Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Old May 29th 2015, 3:55 pm
  #16  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Flower Mound Texas
Posts: 242
Twigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud ofTwigstar has much to be proud of
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Yes we have a 5 year E2 visa (Aug 13- Aug 18) so I-94 needed renewing by August 15th this year.
Twigstar is offline  
Old May 29th 2015, 4:03 pm
  #17  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Ray is a cohabitating partner?
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old May 29th 2015, 7:40 pm
  #18  
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by MarylandNed
Interesting because, technically speaking, you should not be able to do that. You're not supposed to be able to reset the 90 day clock with a trip to Canada, Mexico or the Caribbean.

https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/det...ible-countries

While in the U.S., you may go to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean and Adjacent Islands and re-enter the U.S. using the I-94 admission notation you were issued on your VWP passport when you first arrived in the U.S., although the time you spend there is included in the 90 days allotted for your visit.

If you go to Canada and Mexico or the Caribbean, and while you are there, your initial 90-day period of entry expires, but you need to come back in to the U.S. to fly home, you may encounter a problem.

VWP is the only category that specifically precludes bouncing out and back from contiguous or adjacent territory. People with visas are welcome to attempt it. The only exception would be automatic visa revalidation for a J or F who went to Cuba.
crg is offline  
Old Jun 1st 2015, 2:44 am
  #19  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
MarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by retzie
I'm pretty sure people in this thread are visa-holders, who have I-94s expiring, while the underlying visa remains valid, eg. B2 cohabiting partners.
It would be useful if the OP had provided all the relevant info.
MarylandNed is offline  
Old Jun 4th 2015, 8:05 pm
  #20  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 95
Enigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond reputeEnigma368 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by crg
VWP is the only category that specifically precludes bouncing out and back from contiguous or adjacent territory. People with visas are welcome to attempt it. The only exception would be automatic visa revalidation for a J or F who went to Cuba.
These are definitely the rules - you are however allowed to go to slightly further away countries in latin America and do this.

That all being said, I was in the US from September to December last year. I left to go to Mexico three times during that period, once by air and twice to Tijuana for the day. At least one of these times(I think the flight), I got a new VWP stamp with a new expiry date 90 days in the future. Whether this new stamp actually legally gave me a fresh 90 days to stay in the US I do not know, I left the US properly within the original 90 day period.
Enigma368 is offline  
Old Jun 5th 2015, 11:21 pm
  #21  
Grumpy Know-it-all
 
Steve_'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 8,928
Steve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond reputeSteve_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by crg
Going over and back for a TN vs a B2 is completely different.
Well I assumed he was in something other than B-2, he didn't say.

TN, E, L, H etc have a clear reason for seeking more time with a specific employer.
TN-1 reapplication is not considered a simple renewal or extension (legally), you have to establish non-immigrant intent for example.

Some even have petitions that were already reviewed and approved.
TN-1 wouldn't, generally.

A B2 is seeking admission for a vague "more visiting" purpose. Cohabiting B2 is still not fully understood by border guards nor viewed favorably because it seems to contradict with the spirit of the traditional B2.
Which is why you should get your visa annotated to say that's why you got it. I have spoken to one Canadian though who did just flagpole to get more time and not only that but she actually went in originally just to visit her boyfriend and decided to stay longer.

Even a cohabiting B2 is required to maintain a foreign residence and be able to prove it if called upon to do so.
But so is the principal in many cases, contrary to popular belief not all categories are dual-intent. Which is why you need a copy of their I-94 and I-797 and anything else relevant, CBP aren't going to just hand it out at random.

DOS/CIS recommends that the cohabiting B2 seek more time is via an extension. Even though this person will likely succeed, I don't disagree with the assertion that the practice is generally frowned upon.
Well personally I think it's a waste of money on a plane ticket but to each their own.
Steve_ is offline  
Old Jun 11th 2015, 2:25 am
  #22  
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

"TN-1 reapplication is not considered a simple renewal or extension (legally), you have to establish non-immigrant intent for example."

