NYC roll call-AOS
Dec 14th 2005, 4:04 pm
#16
MODERATOR
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 58,679
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Originally Posted by Visitor
I know they are overwhelmed with the deluge of applications.
All I would like to see is that they process applications in the order they were received.
That's logical right?
All I would like to see is that they process applications in the order they were received.
That's logical right?
Rene
Dec 14th 2005, 4:13 pm
#17
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 201
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Originally Posted by Visitor
I know they are overwhelmed with the deluge of applications.
All I would like to see is that they process applications in the order they were received.
That's logical right?
All I would like to see is that they process applications in the order they were received.
That's logical right?
I still can't believe that some of those who applied in 2005 received their benefits ahead of those who did so in 2002 under the "Pilot Program" umbrella...that was the most unfair initiative.
Dec 14th 2005, 4:15 pm
#18
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 280
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
True, but in our and a number of other cases, we are not talking about weeks. We are talking about 2 or 3 YEARS.
Originally Posted by Noorah101
That's not quite logical, because if someone submits an application one week before yours, but theirs is held up for some reason, you wouldn't want yours, which was received later, to be held up along with theirs, right? So they can't really process them in order of received. Also, there are different people working on the applications...one person might clear 3 files off their desk in one day, while someone else clears 5 in one day...when they go grab more files to work on, the older ones will still be sitting on person 1's desk, while person 2 is working on newer files. So again, they get out of order in processing.
Rene
Rene
Dec 14th 2005, 4:18 pm
#19
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 50
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Why would you assume that delays are due to "problems" with some applications. There is plenty of evidence on this board suggesting otherwise.
Dec 14th 2005, 5:14 pm
#20
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 201
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Originally Posted by Noorah101
That's not quite logical, because if someone submits an application one week before yours, but theirs is held up for some reason, you wouldn't want yours, which was received later, to be held up along with theirs, right? So they can't really process them in order of received. Also, there are different people working on the applications...one person might clear 3 files off their desk in one day, while someone else clears 5 in one day...when they go grab more files to work on, the older ones will still be sitting on person 1's desk, while person 2 is working on newer files. So again, they get out of order in processing.
Rene
Rene
I really doubt that what you are saying applies when one applies in 2002, and is still pending in 2005 when those who applied in 2005 already have their GC....
Now of course we have to define what you mean by "held up for some reason" most of the, the applicant does not have any control over "those reasons"
Dec 14th 2005, 6:28 pm
#21
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Originally Posted by Visitor
All I would like to see is that they process applications in the order they were received. That's logical right?
Originally Posted by grouchy
True, but in our and a number of other cases, we are not talking about weeks. We are talking about 2 or 3 YEARS.
Ian
Dec 14th 2005, 10:46 pm
#22
Just Joined
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 4
Re: NYC roll call-AOS
Originally Posted by grouchy
So we have been waiting 27 months-filed mid-August 2003. Any other 2003 people from New York still out there?
Add us to the list -- filed September 4, 2003 and still waiting.
