and they had to go into daycare. But for my oldest, yes, I stayed at homely happily for her first 7 years.
#55
Re: Having a baby in the USA
Are you saying that you had your teenage children with a nanny or in child care after the age of 13? Frankly, from a personal point of view and what my life as a single mother of two years ago, I find that mind boggling. My girls went to school and returned home, let themselves in, made their own after school snacks and did their homework all by themselves after the age of 13. One was 13 and the other 10. I got home from work at 6 pm. I fully realize this was over 30 years ago and times are different put I'm still amazed.
No. I'm saying that even when they are older there are times when their needs interfere with work. After school activities and sickness spring to mind.
PF, I understand that you were posting your point of view and what you demand and/or need in your life. It does come across as if you are putting down the women who chose to remain at home with their children if they can financially afford to.
There are plenty of women out there who do not need outside employment, either going to a lab or an office daily or working from home (which is hard to get for many), who find being a full time, hands on mom fulfilling and rewarding. I could not do it when I got divorced when the girls were 4 and 7. I had to work and they had to go into daycare. But for my oldest, yes, I stayed at homely happily for her first 7 years.
No. I'm saying that even when they are older there are times when their needs interfere with work. After school activities and sickness spring to mind.
PF, I understand that you were posting your point of view and what you demand and/or need in your life. It does come across as if you are putting down the women who chose to remain at home with their children if they can financially afford to.
There are plenty of women out there who do not need outside employment, either going to a lab or an office daily or working from home (which is hard to get for many), who find being a full time, hands on mom fulfilling and rewarding. I could not do it when I got divorced when the girls were 4 and 7. I had to work and they had to go into daycare. But for my oldest, yes, I stayed at homely happily for her first 7 years.
I think everyone believes they are making the best choices for themselves and their families at the point they are making them. Of course they do. I also think that women should look out for themselves and their future. Getting back into work after taking years out is no joke. Taking work well below your capabilities is often needed and our dear friend the gender research woman above I am sure will confirm that most women do not ever make up the difference in salary or job position that they lost from staying at home. I don't think women should be penalised for staying at home, I don't think they should go out to work if they don't want to.
Us ex-pats though, are a particularly vulnerable group too. This article from Huff post has been widely shared and commented on and considering the divorce rate amongst ex-pat couples I would think long and hard before giving up work entirely. It may feel like you are giving the baby the best start in life but at what cost?
Our Gilded Expat Cages | The Huffington Post
#56
Re: Having a baby in the USA
Getting back into work after taking years out is no joke. Taking work well below your capabilities is often needed and our dear friend the gender research woman above I am sure will confirm that most women do not ever make up the difference in salary or job position that they lost from staying at home. I don't think women should be penalised for staying at home, I don't think they should go out to work if they don't want to.
Us ex-pats though, are a particularly vulnerable group too. This article from Huff post has been widely shared and commented on and considering the divorce rate amongst ex-pat couples I would think long and hard before giving up work entirely. It may feel like you are giving the baby the best start in life but at what cost?
Our Gilded Expat Cages | The Huffington Post
Our Gilded Expat Cages | The Huffington Post
#57
Re: Having a baby in the USA
In the US , pregnancy and childbirth may come under a disability instead of maternity time off.
The Federal rules come under the FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) , this covers time off for a new birth or adoption (6 weeks). However the disability portion probably comes under the ADA.
Coverage for Pregnancy Disability. Pregnancy and any related illness or complication is one of the medical conditions covered under New York’s temporary disability insurance. An employee is entitled to coverage only for the time when she is actually unable to work due to pregnancy or childbirth.
New York Short-Term Disability and Pregnancy | Disability Secrets
This is quoted from NOLO , which I believe is a reputable source.
Time off can also vary by employer, as it can in the UK
I just saw that she is moving to NJ. She would have to check NJ state legislation.
The Federal rules come under the FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) , this covers time off for a new birth or adoption (6 weeks). However the disability portion probably comes under the ADA.
Coverage for Pregnancy Disability. Pregnancy and any related illness or complication is one of the medical conditions covered under New York’s temporary disability insurance. An employee is entitled to coverage only for the time when she is actually unable to work due to pregnancy or childbirth.
New York Short-Term Disability and Pregnancy | Disability Secrets
This is quoted from NOLO , which I believe is a reputable source.
Time off can also vary by employer, as it can in the UK
I just saw that she is moving to NJ. She would have to check NJ state legislation.
Last edited by mrken30; Mar 28th 2017 at 6:50 pm.
#58
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,577
Re: Having a baby in the USA
WOW ... my granddaughter's camp, which is through the public school, is $800 for the season and runs from 8 am to 3 pm and if you need your child to stay until 6 pm it is another $200 for the season.
They go swimming 3 times a week; to the park and playgrounds every other day; on rainy days they have music, dancing and arts and craft and trips to the library; plant gardens at the start of the season and harvest in late August; go to the Bronx Zoo and to local farms; visit the water park once a season and the amusement park twice a season.
What does your child get for $6000 for two months? Gold leaf in their luncheon sandwich?
They go swimming 3 times a week; to the park and playgrounds every other day; on rainy days they have music, dancing and arts and craft and trips to the library; plant gardens at the start of the season and harvest in late August; go to the Bronx Zoo and to local farms; visit the water park once a season and the amusement park twice a season.
What does your child get for $6000 for two months? Gold leaf in their luncheon sandwich?
It sounds like I should send my kids up there for the summer!
#59
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 294
Re: Having a baby in the USA
My daughter, who currently lives in New York and is moving to New Jersey soon, has found out she is pregnant. If anyone has had a baby in the USA I would be interested to hear about their experiences as I believe it is still very much a 'medical model'. She has private health cover. Her limited research so far has identified that maternity leave is very short and that it is quite common for babies to be put in nurseries from 3 months ? Has anyone got first hand experience of this and how did it work for you ? Depending on the circumstances I might very well have to go and help her out for a few months so am trying to get a few facts first.
Thanking you
Thanking you
First Congratulations xxx I had my baby in Upstate N.Y. 14 years ago when we first lived in the States (we are moving back this summer) the actual medical care was amazing, we had our own private room with our own bathroom, phone, tv, bed for my hubby and lots of supplies for the baby.
I saw my sister give birth here in the UK and I will say I'm so glad I had the experience I had! Her husband and I was kicked out of the hospital an hour after she had her c section. She was left with a baby in a ward with zero help, they refused to let her husband stay to help and you had to bring everything for the baby, in the States I ended up going home with everything from diapers to formula!
The big downside is the maternity leave there, I had a c section and was back at work when my baby was 8 weeks old and that was because I had a c section, if I had a vaginal birth it would have been 6 weeks!!!
#60
Re: Having a baby in the USA
When it is generally accepted that breastfeeding is preferred under almost all circumstances, it is pretty deplorable that the hospital staff are obligated to give away formula too all new mothers. .... Mrs P took hers out of the bag and left it behind!