Austin or San Francisco?
#17
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,148
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
Our rent is already what we would pay for a mortgage, and we don't get any tax breaks, so are actually worse off. Our daughter is only 12, so we have a good few years of school left yet. After renting for the last 7 years, I don't want to continue to do so. And call me a snob if you like, but I wouldn't buy a mobile home.
#19
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
http://www.trulia.com/property/31739...94041#photo-11
Last edited by N1cky; Mar 6th 2015 at 6:53 pm.
#22
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
There are quite a few mobile home parks around here. The homes sell for around $300k
325 Sylvan Avenue #139, Mountain View CA For Sale | Trulia.com
325 Sylvan Avenue #139, Mountain View CA For Sale | Trulia.com
#24
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
A trailer would be even scarier than a manufactured home.
#26
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
There are quite a few mobile home parks around here. The homes sell for around $300k
325 Sylvan Avenue #139, Mountain View CA For Sale | Trulia.com
325 Sylvan Avenue #139, Mountain View CA For Sale | Trulia.com
'This home won't last long!'
#28
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
If a tenuous connection to the ground is desirable during an earthquake - why are CA homeowners urged to have their homes retrofitted by bolting them to their foundations?
#29
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
I meant safe for people. The earthquake could cause significant damage to the structure of a building if it is free to bounce around.
#30
Re: Austin or San Francisco?
If they "bounce around" in a structure which is not secured to it's foundation during the big shake - I don't much fancy their odds.