The nonimmigrant intent required of a TN, O, R or similar is not as stringent as classificatios like B, F, J and M. The latter must maintain an actual physical dwelling place outside the US. The former only has to plan/agree to reestablish one once they are no longer enjoying the status.

A person applying for a TN who is either under adjustment, planning to adjust etc are really the only scenarios where a denial due to immigrant intent would be appropriate. Of course there could be the occasional rogue guard who has a different interpretation.
crg is offline  
Old Jun 11th 2015, 2:20 pm
  #23  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland (via Belfast, Manchester, Toronto and London)
Posts: 4,802
MarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond reputeMarylandNed has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by crg
A person applying for a TN who is either under adjustment, planning to adjust etc are really the only scenarios where a denial due to immigrant intent would be appropriate.
Another possibility is someone who has previously applied to adjust (even if they got turned down).

Technically speaking, "planning to adjust" is not a reason for TN denial. You can even file I-140 (immigrant petition) or I-130 (family-based immigrant petition) and still be eligible for TN. However, once I-485 is filed, you are no longer eligible for TN. Also, filing I-485 too early after obtaining TN can be considered immigration fraud.

This link provides a good explanation of TN and "dual intent":

TN Visa – The Limitations and Disadvantages of TN Status - Zhang & Attorneys, L.P. in Silicon Valley, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Austin, and Seattle

IMMIGRATION PETITION CAN BE A BAR:

A TN visa is not a dual intent visa, meaning that applying for permanent resident status can cause issues when traveling outside of the United States or seeking an extension of your TN visa. A pending application for permanent residence can be the basis of an initial denial of TN status. In this respect TN status is unlike H-1B status,where the alien may have dual intent without an adverse effect to the alien's non-immigrant or immigrant petition. However, a pending or approved employment based immigrant petition (Form I-140) or family based immigration petition (I-130) does NOT impute immigrant intent. The TN alien is eligible for TN extensions & to be admitted as a TN alien until the adjustment of status application (Form I-485) is filed or the applicant applies for the immigrant visa.

While other types of status holders (such as H-1, L-1 or O-1) may apply for Adjustment of Status (AOS) as soon as they wish once entering the country, those of TN status have at least a 30 to 60 day waiting period upon entering the United States before they may apply for AOS. Any applications before this waiting period is over will be considered an attempt to gain fraudulent entry by the USCIS. Additionally, the U.S. consulate may deny a TN visa application if the alien has previous applied for an immigration petition or AOS. Those on TN status who wish to file an I-140 immigration petition should not travel outside of the country because they will encounter issues upon their re-entry. If an alien on TN status has an approved I-140 petition and is currently waiting on their AOS petition to be approved, they must be sure to apply for Advanced Parole to travel outside of the country. For more information on AOS, please click Adjustment of Status.

Source: 8 CFR 214.6
MarylandNed is offline  
Old Jun 14th 2015, 1:56 pm
  #24  
crg
American Expat
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,598
crg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond reputecrg has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Flying to Mexico to renew i94

Originally Posted by MarylandNed
Another possibility is someone who has previously applied to adjust (even if they got turned down).

Technically speaking, "planning to adjust" is not a reason for TN denial. You can even file I-140 (immigrant petition) or I-130 (family-based immigrant petition) and still be eligible for TN. However, once I-485 is filed, you are no longer eligible for TN.
Planning to submit an application to adjustment on that entry is a reason for someone who is seeking admission as a TN, even if the TN was already adjudicated. Even if they have the I-94.

Someone who is the beneficiary an I-130 or I-140 could intend to complete the process at the consulate with an immigrant visa or via AOS.

The immigrant visa process is not an AOS.

The I-130/I-140 could be an indicator that there is a potential adjustment on the horizon but not necessarily going to take place on that entry. Take an F41 sibling with a priority date unlikely to arrive within the next decade. AOS is not likely in that case. It all comes to the intent. There is always a presumption of immigrant intent built into the INA that must be overcome.

The petition is only an indicator. The admissibility decision is based on the totality of circumstances and not a string of if/then calculations.
crg is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.